Direct reconstruction of parametric images for brain PET with event-by-event motion correction: evaluation in two tracers across count levels

Parametric images for dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) are typically generated by an indirect method, i.e. reconstructing a time series of emission images, then fitting a kinetic model to each voxel time activity curve. Alternatively, 'direct reconstruction', incorporates the kinetic model into the reconstruction algorithm itself, directly producing parametric images from projection data. Direct reconstruction has been shown to achieve parametric images with lower standard error than the indirect method. Here, we present direct reconstruction for brain PET using event-by-event motion correction of list-mode data, applied to two tracers. Event-by-event motion correction was implemented for direct reconstruction in the Parametric Motion-compensation OSEM List-mode Algorithm for Resolution-recovery reconstruction. The direct implementation was tested on simulated and human datasets with tracers [11C]AFM (serotonin transporter) and [11C]UCB-J (synaptic density), which follow the 1-tissue compartment model. Rigid head motion was tracked with the Vicra system. Parametric images of K 1 and distribution volume (V T  =  K 1/k 2) were compared to those generated by the indirect method by regional coefficient of variation (CoV). Performance across count levels was assessed using sub-sampled datasets. For simulated and real datasets at high counts, the two methods estimated K 1 and V T with comparable accuracy. At lower count levels, the direct method was substantially more robust to outliers than the indirect method. Compared to the indirect method, direct reconstruction reduced regional K 1 CoV by 35-48% (simulated dataset), 39-43% ([11C]AFM dataset) and 30-36% ([11C]UCB-J dataset) across count levels (averaged over regions at matched iteration); V T CoV was reduced by 51-58%, 54-60% and 30-46%, respectively. Motion correction played an important role in the dataset with larger motion: correction increased regional V T by 51% on average in the [11C]UCB-J dataset. Direct reconstruction of dynamic brain PET with event-by-event motion correction is achievable and dramatically more robust to noise in V T images than the indirect method.

[1]  L. Shepp,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Emission Tomography , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  K. Lange,et al.  EM reconstruction algorithms for emission and transmission tomography. , 1984, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[3]  D. Bailey,et al.  The direct calculation of parametric images from dynamic PET data using maximum-likelihood iterative reconstruction. , 1997 .

[4]  Vincent J. Cunningham,et al.  Parametric Imaging of Ligand-Receptor Binding in PET Using a Simplified Reference Region Model , 1997, NeuroImage.

[5]  B. Lopresti,et al.  Implementation and performance of an optical motion tracking system for high resolution brain PET imaging , 1998, 1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record. 1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (Cat. No.98CH36255).

[6]  C. C. Watson.  New, faster, image-based scatter correction for 3D PET , 1999 .

[7]  S. Libutti,et al.  Parametric images of blood flow in oncology PET studies using [15O]water. , 2000, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[8]  N. Tzourio-Mazoyer,et al.  Automated Anatomical Labeling of Activations in SPM Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the MNI MRI Single-Subject Brain , 2002, NeuroImage.

[9]  Jeih-San Liow,et al.  Design of a motion-compensation OSEM list-mode algorithm for resolution-recovery reconstruction for the HRRT , 2003, 2003 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37515).

[10]  W.C. Barker,et al.  Software architecture of the MOLAR-HRRT reconstruction engine , 2004, IEEE Symposium Conference Record Nuclear Science 2004..

[11]  Ken D. Sauer,et al.  Direct reconstruction of kinetic parameter images from dynamic PET data , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  Kris Thielemans,et al.  Correction of head movement on PET studies: comparison of methods. , 2006, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[13]  Jinyi Qi,et al.  Calculation of the Sensitivity Image in List-Mode Reconstruction for PET , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[14]  Jeff Kershaw,et al.  PET kinetic analysis: wavelet denoising of dynamic PET data with application to parametric imaging , 2007, Annals of nuclear medicine.

[15]  R. P. Maguire,et al.  Consensus Nomenclature for in vivo Imaging of Reversibly Binding Radioligands , 2007, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[16]  Guobao Wang,et al.  Iterative nonlinear least squares algorithms for direct reconstruction of parametric images from dynamic PET , 2008, 2008 5th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[17]  Kris Thielemans,et al.  A survey of approaches for direct parametric image reconstruction in emission tomography. , 2008, Medical physics.

[18]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Four-dimensional (4D) image reconstruction strategies in dynamic PET: beyond conventional independent frame reconstruction. , 2009, Medical physics.

[19]  Richard E. Carson,et al.  Initial evaluation of direct 4D parametric reconstruction with human PET data , 2009, 2009 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[20]  Georgios I. Angelis,et al.  Impact of erroneous kinetic model formulation in Direct 4D image reconstruction , 2011, 2011 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[21]  Richard E. Carson,et al.  Direct 4-D PET List Mode Parametric Reconstruction With a Novel EM Algorithm , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[22]  Wufan Chen,et al.  3.5D dynamic PET image reconstruction incorporating kinetics-based clusters , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[23]  Charles A Mistretta,et al.  Improved kinetic analysis of dynamic PET data with optimized HYPR-LR. , 2012, Medical physics.

[24]  Andrew J. Reader,et al.  Direct 4D PET reconstruction of parametric images into a stereotaxic brain atlas for [11C]raclopride , 2012, 2012 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[25]  Andrew J. Reader,et al.  Direct 4D PET MLEM reconstruction of parametric images using the simplified reference tissue model with the basis function method , 2013, 2013 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (2013 NSS/MIC).

[26]  Richard E Carson,et al.  Tracer Kinetic Modeling of [11C]AFM, a New PET Imaging Agent for the Serotonin Transporter , 2008, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[27]  Guobao Wang,et al.  Direct Estimation of Kinetic Parametric Images for Dynamic PET , 2013, Theranostics.

[28]  Xiao Jin,et al.  Evaluation of motion correction methods in human brain PET imaging--a simulation study based on human motion data. , 2013, Medical physics.

[29]  Chi Liu,et al.  Direct EM reconstruction of kinetic parameters from list-mode cardiac PET , 2014, 2014 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC).

[30]  A. Reader,et al.  4D image reconstruction for emission tomography , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[31]  Martin A Lodge,et al.  Quantitative myocardial perfusion PET parametric imaging at the voxel-level , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[32]  D. Spencer,et al.  Imaging synaptic density in the living human brain , 2016, Science Translational Medicine.

[33]  Jieqing Jiao,et al.  Direct Parametric Reconstruction With Joint Motion Estimation/Correction for Dynamic Brain PET Data , 2017, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.