Perception of amplitude modulation by hearing-impaired listeners: the audibility of component modulation and detection of phase change in three-component modulators.

Two experiments were conducted to assess whether hearing-impaired listeners have a reduced ability to process suprathreshold complex patterns of modulation applied to a 4-kHz sinusoidal carrier. Experiment 1 examined the ability to "hear out" the modulation frequency of the central component of a three-component modulator, using the method described by Sek and Moore [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 113, 2801-2811 (2003)]. Scores were around 70-80% correct when the components in the three-component modulator were widely spaced and when the frequencies of the target and comparison different sufficiently, but decreased when the components in the modulator were closely spaced. Experiment 2 examined the ability to hear a change in the relative phase of the components in a three-component modulator with harmonically spaced components. The frequency of the central component, f, was either 50 or 100 Hz. Scores were about 70% correct when the component spacing was < or = 0.5fc, but decreased markedly for greater spacings. Performance was only slightly impaired by randomizing the overall modulation depth from one stimulus to the next. For both experiments, performance was only slightly worse than for normally hearing listeners, indicating that cochlear hearing loss does not markedly affect the ability to process suprathreshold complex patterns of modulation.

[1]  R. Plomp Noise, Amplification, and Compression: Considerations of Three Main Issues in Hearing Aid Design , 1994, Ear and hearing.

[2]  B. Moore An introduction to the psychology of hearing, 3rd ed. , 1989 .

[3]  J. Lee Amplitude modulation rate discrimination with sinusoidal carriers. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  T. Dau,et al.  Spectro-temporal processing in the envelope-frequency domain. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  B. Moore,et al.  Estimation of the level and phase of the simple distortion tone the modulation domain. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  R V Shannon,et al.  Speech Recognition with Primarily Temporal Cues , 1995, Science.

[7]  Brian C. J. Moore,et al.  Effect of loudness recruitment on the perception of amplitude modulation , 1996 .

[8]  A. Sęk,et al.  Discrimination of the amplitude modulation rate , 2002 .

[9]  F Berthommier,et al.  Discrimination of amplitude-modulation phase spectrum. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  Stefan Uppenkamp,et al.  The effects of temporal asymmetry on the detection and perception of short chirps 1 1 Parts of this study were presented during the 12th International Symposium on Hearing 2000 in Mierlo/NL (Uppenkamp et al., 2001). , 2001, Hearing Research.

[11]  B C Moore,et al.  Further evaluation of a model of loudness perception applied to cochlear hearing loss. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  B. Moore,et al.  A revised model of loudness perception applied to cochlear hearing loss , 2004, Hearing Research.

[13]  David R. Soderquist Frequency analysis and the critical band , 1970 .

[14]  Modulation masking in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. , 1997, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[15]  Magdalena Wojtczak,et al.  Forward masking of amplitude modulation: basic characteristics. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  W. Shofner,et al.  Responses of ventral cochlear nucleus units in the chinchilla to amplitude modulation by low-frequency, two-tone complexes. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  Mark B. Gardner,et al.  The Dependence of Hearing Impairment on Sound Intensity , 1937 .

[18]  M R Leek,et al.  Modulation rate detection and discrimination by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  Patrick Chauvel,et al.  Temporal envelope processing in the human left and right auditory cortices. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[20]  C. Formby Frequency and rate discrimination by Menière patients. , 1986, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[21]  B C Moore,et al.  Modulation masking produced by beating modulators. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  N. Viemeister,et al.  Cues for discrimination of envelopes. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  Christian Füllgrabe,et al.  Effect of cochlear damage on the detection of complex temporal envelopes , 2003, Hearing Research.

[24]  Modulation masking produced by complex tone modulators. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  T. Dau Modeling auditory processing of amplitude modulation , 1997 .

[26]  B C Moore,et al.  Auditory filter shapes in subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear impairments. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  L. Robles,et al.  Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea. , 2001, Physiological reviews.

[28]  C. Darwin Auditory grouping , 1997, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[29]  C W Turner,et al.  Use of temporal envelope cues in speech recognition by normal and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  Adrian Rees,et al.  Responses of neurons in the inferior colliculus of the rat to AM and FM tones , 1983, Hearing Research.

[31]  Kohlrausch,et al.  The influence of carrier level and frequency on modulation and beat-detection thresholds for sinusoidal carriers , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  Brian R Glasberg,et al.  Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data , 1990, Hearing Research.

[33]  E. Owens,et al.  An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing , 1997 .

[34]  B. Moore,et al.  Temporal modulation transfer functions for band-limited noise in subjects with cochlear hearing loss. , 1992, British journal of audiology.

[35]  B. Moore,et al.  Modulation masking produced by second-order modulators. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  B C Moore,et al.  Temporal modulation transfer functions obtained using sinusoidal carriers with normally hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  A. M. Mimpen,et al.  The ear as a frequency analyzer. II. , 1964, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[38]  S P Bacon,et al.  Modulation detection, modulation masking, and speech understanding in noise in the elderly. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[39]  Torsten Daub Modeling auditory processing of amplitude modulation I. Detection and masking with narrow-band carriers , 1997 .

[40]  R. Patterson,et al.  A pulse ribbon model of monaural phase perception. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[41]  L. Robles,et al.  Basilar-membrane responses to tones at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[42]  Measurement of first- and second-order modulation detection thresholds in listeners with cochlear hearing loss , 2001, British journal of audiology.

[43]  B C Moore,et al.  Audibility of partials in inharmonic complex tones. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[44]  T. Dau,et al.  Characterizing frequency selectivity for envelope fluctuations. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[45]  C. J. Darwin,et al.  Chapter 11 – Auditory Grouping , 1995 .

[46]  B. Kollmeier,et al.  Modeling auditory processing of amplitude modulation. II. Spectral and temporal integration. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[47]  R Plomp,et al.  Auditory handicap of hearing impairment and the limited benefit of hearing aids. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[48]  The role of envelope beat cues in the detection and discrimination of second-order amplitude modulation. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[49]  R. Plomp The Role of Modulation in Hearing , 1983 .

[50]  S. Bacon,et al.  Modulation detection in subjects with relatively flat hearing losses. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[51]  D. M. Green,et al.  Detection of partially filled gaps in noise and the temporal modulation transfer function. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[52]  B C Moore,et al.  The critical modulation frequency and its relationship to auditory filtering at low frequencies. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[53]  A. Wingfield,et al.  Speed of processing in normal aging: effects of speech rate, linguistic structure, and processing time. , 1985, Journal of gerontology.

[54]  C. Formby,et al.  Differential sensitivity to tonal frequency and to the rate of modulation of broad-band noise by hearing-impaired listeners , 1982 .

[55]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  Testing the concept of a modulation filter bank: the audibility of component modulation and detection of phase change in three-component modulators. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[56]  W. S. Rhode,et al.  Evidence from Mössbauer experiments for nonlinear vibration in the cochlea. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.