Assessing the Role and Value of Interactivity in Visual Business Intelligence

The development and success of many organizations to a large extent depend on how well and how timely they manage to gain insight into collected data. Business Intelligence (BI) provides methods for analyzing business-critical information and supports decision-making processes. But the ever growing amounts of data and information clearly overwhelm traditional manual methods of data analysis such as spreadsheets, standard reporting or simple diagrams. One possibility to face this problem is Information Visualization (InfoVis). By utilizing the powerful human perceptual system that is extremely efficient in processing visual input, visualization, for example, can help to make sense of data, explore complex information spaces or spot patterns and relationships within the data. Interactivity or the possibility to engage in an active discourse with the representation lies at the core of Information Visualization. However, empirical evidence and detailed approaches to model the concept of interactivity are largely missing in research today. This thesis is a first step towards bridging this gap and approaching the concept of interactivity more in depth. In order to do so, a twofold approach was chosen. First, the concept of interactivity was investigated from a theoretical point of view. In particular, cognitive theories and models were analyzed in order to determine their ability to explain and predict the value and role of interactivity in visual methods. Second, a qualitative empirical study was conducted among six IT-managers working in the field of Business Intelligence to assess the current practice at work concerning visual methods and interactivity. The main results are that cognitive theories and models do not explicitly account for the role of interactivity but rather concentrate on modeling the elements of a cognitive system and explaining how these entities interact with each other to achieve a certain goal. How different types of interactivity influence these processes is usually not part of the theories, and the effect of interactivity on cognitive processes was hardly ever mentioned. Apart from that, the empirical study showed that interactive visual methods in the area of Business Intelligence aren’t used very often. One of the main reasons reported is the fact that visualization is still two steps ahead and at the moment mostly more basic problems concerning data gathering, data modeling and data quality prevail. Moreover, most users are used to work with numbers and tables and are not aware of the possibilities in terms of visualization. However, the interviewed IT-managers acknowledged that using more interactive visual methods in Business Intelligence would be beneficial for users.

[1]  Brenda Laurel,et al.  Computers as theatre , 1991 .

[2]  Nancy Williams,et al.  The business value of business intelligence , 2007 .

[3]  Chris North,et al.  Information Visualization , 2008, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[4]  Jennifer Stromer-Galley,et al.  Interactivity-as-Product and Interactivity-as-Process , 2004, Inf. Soc..

[5]  Daniel A. Keim,et al.  Challenges in Visual Data Analysis , 2006, Tenth International Conference on Information Visualisation (IV'06).

[6]  V. Kaptelinin Activity theory: implications for human-computer interaction , 1995 .

[7]  Chris North,et al.  The Value of Information Visualization , 2008, Information Visualization.

[8]  Catherine Plaisant,et al.  The challenge of information visualization evaluation , 2004, AVI.

[9]  Mary Czerwinski,et al.  Empirical evaluation of information visualizations: an introduction , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[10]  Kristin A. Cook,et al.  Illuminating the Path: The Research and Development Agenda for Visual Analytics , 2005 .

[11]  M. Csíkszentmihályi Flow. The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York (HarperPerennial) 1990. , 1990 .

[12]  Jef Raskin,et al.  The Humane Interface: New Directions for Designing Interactive Systems , 2000 .

[13]  John T. Stasko,et al.  Toward a Deeper Understanding of the Role of Interaction in Information Visualization , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[14]  Tim S. Meese,et al.  Basic vision: an introduction to visual perception , 2007 .

[15]  James D. Hollan,et al.  Direct Manipulation Interfaces , 1985, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[16]  P. Thagard,et al.  Mind: Introduction to Cognitive Science , 1996 .

[17]  Deborah Richards,et al.  Is interactivity actually important , 2006 .

[18]  Cindi Howson,et al.  Successful Business Intelligence: Secrets to Making BI a Killer App , 2007 .

[19]  Tarja Susi In Search of the Holy Grail: Understanding Artefact Mediation in Social Interactions , 2005 .

[20]  L. F Calvino,et al.  Naisbitt j. Megatrends, ten new directions transforming our lives. New york, warner books, 1982 , 1986 .

[21]  S. Sundar The MAIN Model : A Heuristic Approach to Understanding Technology Effects on Credibility , 2007 .

[22]  Devina Ramduny-Ellis,et al.  Trigger Analysis - understanding broken tasks , 2003 .

[23]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Where the action is , 2001 .

[24]  Robert Spence,et al.  Information Visualization: Design for Interaction (2nd Edition) , 2006 .

[25]  Allen Newell,et al.  The psychology of human-computer interaction , 1983 .

[26]  Bernhard Humm,et al.  Architektur von Data Warehouses und Business Intelligence Systemen , 2005, Informatik-Spektrum.

[27]  Chaomei Chen Information visualization: Information visualization , 2010 .

[28]  Eric Doyle R&D: Get the picture , 2007 .

[29]  Jacques Bertin,et al.  Graphics and graphic information-processing , 1981 .

[30]  Chaomei Chen,et al.  Empirical studies of information visualization: a meta-analysis , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[31]  Hans Peter Luhn,et al.  A Business Intelligence System , 1958, IBM J. Res. Dev..

[32]  M. Sheelagh T. Carpendale,et al.  Evaluating Information Visualizations , 2008, Information Visualization.

[33]  Gerhard Fischer,et al.  Sustaining Social Creativity , 2007 .

[34]  Colin Ware,et al.  Information Visualization: Perception for Design , 2000 .

[35]  Jonathan Steuer,et al.  Defining virtual reality: dimensions determining telepresence , 1992 .

[36]  Silvia Miksch,et al.  Visualizations at First Sight: Do Insights Require Training? , 2008, USAB.

[37]  Efraim Turban,et al.  Business Intelligence: Second European Summer School, eBISS 2012, Brussels, Belgium, July 15-21, 2012, Tutorial Lectures , 2013 .

[38]  Tapio Ahokas,et al.  Information Visualization in a Business Decision Support System , 2008 .

[39]  Michel Beaudouin-Lafon,et al.  Designing interaction, not interfaces , 2004, AVI.

[40]  Keith Devlin,et al.  Infosense: Turning Information into Knowledge , 1999 .

[41]  M. Csíkszentmihályi Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience , 1990 .

[42]  C. Chabris,et al.  Gorillas in Our Midst: Sustained Inattentional Blindness for Dynamic Events , 1999, Perception.

[43]  Philip H. Mirvis Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience , 1991 .

[44]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[45]  James T. Enns,et al.  High-speed visual estimation using preattentive processing , 1996, TCHI.

[46]  E. Hutchins Cognition in the wild , 1995 .

[47]  J. Naisbitt Megatrends: Ten New Directions Transforming Our Lives , 1982 .

[48]  D. Norman The psychology of everyday things , 1990 .

[49]  A. N. Leont’ev,et al.  Activity, consciousness, and personality , 1978 .

[50]  Richard A D'Aveni Mapping your competitive position. , 2007, Harvard business review.

[51]  Julian Warner,et al.  Leonardo's Laptop: Human Needs and the New Computing Technologies , 2006, J. Documentation.

[52]  Marvin Minsky,et al.  A framework for representing knowledge , 1974 .

[53]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Psychology of everyday things , 1990 .

[54]  B. Nardi Context and consciousness: activity theory and human-computer interaction , 1995 .

[55]  Jon Trinder,et al.  The Humane Interface: New Directions for Designing Interactive Systems , 2002, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[56]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction , 1998 .

[57]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Things That Make Us Smart: Defending Human Attributes In The Age Of The Machine , 1993 .

[58]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  The eyes have it: a task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations , 1996, Proceedings 1996 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages.

[59]  Bernhard Preim,et al.  Entwicklung interaktiver Systeme , 1999 .

[60]  Peter Chamoni,et al.  Management Support Systeme und Business Intelligence: Computergestützte Informationssysteme für Fach- und Führungskräfte , 2005 .

[61]  John T. Stasko,et al.  Distributed Cognition as a Theoretical Framework for Information Visualization , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[62]  W. R. Howard Acting with Technology: Activity Theory and Interaction Design , 2007 .

[63]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Direct Manipulation: A Step Beyond Programming Languages , 1983, Computer.

[64]  Chris North,et al.  An Insight-Based Longitudinal Study of Visual Analytics , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[65]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Design as practiced , 1996 .

[66]  Jeanne G. Harris,et al.  Competing on Analytics: The New Science of Winning , 2007 .

[67]  Lucy Suchman Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication , 1987 .

[68]  David Kirsh,et al.  The Context of Work , 2001, Hum. Comput. Interact..