Indirect reciprocity, image scoring, and moral hazard.

Whether one-shot interactions can stably sustain mutual cooperation if they are based on a minimal form of reputation building has been the subject of considerable debate. We show by mathematical modeling that the answer is positive if we assume an individual's social network evolves in time. In this case, a stable mixture of discriminating and undiscriminating altruists can be proof against invasion by defectors. This sheds light on current discussions about the merits of different types of moral assessment, an issue where theoretical arguments and experimental findings seem at odds.Unexpectedly, our approach also relates to the proverbial observation that people tend to become more tightfisted with age.

[1]  Michael A Fishman,et al.  Indirect reciprocity among imperfect individuals. , 2003, Journal of theoretical biology.

[2]  博 太郎丸 <書評> Robert Sugden, "The economics of rights, co-operation and welfare", Oxford : Basil Blackwell, 1986 , 1992 .

[3]  V. Braithwaite,et al.  The Long-Term Benefits of Human Generosity in Indirect Reciprocity , 2002, Current Biology.

[4]  Chrysanthos Dellarocas,et al.  Sanctioning Reputation Mechanisms in Online Trading Environments with Moral Hazard , 2004 .

[5]  M. Milinski,et al.  Cooperation through indirect reciprocity: image scoring or standing strategy? , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  Karl Sigmund,et al.  The logic of reprobation: assessment and action rules for indirect reciprocation. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[7]  Lik Mui,et al.  Evolution of indirect reciprocity by social information: the role of trust and reputation in evolution of altruism. , 2003, Journal of theoretical biology.

[8]  O. Leimar,et al.  Evolution of cooperation through indirect reciprocity , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  M. Milinski,et al.  Reputation helps solve the ‘tragedy of the commons’ , 2002, Nature.

[10]  Claudia Keser,et al.  Trust and Reputation Building in E-Commerce , 2002 .

[11]  Lee Alan Dugatkin,et al.  Reciprocity and the emergence of reputation , 1992 .

[12]  Yoh Iwasa,et al.  How should we define goodness?--reputation dynamics in indirect reciprocity. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[13]  U. Fischbacher,et al.  The nature of human altruism , 2003, Nature.

[14]  M. Milinski,et al.  Cooperation through image scoring in humans. , 2000, Science.

[15]  Josef Hofbauer,et al.  Evolutionary Games and Population Dynamics , 1998 .

[16]  E. Fehr,et al.  Altruistic punishment in humans , 2002, Nature.

[17]  M A Nowak,et al.  The logic of contrition. , 1997, Journal of theoretical biology.

[18]  A. Schram,et al.  UvA-DARE ( Digital Academic Repository ) Social status and group norms : Indirect reciprocity in a helping experiment , 2001 .

[19]  M. Nowak,et al.  Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring , 1998, Nature.

[20]  R. D. Alexander The biology of moral systems , 1989 .

[21]  Dirk Semmann,et al.  Donors to charity gain in both indirect reciprocity and political reputation , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  Karthik Panchanathan,et al.  A tale of two defectors: the importance of standing for evolution of indirect reciprocity. , 2003, Journal of theoretical biology.

[23]  R. Boyd,et al.  Indirect reciprocity can stabilize cooperation without the second-order free rider problem , 2004, Nature.