Effects of interchannel crosstalk in multichannel microphone technique

Even though the significance of interchannel crosstalk in multichannel microphone technique has been an issue of much debate in the field of sound recording, any effects on the perception of reproduced phantom images have not been investigated systematically. There is consequently no experimental data to which sound engineers can refer when attempting to control interchannel crosstalk in the design and application of multichannel microphone technique. It was therefore necessary to investigate the effects of such interchannel crosstalk in both the perceptual and the physical domains. Extant multichannel microphone techniques were reviewed, concentrating on their crosstalk characteristics. Findings from concert hall and room acoustics studies relating to the effects of early reflections, which might be the basis for understanding the perceptual effects of interchannel crosstalk, were also studied. The effects of interchannel time and intensity relationship and sound source type on the perception of stereophonic phantom image attributes were first examined in the context of two-channel stereophonic reproduction. The perceptual attributes of phantom sources affected by interchannel crosstalk in three- channel microphone technique were then elicited, and the effects of interchannel time and intensity relationship, sound source type and acoustic condition on the perception of those attributes were investigated. The effects of interchannel crosstalk on sound quality preference were also examined in both controlled and practical manners. Finally, following objective measurements of experimental stimuli, relationships were established between the perceptual and objectively measured effects of interchannel crosstalk. It was found that the most salient perceptual effects of interchannel crosstalk were an increase in source width and a decrease in locatedness. The relationship between interchannel time and intensity differences involved in the crosstalk signal was significant for both effects. The type of sound source was significant only for the source width effect whereas the acoustic condition was significant only for the locatedness effect. The source width increase was mainly influenced by the middle frequencies of crosstalk signals in a region of the spectrum around 1000Hz, at the onsets of the signal envelopes. The results of listener preference experiments suggested that the preference for interchannel crosstalk would depend on the spectral and temporal characteristics of sound source to be recorded rather than on the magnitude of interchannel crosstalk.

[1]  D. McFadden,et al.  Lateralization of high frequencies based on interaural time differences. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Willard R. Thurlow,et al.  Precedence-Suppression Effects for Two Click Sources , 1961 .

[3]  M. Barron.  The subjective effects of first reflections in concert halls—The need for lateral reflections , 1971 .

[4]  W. Rosenblith,et al.  Some Electrophysiological Correlates of the Perception of Successive Clicks , 1950 .

[5]  Michel C. Lavoie,et al.  Investigation of Listener Envelopment in Multichannel Surround Systems , 2002 .

[6]  Jerry V. Tobias,et al.  Lateralization Threshold as a Function of Stimulus Duration , 1959 .

[7]  Akira Fukada,et al.  A challenge in multichannel music recording , 2001 .

[8]  Francis Rumsey,et al.  Integration of Measurements of Interaural Cross-Correlation Coefficient and Interaural Time Difference Within a Single Model of Perceived Source Width , 2004 .

[9]  Dana S. Hougland,et al.  Concert and Opera Halls: How They Sound , 1996 .

[10]  Michael Williams,et al.  Microphone Array Analysis for Multichannel Sound Recording , 1999 .

[11]  Francis Rumsey,et al.  Frequency dependency of the relationship between perceived auditory source width and the interaural cross-correlation coefficient for time-invariant stimuli. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  E. Hafter,et al.  Binaural interaction in low-frequency stimuli: the inability to trade time and intensity completely. , 1972, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  Søren Bech,et al.  Methods for Subjective Evaluation of Spatial Characteristics of Sound , 1999 .

[14]  Helmut Haas,et al.  The Influence of a Single Echo on the Audibility of Speech , 1972 .

[15]  Michael Williams,et al.  Multichannel Microphone Array Design , 2000 .

[16]  R L Freyman,et al.  Effect of click rate and delay on breakdown of the precedence effect. , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  Francis Rumsey,et al.  Development of the interaural cross-correlation coefficient into a more complete auditory width prediction model , 2004 .

[18]  Francis Rumsey,et al.  The effect of various source signal properties on measurements of the interaural crosscorrelation coefficient , 2005 .

[19]  K Kurozumi,et al.  The relationship between the cross-correlation coefficient of two-channel acoustic signals and sound image quality. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  W. Hartmann,et al.  Localization of sound in rooms, II: The effects of a single reflecting surface. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  Francis Rumsey,et al.  Evaluation of an auditory source width prediction model based on the interaural cross-correlation coefficient , 2004 .

[22]  R K Clifton.  Breakdown of echo suppression in the precedence effect. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  Günther Theile,et al.  Multichannel Natural Recording Based on Psychoacoustic Principles , 2000 .

[24]  Francis Rumsey,et al.  Validity of Selected Spatial Attributes in the Evaluation of 5-channel Microphone Techniques , 2002 .

[25]  Nick Zacharov,et al.  Unravelling the Perception of Spatial Sound Reproduction: Language Development, Verbal Protocol Analysis and Listener Training , 2001 .

[26]  A. Mills.  On the minimum audible angle , 1958 .

[27]  Wieslaw Woszczyk,et al.  Sound Source Localization in a Five-Channel Surround Sound Reproduction System , 1999 .

[28]  F L Wightman,et al.  Detectability of varying interaural temporal differences. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  L L Beranek,et al.  Relations among interaural cross-correlation coefficient (IACCE), lateral fraction (LFE), and apparent source width (ASW) in concert halls. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  A. H. Marshall,et al.  Spatial impression due to early lateral reflections in concert halls: The derivation of a physical measure , 1981 .

[31]  Leo L. Beranek,et al.  Interaural cross‐correlation, lateral fraction, and low‐ and high‐frequency sound levels as measures of acoustical quality in concert halls , 1995 .

[32]  Francis Rumsey,et al.  Interaural time difference fluctuations: their measurement, subjective perceptual effect, and application in sound reproduction , 2001 .

[33]  D. Perrott,et al.  Minimum audible angle thresholds obtained under conditions in which the precedence effect is assumed to operate. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  G. F. Kuhn.  Model for the interaural time differences in the azimuthal plane , 1977 .

[35]  C Trahiotis,et al.  Discrimination of interaural envelope correlation and its relation to binaural unmasking at high frequencies. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  Michael Williams.  Multichannel Sound Recording Practice Using Microphone Arrays , 2003 .

[37]  Kazuhiro Iida,et al.  A practical evaluation method of auditory source width in concert halls , 1995 .

[38]  Russell Mason,et al.  Elicitation and measurement of auditory spatial attributes in reproduced sound , 2002 .

[39]  J Blauert,et al.  Spatial mapping of intracranial auditory events for various degrees of interaural coherence. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[40]  L. Rayleigh,et al.  XII. On our perception of sound direction , 1907 .

[41]  Tobias Neher,et al.  Towards a spatial ear trainer. , 2004 .

[42]  Ralph Glasgal.  Ambiophonics. Achieving Physiological Realism in Music Recording and Reproduction , 2001 .

[43]  Francis Rumsey,et al.  Investigation Into the Effect of Interchannel Crosstalk in Multichannel Microphone Technique , 2005 .

[44]  D M Green,et al.  Localization of high- and low-frequency transients. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[45]  A. Gabrielsson,et al.  Perceived sound quality of sound-reproducing systems. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[46]  H. Mertens.  Directional hearing in stereophony-Theory and experimental verification , 1965 .

[47]  Helmut Wittek,et al.  The Recording Angle - Based on Localisation Curves , 2002 .

[48]  Torsten Marquardt,et al.  Detection of static and dynamic changes in interaural correlation. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[49]  G. C. Richards.  Stereophonic sound reproduction , 1955 .

[50]  E. C. Cherry,et al.  Mechanism of Binaural Fusion in the Hearing of Speech , 1957 .

[51]  P M Zurek,et al.  The precedence effect and its possible role in the avoidance of interaural ambiguities. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[52]  W. Hartmann,et al.  Localization of sound in rooms, III: Onset and duration effects. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[53]  Masayuki Morimoto,et al.  The relation between spatial impression and the precedence effect , 2002 .

[54]  M. Morimoto,et al.  Effects of low frequency components on auditory spaciousness , 1988 .

[55]  Manfred R. Schroeder,et al.  Comparative study of European concert halls: correlation of subjective preference with geometric and acoustic parameters , 1974 .

[56]  Villy Hansen,et al.  Making Recordings for Simulation Tests in the Archimedes Project , 1989 .

[57]  Hyunkook Lee,et al.  Elicitation and Grading of Subjective Attributes of 2-Channel Phantom Images , 2004 .

[58]  L. A. Jeffress,et al.  Effect of Varying the Interaural Noise Correlation on the Detectability of Tonal Signals , 1963 .

[59]  W M Hartmann,et al.  Localization of sound in rooms. IV: The Franssen effect. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[60]  The equivalence relation between interaural time and level differences for short stimuli , 2000 .

[61]  Okano.  Image shift caused by strong lateral reflections, and its relation to inter-aural cross correlation , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[62]  P. Damaske,et al.  Head‐Related Two‐Channel Stereophony with Loudspeaker Reproduction , 1971 .

[63]  D. Leakey.  Some Measurements on the Effects of Interchannel Intensity and Time Differences in Two Channel Sound Systems , 1959 .

[64]  Methods for the subjective assessment of small impairments in audio systems , 2015 .

[65]  Kimio Hamasaki.  Multichannel Recording Techniques for Reproducing Adequate Spatial Impression , 2003 .