Reduced microvascular and myocardial damage in patients with acute myocardial infarction and preinfarction angina.

BACKGROUND After acute myocardial infarction, the presence of ischemic preconditioning as a result of preinfarction angina has a protective role, limiting necrosis extent and guaranteeing greater myocardial functional recovery. The relationship between preinfarction angina, microvascular reflow, and myocardial function is poorly known. We hypothesized that after acute myocardial infarction patients with preinfarction angina have both microvascular integrity and myocardial function preservation. METHODS AND RESULTS In 51 patients with a first acute myocardial infarction, we noninvasively assessed microvascular perfusion and coronary flow reserve with intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography and investigated myocardial contractile recovery with low-dose dobutamine and 90-day follow-up echocardiography. Typical angina was present in 25 patients and absent in 26 patients during the 7 days preceding the myocardial infarction. Compared with those patients without preinfarction angina, patients with preinfarction angina showed a greater microvascular reflow extent and coronary flow reserve (respectively, 25.2% +/- 22.8% vs 48.3% +/- 23.3%, P <.05, and 3.44 +/- 0.75 vs 1.95 +/- 0.67, P <.0001), a better regional myocardial function, as expressed with wall motion score index in the risk area at dobutamine (1.67 +/- 0.61 vs 2.10 +/- 0.43, P <.005) and at follow-up (1.72 +/- 0.56 vs 2.22 +/- 0.40, P <.0001) echocardiogram, despite being similar in the first echocardiogram (2.60 +/- 0.28 vs 2.63 +/- 0.28, P = not significant), and significantly less pronounced left ventricular dilation at follow-up. CONCLUSION Presence of preinfarction angina, because of the preconditioning effect, reduces myocardial damage and favors myocardial viability, limiting left ventricular remodeling. This beneficial effect seems to be at least partly mediated by the more preserved microvascular integrity and functional vasodilation after acute myocardial infarction.

[1]  T. Sakuma,et al.  Optimal time for predicting myocardial viability after successful primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction: a study using myocardial contrast echocardiography. , 2001, The American journal of cardiology.

[2]  G. Schuler,et al.  Effect of preinfarction angina pectoris on outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty (results from the Myocardial Infarction Registry. , 2001, The American journal of cardiology.

[3]  J. Downey,et al.  Favorable remodeling enhances recovery of regional myocardial function in the weeks after infarction in ischemically preconditioned hearts. , 2000, Circulation.

[4]  P. Grayburn,et al.  Assessment of myocardial perfusion by harmonic power Doppler imaging at rest and during adenosine stress: comparison with (99m)Tc-sestamibi SPECT imaging. , 2000, Circulation.

[5]  C. Visser,et al.  Assessment of Myocardial Reperfusion by Intravenous Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography and Coronary Flow Reserve After Primary Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angiography in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction , 2000 .

[6]  P. Steg,et al.  Decreased no-reflow in patients with anterior myocardial infarction and pre-infarction angina. , 1999, European heart journal.

[7]  D. Stepp,et al.  Regulation of shear stress in the canine coronary microcirculation. , 1999, Circulation.

[8]  F. Eberli,et al.  Is the development of myocardial tolerance to repeated ischemia in humans due to preconditioning or to collateral recruitment? , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  C Caiati,et al.  New noninvasive method for coronary flow reserve assessment: contrast-enhanced transthoracic second harmonic echo Doppler. , 1999, Circulation.

[10]  K. Loke,et al.  PRECONDITIONING IMPROVES MYOCARDIAL FUNCTION AND REFLOW, BUT NOT VASODILATOR REACTIVITY, AFTER ISCHAEMIA AND REPERFUSION IN ANAESTHETIZED DOGS , 1998, Clinical and experimental pharmacology & physiology.

[11]  E. Antman,et al.  Prospective temporal analysis of the onset of preinfarction angina versus outcome: an ancillary study in TIMI-9B. , 1998, Circulation.

[12]  D. Antoniucci,et al.  Influence of infarct-zone viability on left ventricular remodeling after acute myocardial infarction. , 1997, Circulation.

[13]  M. Ishihara,et al.  Implications of prodromal angina pectoris in anterior wall acute myocardial infarction: acute angiographic findings and long-term prognosis. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  P. Colonna,et al.  Analysis of microvascular integrity, contractile reserve, and myocardial viability after acute myocardial infarction by dobutamine echocardiography and myocardial contrast echocardiography. , 1996, The American journal of cardiology.

[15]  M. Hori,et al.  Clinical implications of the 'no reflow' phenomenon. A predictor of complications and left ventricular remodeling in reperfused anterior wall myocardial infarction. , 1996, Circulation.

[16]  A. Maseri,et al.  Preinfarction angina as a predictor of more rapid coronary thrombolysis in patients with acute myocardial infarction. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  S. Ogawa,et al.  Preinfarction angina as a major predictor of left ventricular function and long-term prognosis after a first Q wave myocardial infarction. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[18]  R. Korthuis,et al.  Ischemic preconditioning attenuates capillary no-reflow induced by prolonged ischemia and reperfusion. , 1995, The American journal of physiology.

[19]  M. Hori,et al.  Effect of angina pectoris on myocardial protection in patients with reperfused anterior wall myocardial infarction: retrospective clinical evidence of "preconditioning". , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  M. Galvani,et al.  Prodromal angina limits infarct size. A role for ischemic preconditioning. , 1995, Circulation.

[21]  R. Kloner,et al.  Does ischemic preconditioning occur in patients? , 1994, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[22]  M. Hori,et al.  Progressive decreases in coronary vein flow during reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction: clinical documentation of the no reflow phenomenon after successful thrombolysis. , 1994, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[23]  V. Richard,et al.  Ischemic preconditioning protects against coronary endothelial dysfunction induced by ischemia and reperfusion. , 1994, Circulation.

[24]  W. Chilian,et al.  Preconditioning protects coronary arteriolar endothelium from ischemia-reperfusion injury. , 1993, The American journal of physiology.

[25]  R. Kloner,et al.  Does Preconditioning Protect the Coronary Vasculature From Subsequent Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury? , 1993, Circulation.

[26]  M. Hori,et al.  Delayed effects of sublethal ischemia on the acquisition of tolerance to ischemia. , 1993, Circulation research.

[27]  R. Jennings,et al.  Preconditioning with ischemia: a delay of lethal cell injury in ischemic myocardium. , 1986, Circulation.