Optimal inverter sizing considering cloud enhancement

Abstract A study of a photovoltaic (PV) array and inverter system installed in San Diego, California, was conducted in order to determine the energy losses due to inverter saturation (capping of inverter power output due to the PV array power output exceeding the inverter maximum power rating). Two mechanisms of saturation were considered: cloud enhancement (refers to an increased diffuse component of irradiance caused by clouds surrounding the unobstructed solar disk) and clear sky exceedance. For inverter sizing ratios (defined as R = inverter maximum AC output rating/PV DC rating) of R = 0.81 and R = 0.87 the annual energy losses as a percent of annual energy production were 2.65% and 2.20% using 1-s measurement resolution. Annual energy losses were calculated by aggregating the difference between modeled power (assuming no saturation occurred) and measured power. Losses due to cloud enhancement dominated the total losses, especially for R = 0.87. Increasing inverter size reduces saturation losses during high irradiance conditions, but decreases inverter conversion efficiency under low irradiance conditions. Increasing the sizing ratio to R = 1.22 would result in a maximum amount of energy production at our site. Averaging on timescales from 1-s to 1-h was performed to demonstrate that cloud enhancement losses can only be quantified using 10-s or finer measurements.

[1]  B. Burger,et al.  Inverter sizing of grid-connected photovoltaic systems in the light of local solar resource distribution characteristics and temperature , 2006 .

[2]  C. Long,et al.  Identification of clear skies from broadband pyranometer measurements and calculation of downwelling shortwave cloud effects , 2000 .

[3]  E. Arias-Castro,et al.  High-frequency irradiance fluctuations and geographic smoothing , 2012 .

[4]  Wilson Negrão Macêdo,et al.  Operational results of grid-connected photovoltaic system with different inverter´s sizing factors (ISF) , 2007 .

[5]  D. C. Hamill,et al.  Simple maximum power point tracker for photovoltaic arrays , 2000 .

[6]  P.L. Chapman,et al.  Comparison of Photovoltaic Array Maximum Power Point Tracking Techniques , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[7]  C. Long,et al.  Cloud Coverage Based on All-Sky Imaging and Its Impact on Surface Solar Irradiance , 2003 .

[8]  M. Vitelli,et al.  Optimization of perturb and observe maximum power point tracking method , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[9]  J. Kleissl,et al.  Intra-hour forecasting with a total sky imager at the UC San Diego solar energy testbed , 2011 .

[10]  J. Kleissl,et al.  Optimum fixed orientations and benefits of tracking for capturing solar radiation in the continental United States , 2011 .

[11]  Gilles Notton,et al.  Optimal sizing of a grid-connected PV system for various PV module technologies and inclinations, inverter efficiency characteristics and locations , 2010 .

[12]  Gustavo Nofuentes,et al.  Design tools for the electrical configuration of architecturally‐integrated PV in buildings , 1999 .

[13]  Andreas Macke,et al.  Enhanced solar global irradiance during cloudy sky conditions , 2007 .