Multimodality Imaging Assessment of Prosthetic Heart Valves

Echocardiography and fluoroscopy are the main techniques for prosthetic heart valve (PHV) evaluation, but because of specific limitations they may not identify the morphological substrate or the extent of PHV pathology. Cardiac computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have emerged as new potential imaging modalities for valve prostheses. We present an overview of the possibilities and pitfalls of CT and MRI for PHV assessment based on a systematic literature review of all experimental and patient studies. For this, a comprehensive systematic search was performed in PubMed and Embase on March 24, 2015, containing CT/MRI and PHV synonyms. Our final selection yielded 82 articles on surgical valves. CT allowed adequate assessment of most modern PHVs and complemented echocardiography in detecting the obstruction cause (pannus or thrombus), bioprosthesis calcifications, and endocarditis extent (valve dehiscence and pseudoaneurysms). No clear advantage over echocardiography was found for the detection of vegetations or periprosthetic regurgitation. Whereas MRI metal artifacts may preclude direct prosthesis analysis, MRI provided information on PHV-related flow patterns and velocities. MRI demonstrated abnormal asymmetrical flow patterns in PHV obstruction and allowed prosthetic regurgitation assessment. Hence, CT shows great clinical relevance as a complementary imaging tool for the diagnostic work-up of patients with suspected PHV obstruction and endocarditis. MRI shows potential for functional PHV assessment although more studies are required to provide diagnostic reference values to allow discrimination of normal from pathological conditions.

[1]  André Plass,et al.  Multislice computed tomography in infective endocarditis: comparison with transesophageal echocardiography and intraoperative findings. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  H. Teshima,et al.  Evaluation of prosthetic valve obstruction on electrocardiographically gated multidetector-row computed tomography--identification of subprosthetic pannus in the aortic position. , 2013, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.

[3]  Philippe Pibarot,et al.  A new index measured by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging to detect mechanical heart valve malfunction , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[4]  V. Hjortdal,et al.  Aortic root distensibility and cross-sectional areas in stented and subcoronary stentless bioprostheses in pigs. , 2010, Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery.

[5]  Yoshiki Sawa,et al.  Mid-term results of freestyle aortic stentless bioprosthetic valve: clinical impact of quantitative analysis of in-vivo three-dimensional flow velocity profile by magnetic resonance imaging. , 2005, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[6]  M. Thelen,et al.  In vitro investigation of prosthetic heart valves in magnetic resonance imaging: evaluation of potential hazards. , 2001, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[7]  R. Ordidge,et al.  Translational and rotational forces on heart valve prostheses subjected ex vivo to a 4.7‐T MR system , 2002, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[8]  M. Prokop,et al.  Multidetector-row computed tomography imaging characteristics of mechanical prosthetic valves. , 2011, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[9]  J. Takkenberg,et al.  Will heart valve tissue engineering change the world? , 2005, Nature Clinical Practice Cardiovascular Medicine.

[10]  M. Nishino,et al.  Impact of 64 multi-detector computed tomography for the evaluation of aortic paraprosthetic regurgitation. , 2011, Journal of cardiology.

[11]  B. Gerber,et al.  Stentless xenografts as an alternative to pulmonary homografts in the Ross operation. , 2013, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[12]  P. Walker,et al.  Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and Laser Doppler Anemometry velocity measurements downstream of replacement heart valves: implications for in vivo assessment of prosthetic valve function. , 1996, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[13]  B. Gerber,et al.  Evaluation of anatomic valve opening and leaflet morphology in aortic valve bioprosthesis by using multidetector CT: comparison with transthoracic echocardiography. , 2010, Radiology.

[14]  W. Strugnell,et al.  CryoLife-O'Brien stentless valve: 10-year results of 402 implants. , 2005, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[15]  W. Konertz,et al.  Ten years of clinical results with a tissue-engineered pulmonary valve. , 2011, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[16]  Cheul Lee,et al.  Bicuspid pulmonary valve implantation using polytetrafluoroethylene membrane: early results and assessment of the valve function by magnetic resonance imaging. , 2013, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[17]  J. Reitsma,et al.  Are novel non-invasive imaging techniques needed in patients with suspected prosthetic heart valve endocarditis? A systematic review and meta-analysis , 2015, European Radiology.

[18]  M. Markl,et al.  Blood flow characteristics in the ascending aorta after aortic valve replacement--a pilot study using 4D-flow MRI. , 2014, International journal of cardiology.

[19]  W. Mali,et al.  Cardiac computed tomography angiography results in diagnostic and therapeutic change in prosthetic heart valve endocarditis , 2014, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[20]  Michael Zink,et al.  Influence of a tilting prosthetic mitral valve orientation on the left ventricular flow - an experimental in vivo magnetic resonance imaging study. , 2007, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[21]  F G Shellock,et al.  High-field-strength MR imaging and metallic biomedical implants: an ex vivo evaluation of deflection forces. , 1988, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[22]  M. Quail,et al.  Use of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging for TAVR assessment in patients with bioprosthetic aortic valves: comparison with computed tomography. , 2012, European journal of radiology.

[23]  F. von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff,et al.  Assessment of mitral bioprostheses using cardiovascular magnetic resonance , 2010, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[24]  E. Scalzetti,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of prosthetic cardiac valves in vitro and in vivo. , 1988, The American journal of cardiology.

[25]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[26]  J. Després,et al.  Determinants of aortic bioprosthetic valve calcification assessed by multidetector CT , 2015, Heart.

[27]  A. Tajik,et al.  Reoperation for prosthetic aortic valve obstruction in the era of echocardiography: trends in diagnostic testing and comparison with surgical findings. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[28]  O. Bech-Hanssen,et al.  ECG-gated computed tomography: a new role for patients with suspected aortic prosthetic valve endocarditis , 2012, European Radiology.

[29]  Andreas Melzer,et al.  Experimental MRI visible resonant prosthetic heart valves , 2009, Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy.

[30]  D. Leong,et al.  Early effects of transcatheter aortic valve implantation and aortic valve replacement on myocardial function and aortic valve hemodynamics: insights from cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. , 2015, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[31]  Damien Garcia,et al.  What do you mean by aortic valve area: geometric orifice area, effective orifice area, or gorlin area? , 2006, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[32]  Y. Eshet,et al.  The role of ECG-gated MDCT in the evaluation of aortic and mitral mechanical valves: initial experience. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[33]  René M. Botnar,et al.  High-resolution assessment of velocity fields and shear stresses distal to prosthetic heart valves using high-field magnetic resonance imaging. , 1999, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[34]  J. Chambers,et al.  Prosthetic heart valves , 2014, International journal of clinical practice.

[35]  W G Henderson,et al.  Outcomes 15 years after valve replacement with a mechanical versus a bioprosthetic valve: final report of the Veterans Affairs randomized trial. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[36]  W. Mali,et al.  A novel iterative reconstruction algorithm allows reduced dose multidetector-row CT imaging of mechanical prosthetic heart valves , 2011, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[37]  W. Mali,et al.  CT attenuation measurements are valuable to discriminate pledgets used in prosthetic heart valve implantation from paravalvular leakage. , 2012, The British journal of radiology.

[38]  Michael S Sacks,et al.  In vivo monitoring of function of autologous engineered pulmonary valve. , 2010, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[39]  M Coulomb,et al.  [Effects of the magnetic field in magnetic resonance imaging on 15 tested cardiac valve prostheses]. , 1986, Journal de radiologie.

[40]  M. Prokop,et al.  Comparison of multidetector-row computed tomography to echocardiography and fluoroscopy for evaluation of patients with mechanical prosthetic valve obstruction. , 2009, The American journal of cardiology.

[41]  T. Leiner,et al.  The impact of a new model-based iterative reconstruction algorithm on prosthetic heart valve related artifacts at reduced radiation dose MDCT , 2014, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[42]  S. Jung,et al.  The Measurement of Opening Angle and Orifice Area of a Bileaflet Mechanical Valve Using Multidetector Computed Tomography , 2009, Korean circulation journal.

[43]  Thoralf M Sundt,et al.  2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[44]  R. Ordidge,et al.  Assessment of magnetic field (4.7 T) induced forces on prosthetic heart valves and annuloplasty rings , 2005, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[45]  F G Shellock,et al.  Prosthetic heart valves and annuloplasty rings: assessment of magnetic field interactions, heating, and artifacts at 1.5 Tesla. , 2001, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[46]  W. Mali,et al.  Coronary artery assessment by multidetector computed tomography in patients with prosthetic heart valves , 2011, European Radiology.

[47]  R. Budde,et al.  Multidetector-Row Computed Tomography Allows Accurate Measurement of Mechanical Prosthetic Heart Valve Leaflet Closing Angles Compared With Fluoroscopy , 2014, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[48]  P Boesiger,et al.  Visualization of flow patterns distal to aortic valve prostheses in humans using a fast approach for cine 3D velocity mapping , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[49]  Stephen H. Little,et al.  Development of a Multi-modality Compatible Flow Loop System for the Functional Assessment of Mitral Valve Prostheses , 2014 .

[50]  E. M. Pedersen,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of blood velocity distribution around St. Jude medical aortic valves in patients. , 1996, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[51]  E. M. Pedersen,et al.  Heart motion-adapted MR velocity mapping of blood velocity distribution downstream of aortic valve prostheses: initial experience. , 2001, Radiology.

[52]  Helmut Baumgartner,et al.  Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease The Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology , 2007 .

[53]  Thoralf M Sundt,et al.  2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. , 2014, Circulation.

[54]  Petter Dyverfeldt,et al.  In vitro assessment of flow patterns and turbulence intensity in prosthetic heart valves using generalized phase‐contrast MRI , 2010, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[55]  A. Furber,et al.  CMR assessment after a transapical-transcatheter aortic valve implantation. , 2014, European journal of radiology.

[56]  M. Prokop,et al.  Prospective ECG triggering reduces prosthetic heart valve-induced artefacts compared with retrospective ECG gating on 256-slice CT , 2011, European Radiology.

[57]  Inga Voges,et al.  Adverse results of a decellularized tissue-engineered pulmonary valve in humans assessed with magnetic resonance imaging. , 2013, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[58]  U. Sechtem,et al.  Magnetresonanztomographie bei Patienten mit Herzklappenersatz , 1991 .

[59]  H. Alkadhi,et al.  Evaluation of biological aortic valve prostheses by dual source computer tomography and anatomic measurements for potential transapical valve-in-valve procedure. , 2007, Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery.

[60]  H. Wei,et al.  Correctness of multi-detector-row computed tomography for diagnosing mechanical prosthetic heart valve disorders using operative findings as a gold standard , 2009, European Radiology.

[61]  Bijoy K Khandheria,et al.  Recommendations for evaluation of prosthetic valves with echocardiography and doppler ultrasound: a report From the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Task Force on Prosthetic Valves, developed in conjunction with the American College of Cardiology Card , 2009, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[62]  R. Lange,et al.  A new treatment option for pulmonary valvar insufficiency: first experiences with implantation of a self-expanding stented valve without use of cardiopulmonary bypass. , 2007, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[63]  V. Pineda,et al.  "Pulmonary valve replacement diminishes the presence of restrictive physiology and reduces atrial volumes": a prospective study in Tetralogy of Fallot patients. , 2014, International Journal of Cardiology.

[64]  Tal Geva,et al.  Right ventricular remodeling after pulmonary valve replacement: early gains, late losses. , 2015, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[65]  H. Teshima,et al.  Usefulness of a multidetector-row computed tomography scanner for detecting pannus formation. , 2004, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[66]  M. Al-Murayeh,et al.  Low radiation dose non-contrast cardiac CT: is it of value in the evaluation of mechanical aortic valve , 2012, Acta radiologica.

[67]  Frank G Shellock,et al.  Biomedical implants and devices: Assessment of magnetic field interactions with a 3.0‐Tesla MR system , 2002, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[68]  A P Yoganathan,et al.  Magnetic resonance velocity imaging: a new method for prosthetic heart valve study. , 1995, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[69]  René M. Botnar,et al.  Assessment of prosthetic aortic valve performance by magnetic resonance velocity imaging , 2000, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[70]  O. Alfieri,et al.  Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease. , 2007, European heart journal.

[71]  U. Sechtem,et al.  Regurgitant flow in cardiac valve prostheses: diagnostic value of gradient echo nuclear magnetic resonance imaging in reference to transesophageal two-dimensional color Doppler echocardiography. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[72]  H. Teshima,et al.  Evaluation of advancing the standard valve dysfunction by multidetector-row CT , 2014, Journal of Artificial Organs.

[73]  J. Després,et al.  ApoB/ApoA-I ratio is associated with increased risk of bioprosthetic valve degeneration. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[74]  F. von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff,et al.  In vitro assessment of heart valve bioprostheses by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: four-dimensional mapping of flow patterns and orifice area planimetry. , 2011, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[75]  E. Di Cesare,et al.  Low-field magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of mechanical and biological heart valve function. , 1995, European journal of radiology.

[76]  J F Heautot,et al.  CT-scan images preprocessing and segmentation to improve bioprosthesis leaflets morphological analysis. , 2013, Medical hypotheses.

[77]  J. Bennetts,et al.  Durability of hand-sewn valves in the right ventricular outlet. , 2008, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[78]  R. V. D. van den Brink,et al.  Differentiation of thrombus from pannus as the cause of acquired mechanical prosthetic heart valve obstruction by non-invasive imaging: a review of the literature. , 2014, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.

[79]  P. Stella,et al.  Assessment of a transcatheter heart valve prosthesis with multidetector computed tomography: in vitro and in vivo imaging characteristics , 2013, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[80]  I. Tsai,et al.  Pseudoaneurysm in the left ventricular outflow tract after prosthetic aortic valve implantation: evaluation upon multidetector-row computed tomography. , 2009, Texas Heart Institute journal.

[81]  W. Mali,et al.  Reliability, Agreement, and Presentation of a Reference Standard for Assessing Implanted Heart Valve Sizes by Multidetector-Row Computed Tomography. , 2015, The American journal of cardiology.

[82]  L. Kadem,et al.  Purely phase-encoded MRI of turbulent flow through a dysfunctional bileaflet mechanical heart valve , 2014, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[83]  W. Konertz,et al.  Mid-term clinical results using a tissue-engineered pulmonary valve to reconstruct the right ventricular outflow tract during the Ross procedure. , 2007, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[84]  M. Prokop,et al.  Multidetector CT imaging of mechanical prosthetic heart valves: quantification of artifacts with a pulsatile in-vitro model , 2011, European Radiology.

[85]  T F Budinger,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of prosthetic heart valves. , 1985, Radiology.

[86]  René M. Botnar,et al.  Prosthetic heart valve evaluation by magnetic resonance imaging. , 1999, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[87]  W. Mali,et al.  Prosthetic heart valve assessment with multidetector-row CT: imaging characteristics of 91 valves in 83 patients , 2011, European Radiology.

[88]  E. Tay,et al.  Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Durability of Clinical and Hemodynamic Outcomes Beyond 3 Years in a Large Patient Cohort , 2010, Circulation.

[89]  Thoralf M Sundt,et al.  2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[90]  Tim Leiner,et al.  Artifact reduction strategies for prosthetic heart valve CT imaging , 2012, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[91]  G. Santambrogio,et al.  Incorrect echocardiographic diagnosis in patients with mechanical prosthetic valve dysfunction: correlation with surgical findings. , 2000, The American journal of medicine.

[92]  E. Kazerooni,et al.  Hemodynamic and functional assessment of mechanical aortic valves using combined echocardiography and multidetector computed tomography. , 2009, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[93]  F G Shellock,et al.  Prosthetic heart valves: Evaluation of magnetic field interactions, heating, and artifacts at 1.5 T , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[94]  S. Yoshida,et al.  Mechanical valve evaluation with four-dimensional computed tomography. , 2013, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[95]  E. Kazerooni,et al.  Evaluation of mechanical heart valve size and function with ECG-gated 64-MDCT. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[96]  In vitro behaviour of mechanical heart valves in a 1.5 T superconducting magnet , 1992, European Radiology.

[97]  F. von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff,et al.  Feasibility of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance to Assess the Orifice Area of Aortic Bioprostheses , 2009, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.