Impairment-oriented training or Bobath therapy for severe arm paresis after stroke: a single-blind, multicentre randomized controlled trial

Objective: To study the effects of augmented exercise therapy time for arm rehabilitation as either Bobath therapy or the impairment-oriented training (Arm BASIS training) in stroke patients with arm severe paresis. Design: Single blind, multicentre randomized control trial. Setting: Three inpatient neurorehabilitation centres. Subjects: Sixty-two anterior circulation ischaemic stroke patients. Interventions: Random assignment to three group: (A) no augmented exercise therapy time, (B) augmented exercise therapy time as Bobath therapy and (C) augmented exercise therapy time as Arm BASIS training. Main measures: Main outcome measure: Fugl-Meyer arm motor score. Secondary measure: Action Research Arm Test (ARA). Ancillary measures: Fugl-Meyer arm sensation and joint motion/pain scores and the Ashworth Scale (elbow flexors). Results: An overall effect of augmented exercise therapy time on Fugl-Meyer scores after four weeks was not corroborated (mean and 95% confidence interval (CI) of change scores: no augmented exercise therapy time (n = 20) 8.8, 5.2–12.3; augmented exercise therapy time (n = 40) 9.9, 6.8-13.9; p = 0.2657). The group who received the augmented exercise therapy time as Arm BASIS training (n = 20) had, however, higher gains than the group receiving the augmented exercise therapy time as Bobath therapy (n = 20) (mean and 95% CI of change scores: Bobath 7.2, 2.6-11.8; BASIS 12.6, 8.4 - 16.8; p = 0.0432). Passive joint motion/pain deteriorated less in the group who received BASIS training (mean and 95% CI of change scores: Bobath -3.2, -5.2 to -1.1; BASIS 0.1, -1.8-2.0; p = 0.0090). ARA, Fugl-Meyer arm sensation, and Ashworth Scale scores were not differentially affected. Conclusions: The augmented exercise therapy time as Arm BASIS training enhanced selective motor control. Type of training was more relevant for recovery of motor control than therapeutic time spent.

[1]  B Cooper,et al.  Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation. , 1989, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[2]  R. Lyle A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research , 1981, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[3]  J. Grotta,et al.  Graded neurologic scale for use in acute hemispheric stroke treatment protocols. , 1987, Stroke.

[4]  A. Arsenault,et al.  Motor function and activities of daily living assessments: a study of three tests for persons with hemiplegia. , 1991, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[5]  J. H. van der Lee,et al.  Exercise therapy for arm function in stroke patients: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials , 2001, Clinical rehabilitation.

[6]  Jürgen Windeler,et al.  Intention‐to‐treat: methods for dealing with missing values in clinical trials of progressively deteriorating diseases , 2001, Statistics in medicine.

[7]  R Langton-Hewer,et al.  The hemiplegic arm after stroke: measurement and recovery. , 1983, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[8]  J. van Limbeek,et al.  Prognostic factors for ambulation and activities of daily living in the subacute phase after stroke. A systematic review of the literature , 2003, Clinical rehabilitation.

[9]  B. Ashworth PRELIMINARY TRIAL OF CARISOPRODOL IN MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS. , 1964, The Practitioner.

[10]  H. Feys,et al.  Effect of a therapeutic intervention for the hemiplegic upper limb in the acute phase after stroke: a single-blind, randomized, controlled multicenter trial. , 1998, Stroke.

[11]  Mary Elizabeth Parker,et al.  Recovery of Upper Extremity Function in Stroke Patients: The Copenhagen Stroke Study , 1995 .

[12]  Konrad Jamrozik,et al.  Long-Term Disability After First-Ever Stroke and Related Prognostic Factors in the Perth Community Stroke Study, 1989–1990 , 2002, Stroke.

[13]  T. Platz [Evidence-based arm rehabilitation--a systematic review of the literature]. , 2003, Der Nervenarzt.

[14]  Peter Langhorne,et al.  Effects of Augmented Exercise Therapy Time After Stroke: A Meta-Analysis , 2004, Stroke.

[15]  A. Fugl-Meyer,et al.  The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. , 1975, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[16]  C. Burgar,et al.  Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[17]  Réjean Hébert,et al.  Impact of Motor, Cognitive, and Perceptual Disorders on Ability to Perform Activities of Daily Living After Stroke , 2001, Stroke.

[18]  T. Olsen,et al.  Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. , 1994, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[19]  C. Richards,et al.  Arm and leg impairments and disabilities after stroke rehabilitation: relation to handicap , 2003, Clinical rehabilitation.

[20]  JohnChae,et al.  Neuromuscular Stimulation for Upper Extremity Motor and Functional Recovery in Acute Hemiplegia , 1998 .

[21]  T. Platz,et al.  Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer Test, Action Research Arm Test and Box and Block Test: a multicentre study , 2005, Clinical rehabilitation.

[22]  P. Stratford,et al.  Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment for testing motor performance in patients following stroke. , 1993, Physical therapy.

[23]  J. Bamford,et al.  Classification and natural history of clinically identifiable subtypes of cerebral infarction , 1991, The Lancet.

[24]  Sheila Lennon,et al.  The Bobath concept: a critical review of the theoretical assumptions that guide physiotherapy practice in stroke rehabilitation , 1996 .

[25]  J. Windeler,et al.  Intention-to-treat: methods for dealing with missing values in clinical trials of progressively deteriorating diseases. , 2001, Statistics in medicine.

[26]  N. Hogan,et al.  A novel approach to stroke rehabilitation , 2000, Neurology.

[27]  R. M. Glaser,et al.  The effects of functional electrical stimulation on shoulder subluxation, arm function recovery, and shoulder pain in hemiplegic stroke patients. , 1994, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[28]  N B Lincoln,et al.  Randomized, controlled trial to evaluate increased intensity of physiotherapy treatment of arm function after stroke. , 1999, Stroke.

[29]  T. Platz,et al.  Impairment-oriented training (IOT)--scientific concept and evidence-based treatment strategies. , 2004, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[30]  K H Mauritz,et al.  Arm ability training for stroke and traumatic brain injury patients with mild arm paresis: a single-blind, randomized, controlled trial. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.