PEER D4.1 Behavioural Research: Authors and Users vis-à-vis Journals and Repositories - Baseline report

The Behavioural research: Authors and users vis-a-vis journals and repositories project was commissioned by PEER in April 2009 as part of a broader initiative to investigate the effects of the large-scale, systematic deposit of authors' final peer-reviewed manuscripts (also called stage-two research outputs) on reader access, author visibility, and journal viability, as well as on the broader ecology of European research. The specific aim of the behavioural research is to understand the extent to which authors and users are aware of open access (OA), the different ways of achieving it, and the (de)motivating factors that influence its uptake.

[1]  Alma Swan,et al.  Open access self-archiving: An author study , 2005 .

[2]  Carol Tenopir,et al.  Electronic Journals and Changes in Scholarly Article Seeking and Reading Patterns , 2008, D Lib Mag..

[3]  A. Swan Open Access and the progress of science , 2007 .

[4]  C. Borgman Scholarship in the Digital Age: Information, Infrastructure, and the Internet , 2007 .

[5]  Jillian R. Griffiths,et al.  Communicating knowledge: how and why UK researchers publish and disseminate their findings , 2009 .

[6]  Sally Morris,et al.  Learned societies and open access: key results from surveys of bioscience societies and researchers , 2009 .

[7]  Alma Swan,et al.  Authors and electronic publishing: what authors want from the new technology , 2003, Learn. Publ..

[8]  Salvatore Mele,et al.  Information resources in High-Energy Physics: Surveying the present landscape and charting the future course , 2009 .

[9]  Robert Campbell,et al.  Author's version vs. publisher's version: an analysis of the copy‐editing function , 2007, Learn. Publ..

[10]  Lei Wu,et al.  Scholarly journal information‐seeking and reading patterns of faculty at five US universities , 2009, Learn. Publ..

[11]  Ellen Finnie Duranceau,et al.  The “Wealth of Networks” and Institutional Repositories: MIT, DSpace, and the Future of the Scholarly Commons , 2009, Libr. Trends.

[12]  Sarah Watson,et al.  Authors' attitudes to, and awareness and use of, a university institutional repository. , 2007 .

[13]  Alma Swan,et al.  Authors and open access publishing , 2004, Learn. Publ..

[14]  Peter Igo-Kemenes,et al.  First results of the SOAP project. Open access publishing in 2010 , 2010, ArXiv.