Cardiovascular Biomarker Score and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Subanalysis of the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance Treatment decisions in atrial fibrillation (AF) are based on clinical assessment of risk. The CHA2DS2-VASc (cardiac failure or dysfunction, hypertension, age 65-74 [1 point] or ≥75 years [2 points], diabetes mellitus, and stroke, transient ischemic attack or thromboembolism [2 points]-vascular disease, and sex category [female]) risk score is pragmatic and widely used but has only moderate discrimination. Objective To develop and test a cardiovascular biomarker score for indication of risk in patients with AF. Design, Setting, and Participants The ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial was a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy clinical trial comparing 2 once-daily edoxaban dose regimens with warfarin in 21 105 patients with AF at moderate to high risk of stroke. This prespecified subanalysis was performed in 4880 patients enrolled at randomization in the biomarker substudy. Cardiac troponin I, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, and d-dimer levels were measured at baseline. A multimarker risk score was developed to determine the probability of stroke, systemic embolic events, or death by assigning tiered points for higher concentrations of the biomarkers. Main Outcomes and Measures Risk score and clinical outcomes based on cardiac troponin I, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, and d-dimer levels at baseline. Results Of the 5002 patients enrolled in the biomarker substudy of the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial, 4880 patients (97.6%) had all 3 biomarkers available at randomization (1820 [37.3%] were women; median [interquartile range] age, 71 [64-77] years). After adjustment for the CHA2DS2-VASc score, each biomarker was associated with a 2.8-fold to 4.2-fold gradient of risk comparing the highest vs lowest concentrations across groups of increasing concentrations (P < .001 for trend for each). The multimarker risk score identified a more than 15-fold gradient of risk after adjustment for CHA2DS2-VASc score. When added to the CHA2DS2-VASc score, the biomarker score significantly enhanced prognostic accuracy by improving the C statistic from 0.586 (95% CI, 0.565-0.607) to 0.708 (95% CI, 0.688-0.728) (P < .001) and reclassification with a net reclassification improvement of 59.4% (P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance A prototype multimarker risk score significantly enhanced risk assessment for stroke, systemic embolic events, or death compared with traditional clinical risk stratification. Incorporation of biomarkers into clinical decision making to define therapeutic management in AF warrants consideration. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00781391.

[1]  Claes Held,et al.  The ABC (age, biomarkers, clinical history) stroke risk score: a biomarker-based risk score for predicting stroke in atrial fibrillation , 2016, European heart journal.

[2]  G. Lip,et al.  Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: a systematic review. , 2015, JAMA.

[3]  G. Hindricks,et al.  What can rhythm control therapy contribute to prognosis in atrial fibrillation? , 2015, Heart.

[4]  M. Ezekowitz,et al.  2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. , 2014, Circulation.

[5]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Importance of persistent elevation of cardiac biomarkers in atrial fibrillation: a RE-LY substudy , 2014, Heart.

[6]  Alexander Parkhomenko,et al.  Comparison of the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomised trials , 2014, The Lancet.

[7]  D. Atar,et al.  High-sensitivity troponin T and risk stratification in patients with atrial fibrillation during treatment with apixaban or warfarin. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  E. Antman,et al.  Edoxaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  W. Abhayaratna,et al.  Effect of weight reduction and cardiometabolic risk factor management on symptom burden and severity in patients with atrial fibrillation: a randomized clinical trial. , 2013, JAMA.

[10]  D. Atar,et al.  High-Sensitivity Troponin I for Risk Assessment in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Insights From the Apixaban for Reduction in Stroke and Other Thromboembolic Events in Atrial Fibrillation (ARISTOTLE) Trial , 2013, Circulation.

[11]  G. Lip,et al.  The emerging role of biomarkers in atrial fibrillation. , 2013, The Canadian journal of cardiology.

[12]  S. Hohnloser,et al.  N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide for risk assessment in patients with atrial fibrillation: insights from the ARISTOTLE Trial (Apixaban for the Prevention of Stroke in Subjects With Atrial Fibrillation). , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  C. Granger,et al.  Biomarkers in atrial fibrillation: a clinical review. , 2013, European heart journal.

[14]  Gregory Y H Lip,et al.  Stroke and bleeding risk assessment in atrial fibrillation: when, how, and why? , 2013, European heart journal.

[15]  Gerhard Hindricks,et al.  2012 focused update of the ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: an update of the 2010 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation--developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association. , 2012, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[16]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  2012 focused update of the ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: an update of the 2010 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation. Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association. , 2012, European heart journal.

[17]  J. Olesen,et al.  The value of the CHA2DS2-VASc score for refining stroke risk stratification in patients with atrial fibrillation with a CHADS2 score 0–1: A nationwide cohort study , 2012, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[18]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Cardiac Biomarkers Are Associated With an Increased Risk of Stroke and Death in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy (RE-LY) Substudy , 2012, Circulation.

[19]  Dhaval Shah,et al.  Treatment of obstructive sleep apnea reduces the risk of atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  Ewout W Steyerberg,et al.  Extensions of net reclassification improvement calculations to measure usefulness of new biomarkers , 2011, Statistics in medicine.

[21]  E. Antman,et al.  Evaluation of the novel factor Xa inhibitor edoxaban compared with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: design and rationale for the Effective aNticoaGulation with factor xA next GEneration in Atrial Fibrillation-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction study 48 (ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48). , 2010, American heart journal.

[22]  Gregory Y H Lip,et al.  Refining clinical risk stratification for predicting stroke and thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation using a novel risk factor-based approach: the euro heart survey on atrial fibrillation. , 2010, Chest.

[23]  M. Pencina,et al.  Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: From area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond , 2008, Statistics in medicine.

[24]  D. Morrow,et al.  Earlier detection of myocardial injury in a preliminary evaluation using a new troponin I assay with improved sensitivity. , 2007, American journal of clinical pathology.

[25]  Yuchiao Chang,et al.  Effect of intensity of oral anticoagulation on stroke severity and mortality in atrial fibrillation. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  Martha J. Radford,et al.  Validation of Clinical Classification Schemes for Predicting Stroke: Results From the National Registry of Atrial Fibrillation , 2001 .

[27]  E. DeLong,et al.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. , 1988, Biometrics.

[28]  S. Nattel,et al.  Translating Basic Mechanistic Insights to the Patient , 2014 .