The Effect of Dynamic and Static Choice Sets on Political Decision Making: An Analysis Using the Decision Board Platform

Previous studies of political decision making have used only “static” choice sets, where alternatives are “fixed” and are a priori known to the decision maker. We assess the effect of a dynamic choice set (new alternatives appear during the decision process) on strategy selection and choice in international politics. We suggest that decision makers use a mixture of decision strategies when making decisions in a two-stage process consisting of an initial screening of available alternatives, and a selection of the best one from the subset of remaining alternatives. To test the effects of dynamic and static choice sets on the decision process we introduce a computer-based “process tracer” in a study of top-ranking officers in the U.S. Air Force. The results show that (1) national security decision makers use a mixture of strategies in arriving at a decision, and (2) strategy selection and choice are significantly influenced by the structure of the choice set (static versus dynamic).

[1]  Alex Mintz,et al.  The Decision to Attack Iraq , 1993 .

[2]  Paul A. Anderson,et al.  Decision Making by Objection and the Cuban Missile Crisis , 1983 .

[3]  D. Green,et al.  Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory: A Critique of Applications in Political Science , 1994 .

[4]  I. Simonson,et al.  Choice Based on Reasons: The Case of Attraction and Compromise Effects , 1989 .

[5]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Adaptive Strategy Selection in Decision Making. , 1988 .

[6]  P. Tetlock,et al.  Accountability: a social magnifier of the dilution effect. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  H. J. Einhorn,et al.  Linear regression and process-tracing models of judgment. , 1979 .

[8]  B. Dosher,et al.  Strategies for multiattribute binary choice. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  P. Tetlock The Impact of Accountability on Judgment and Choice: Toward A Social Contingency Model , 1992 .

[10]  John H. Lingle,et al.  Cognitive Organization of Person Impressions. , 1979 .

[11]  Alexander L. George,et al.  Presidential Decisionmaking In Foreign Policy: The Effective Use Of Information And Advice , 1980 .

[12]  Neal Schmitt,et al.  The Effects of Alternative Labels on Decision Behavior: The Case of Corporate Site Selection Decisions , 1994 .

[13]  T. Clifton Morgan,et al.  Domestic Discontent and the External Use of Force , 1992 .

[14]  John A. Herstein Keeping the voter's limits in mind: A cognitive process analysis of decision making in voting. , 1981 .

[15]  Richard W. Olshavsky,et al.  Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: A replication and extension , 1979 .

[16]  Ola Svenson,et al.  Theoretical and Empirical Approaches to Behavioral Decision Making and Their Relation to Time Constraints , 1993 .

[17]  John W. Payne,et al.  Contingent decision behavior. , 1982 .

[18]  Ole R. Holsti,et al.  The belief system and national images: a case study , 1962 .

[19]  Michael D. Wallace,et al.  Changes in Integrative Complexity Among Middle East Leaders During the Persian Gulf Crisis , 1993 .

[20]  Robert S. Billings,et al.  The effects of response mode and importance on decision-making strategies: Judgment versus choice , 1988 .

[21]  Lewis W. Snider,et al.  From Desert Shield To Desert Storm: Success, Strife, Or Quagmire? , 1994 .

[22]  H. Himmelweit How Voters Decide , 1984 .

[23]  G. Allison Conceptual Models and the Cuban Missile Crisis , 1969, American Political Science Review.

[24]  O. Svenson Process descriptions of decision making. , 1979 .

[25]  N. Liang Decision Making: Alternatives to Rational Choice Models , 1994 .

[26]  H. Arkes Costs and benefits of judgment errors: Implications for debiasing. , 1991 .

[27]  D. Bailey,et al.  The effects of stress. , 1977, NLN publications.

[28]  I. Janis,et al.  Decision Making during International Crises , 1987 .

[29]  J. Payne,et al.  Adding Asymmetrically Dominated Alternatives: Violations of Regularity & the Similarity Hypothesis. , 1981 .

[30]  E. Riggle,et al.  Age difference in political decision making: Strategies for evaluating political candidates , 1996 .

[31]  H. Arkes,et al.  The Psychology of Sunk Cost , 1985 .

[32]  Marc D. Street Groupthink , 1997 .

[33]  S. Fiske,et al.  The novice and the expert: Knowledge-based strategies in political cognition , 1983 .

[34]  David A. Schkade,et al.  Numeric and linguistic information representation in multiattribute choice , 1991 .

[35]  G. Keinan Decision making under stress: scanning of alternatives under controllable and uncontrollable threats. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[36]  A. Mintz,et al.  The Political Incentive Explanation of ‘Democratic Peace’: Evidence From Experimental Research , 1993 .

[37]  B. Grofman Information, participation, and choice : an economic theory of democracy in perspective , 1994 .

[38]  A. Downs,et al.  The economic approach to politics : a critical reassessment of the theory of rational action , 1991 .

[39]  L. Beach,et al.  A Contingency Model for the Selection of Decision Strategies , 1978 .

[40]  J. Stein,et al.  Rational decision-making : Israel's security choices, 1967 , 1980 .

[41]  R. Abelson Decision making and decision theory , 1985 .

[42]  Patrick James,et al.  The Influence of Domestic and International Politics on the President's Use of Force , 1991 .

[43]  Robert P. Abelson,et al.  The semantics of asking a favor: How to succeed in getting help without really dying. , 1972 .

[44]  J. Ford,et al.  Process tracing methods: Contributions, problems, and neglected research questions , 1989 .

[45]  John W. Payne,et al.  The adaptive decision maker: Name index , 1993 .

[46]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  The adaptive decision maker , 1993 .

[47]  Paul M. Sniderman,et al.  Reasoning and Choice: The principle–policy puzzle: the paradox of American racial attitudes , 1991 .

[48]  Sam C. Brown,et al.  Comparison of measures for the estimation of clustering in free recall. , 1971 .

[49]  John H. Aldrich,et al.  Individual and Contextual Variations in Political Candidate Appraisal , 1994, American Political Science Review.

[50]  Brian L. Job,et al.  The President and the Political Use of Force , 1986, American Political Science Review.

[51]  Mary Zey-Ferrell,et al.  Decision making : alternatives to rational choice models , 1992 .