Selecting Augmentative Communication Devices for Persons with Severe Disabilities: Some Factors for Educational Teams to Consider.

Because a variety of augmentative communication devices exist, ranging from high technology speech synthesizers to low technology communication boards, members of educational teams are faced with a number of important decisions when attempting to meet the communication needs of persons with severe disabilities. This paper discusses some of the factors that educational teams may need to consider when selecting communication devices for learners with severe disabilities. Consideration of the various components and features of both high and low technology devices may assist parents and professionals in selecting appropriate augmentative communication options for students with severe disabilities.

[1]  B. Iwata,et al.  Nonvocal language acquisition in adolescents with severe physical disabilities: Bliss symbol versus iconic stimulus formats. , 1982, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[2]  E. Carr,et al.  Acquisition of sign language by autistic children. II: Spontaneity and generalization effects. , 1983, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[3]  Teresa Iacono,et al.  Individual language learning styles and Augmentative and Alternative Communication , 1992 .

[4]  Jeff Sigafoos,et al.  Initial comparison of the efficiency of a variety of AAC systems for ordering meals in fast food restaurants , 1991 .

[5]  J. Reichle,et al.  Teaching Discriminative Use of an Encoding Electronic Communication Device and Signing Exact English to a Moderately Handicapped Child , 1985 .

[6]  Nicola Grove,et al.  The Makaton Vocabulary: Using manual signs and graphic symbols to develop interpersonal communication , 1990 .

[7]  J Q Simmons,et al.  Some generalization and follow-up measures on autistic children in behavior therapy. , 1973, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[8]  P. Hunt,et al.  Teaching Generalized Communicative Behaviors within Interrupted Behavior Chain Contexts , 1989 .

[9]  Pat Mirenda,et al.  Designing pictorial communication systems for physically able-bodied students with severe handicaps , 1985 .

[10]  R. Sevcik,et al.  Establishment of symbolic communication in persons with severe retardation. , 1988, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[11]  M. Sundberg.  Developing a Verbal Repertoire Using Sign Language and Skinner's Analysis of Verbal Behavior , 1980 .

[12]  J. Reichle,et al.  Teaching the Use of a Multipage Direct Selection Communication Board to an Adult with Autism , 1986 .

[13]  D. Guess,et al.  Enhancing Nonsymbolic Communication Interactions Among Learners With Severe Disabilities , 1989 .

[14]  L. Kent-Udolf.  Language acquisition program for the retarded or multiply impaired , 1974 .

[15]  Jeff Sigafoos,et al.  Comments on Augmentative and Alternative Communication Evaluation and System Selection: A Response to Woltosz , 1989 .

[16]  W. Sailor,et al.  Using a Behavior Chain Interruption Strategy to Teach Communication Skills to Students with Severe Disabilities , 1985 .

[17]  Jon F. Miller,et al.  Contemporary issues in language intervention , 1983 .

[18]  J Reichle,et al.  The intelligibility of synthesized speech: ECHO II versus VOTRAX. , 1987, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[19]  O. I. Lovaas,et al.  The autistic child , 1977 .

[20]  J. Reichle,et al.  The Selection of an Augmentative System in Communication Intervention: A Critique of Decision Rules , 1985 .

[21]  J. Reichle,et al.  Communication Board Use in Severely Handicapped Learners , 1985 .

[22]  Sarah W. Blackstone,et al.  Augmentative communication : an introduction , 1986 .

[23]  A. Schuler,et al.  Teaching functional speech to the severely handicapped: Current issues , 1979, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[24]  Caroline Ramsey Musselwhite,et al.  Communication programming for persons with severe handicaps: Vocal and augmentative strategies , 1988 .

[25]  J. Halle,et al.  Language Training in the Everyday Environment: Teaching Functional Sign Use to a Retarded Child , 1982 .

[26]  H. Johnson,et al.  A statewide demographic survey of people with severe communication impairments , 1990 .

[27]  M. Sundberg,et al.  Teaching mands by manipulating conditioned establishing operations , 1987, The Analysis of verbal behavior.

[28]  R. Bruininks,et al.  Trends in Residential Services for People Who are Mentally Retarded: 1977–1982 , 1984 .

[29]  Lyle L. Lloyd,et al.  Signs Used in Manual Communication Training with Persons Having Severe Communication Impairment , 1979 .

[30]  O. I. Lovaas,et al.  The autistic child: Language development through behavior modification. , 1977 .

[31]  David R. Beukelman,et al.  A comparison of intelligibility among natural speech and seven speech synthesizers with listeners from three age groups , 1990 .

[32]  Robert E. Williams,et al.  Communication Options for Persons with Severe and Profound Disabilities: State of the Art and Future Directions , 1990 .

[33]  T. Iacono,et al.  Stepping beyond the Teaching Manuals into Signing in the ‘Real World’ , 1987 .

[34]  G. B. Devey,et al.  3 – TECHNOLOGY AND PEOPLE , 1977 .

[35]  G. Vanderheiden,et al.  Teaching a Child with Multiple Disabilities to Use a Tactile Augmentative Communication Device , 1989 .

[36]  K. Bloomberg,et al.  The comparative translucency of initial lexical items represented in five graphic symbol systems and sets. , 1990, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[37]  David A. Rotholz,et al.  Functionality of Two Modes of Communication in the Community by Students with Developmental Disabilities: A Comparison of Signing and Communication Books , 1989 .

[38]  Diane Margaret Jauquet Baumgart,et al.  Augmentative and Alternative Communication Systems for Persons With Moderate and Severe Disabilities , 1990 .

[39]  David R. Beukelman,et al.  Identifying the nonspeaking population: a demographic study , 1985 .

[40]  J. Reichle,et al.  Establishing Pragmatic Discriminations among the Communicative Functions of Requesting, Rejecting, and Commenting in an Adolescent , 1984 .

[41]  C. Salisbury,et al.  Developing Respite Care Services for Families of Handicapped Persons , 1983 .

[42]  H. Shane,et al.  Election criteria for the adoption of an augmentative communication system: preliminary considerations. , 1980, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[43]  H. Grossman,et al.  Classification of Mental Retardation , 1960 .

[44]  Lyle L. Lloyd,et al.  Language Perspectives: Acquisition, Retardation, and Intervention , 1974 .

[45]  Stephen N. Calculator,et al.  Training functional communication board use: a pragmatic approach , 1985 .

[46]  P. Mirenda,et al.  A comparison of symbol transparency in nonspeaking persons with intellectual disabilities. , 1989, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[47]  A Proposed Model for Augmentative and Alternative Communication Evaluation and System Selection , 1988 .

[48]  Gregg C. Vanderheiden,et al.  Non-vocal communication techniques and aids for the severely physically handicapped : based upon transcriptions of the 1975 Trace Center national workshop series on non-vocal communication techniques and aids , 1976 .