MRI of human tumor xenografts in vivo: proton relaxation times and extracellular tumor volume.

Proton T1 and T2 differ substantially between tumors, but the tumor properties causing heterogeneity in T1 and T2 have not been fully recognized. The purpose of the study reported here was to investigate whether differences in T1 and T2 between tumors are mainly a consequence of differences in the fractional volume of the extracellular compartment. The study was performed using a single human tumor xenograft line showing large naturally occurring intratumor heterogeneity in the size of the extracellular compartment. The size of the extracellular compartment was calculated from the volume and the density of the tumor cells. Cell volume was measured by an electronic particle counter. Cell density was determined by stereological analysis of histological preparations. T1 and T2 were measured by MRI in vivo both in the absence and presence of Gd-DTPA. Two spin-echo pulse sequences were used, one with a repetition time (TR) of 600 ms and echo times (TEs) of 20, 40, 60, and 80 ms and the other with a TR of 2,000 ms and TEs of 20, 40, 60, and 80 ms. Measurements of T1 and T2 in the presence of Gd-DTPA were performed in a state of semi-equilibrium between uptake and clearance of Gd-DTPA. MR-images and histological preparations of tumor subregions homogeneous in extracellular volume were analysed in pairs. The extracellular volume differed between tumor subregions from 5 to 70%. T1 and T2 measured in the absence of Gd-DTPA differed between tumor subregions by a factor of approximately 1.5 and increased with increasing extracellular volume. The relative decrease in T1 caused by Gd-DTPA, represented by (T1 control-T1 Gd-DTPA)/T1 control, also increased with increasing extracellular volume.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

[1]  G M Bydder,et al.  Effect of oxygen tension on NMR spin-lattice relaxation rate of blood in vivo. , 1984, Investigative radiology.

[2]  G D Fullerton,et al.  Characterization of proton NMR relaxation times in normal and pathological tissues by correlation with other tissue parameters. , 1984, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[3]  P. Okunieff,et al.  Blood flow, oxygen and nutrient supply, and metabolic microenvironment of human tumors: a review. , 1989, Cancer research.

[4]  R. Kallman Rodent tumor models in experimental cancer therapy , 1987 .

[5]  H Lyng,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of human melanoma xenografts in vivo: proton spin-lattice and spin-spin relaxation times versus fractional tumour water content and fraction of necrotic tumour tissue. , 1994, International journal of radiation biology.

[6]  P. Furmanski,et al.  1H-NMR relaxation times and water compartmentalization in experimental tumor models. , 1986, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[7]  R. Damadian Tumor Detection by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance , 1971, Science.

[8]  S. Medendorp,et al.  The response of the KHT sarcoma to radiotherapy as measured by water proton NMR relaxation times: relationships with tumor volume and water content. , 1991, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  R. Brasch,et al.  Characteristics of gadolinium-DTPA complex: a potential NMR contrast agent. , 1984, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  C. Hardy,et al.  A review of 1H nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation in pathology: are T1 and T2 diagnostic? , 1987, Medical physics.

[11]  J Chambron,et al.  NMR compartmentalization of free water in the perfused rat heart , 1985, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  Hans-Inge Peterson,et al.  Tumor Blood Circulation: Angiogenesis, Vascular Morphology and Blood Flow of Experimental and Human Tumors , 1979 .

[13]  T. Foster,et al.  A review of normal tissue hydrogen NMR relaxation times and relaxation mechanisms from 1-100 MHz: dependence on tissue type, NMR frequency, temperature, species, excision, and age. , 1984, Medical physics.

[14]  R K Jain,et al.  Interstitial pressure gradients in tissue-isolated and subcutaneous tumors: implications for therapy. , 1990, Cancer research.

[15]  R K Jain,et al.  Microvascular pressure is the principal driving force for interstitial hypertension in solid tumors: implications for vascular collapse. , 1992, Cancer research.

[16]  J. Economou,et al.  Nuclear magnetic resonance studies of cancer. IV. Correlation of water content with tissue relaxation times. , 1974, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[17]  Proton spin-lattice relaxation studies of tissue response to radiotherapy in mice. , 1983, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  T. Stokke,et al.  Establishment and characterization of six human melanoma xenograft lines , 1990, APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica.