Visualizing model mappings in UML

Whenever multiple representations or models of a system exist, there is the possibility of defining how they relate. In model driven software development, it is essential that these mappings are defined precisely and automated as far as possible: they form the basis for generation of code and other models from a model, for reconciliation and management of consistency between models, and even for the definition of modeling languages themselves. A standard way of defining software modeling languages is metamodeling, which involves the construction of an object model of the syntax and, optionally, semantics of the language, using the diagrammatic syntax of the Unified Modeling Language (UML). This paper proposes an extension to UML for expressing mappings between models using diagrams, and illustrates how the extension can be used in metamodeling. The extension is inspired by mathematical relations and corrects a deficiency in the concept of association in class diagrams. The notation of object diagrams is also extended to allow particular instances of a relation to be presented.

[1]  Bernhard Rumpe,et al.  Modeling Languages: Syntax, Semantics and All That Stuff, Part I: The Basic Stuff , 2000 .

[2]  Nikolai Mansurov,et al.  Using declarative mapping for automatic code generation from SDL and ASN.1 , 1999, SDL Forum.

[3]  Alain Wegmann,et al.  Strengthening MDA by Drawing from the Living Systems Theory , 2002 .

[4]  Heiko Dörr,et al.  Requirements to a Framework for sustainable Integration of System Development Tools , 2002 .

[5]  Jim Welsh,et al.  Towards pattern-based design recovery , 2002, ICSE '02.

[6]  Ruven E. Brooks,et al.  Towards a Theory of the Comprehension of Computer Programs , 1983, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[7]  Reiko Heckel,et al.  Consistency-Preserving Model Evolution through Transformations , 2002, UML.

[8]  Stuart Kent,et al.  Constraint diagrams: visualizing invariants in object-oriented models , 1997, OOPSLA '97.

[9]  Gianna Reggio,et al.  Consistency Problems in UML-Based Software Development , 2004, UML Satellite Activities.

[10]  Stuart Kent,et al.  Constraint Diagrams: Visualizing Invariants in OO Modelling , 1997, OOPSLA 1997.

[11]  Perdita Stevens On the interpretation of binary associations in the Unified Modelling Language , 2002, Software and Systems Modeling.

[12]  Andy Schürr,et al.  Specification of Graph Translators with Triple Graph Grammars , 1994, WG.

[13]  Reiko Heckel,et al.  Extended Model Relations with Graphical Consistency Conditions , 2002 .

[14]  David Notkin,et al.  Software reflexion models: bridging the gap between source and high-level models , 1995, SIGSOFT FSE.

[15]  Stuart Kent,et al.  A Relational Approach to Defining Transformations in a Metamodel , 2002, UML.

[16]  Philip A. Bernstein,et al.  A vision for management of complex models , 2000, SGMD.

[17]  Axel Uhl,et al.  Model-Driven Architecture , 2002, OOIS Workshops.

[18]  Gabriele Taentzer,et al.  A Visualization of OCL Using Collaborations , 2001, UML.

[19]  Elke A. Rundensteiner,et al.  Sangam - a solution to support multiple data models, their mappings and maintenance , 2001, SIGMOD '01.

[20]  QVT Partners Initial submission for MOF 2.0 Query / Views / Transformations RFP , 2003 .