Decarbonizing residential building energy: A cost-effective approach

Abstract Given the problem of climate change, the world economy must eventually switch to carbon neutral energy. In this study we present a cost-effectiveness approach: given a goal of decarbonization, the objective is to accomplish this at minimum cost. For residential building energy, we show that total cost is minimized by equating marginal cost of building energy conserved with marginal cost of obtaining carbon-free energy, where we express costs of both in dollars per kWh. We describe how the cost of solar photovoltaic energy provides an upper bound on the marginal cost of carbon-free energy and thus an upper bound on marginal cost of conserved energy—one should not necessarily spend more on energy conservation than the cost of photovoltaic energy (though there are several caveats). A case study from Vermont, USA illustrates these principles and implementation issues with marginal analysis of energy conservation. From a policy perspective, the principles presented suggest that either carbon taxes or carbon limits could be used to decarbonize building energy at minimum cost, but that approaches using renewable-energy subsidies or prescriptive building codes result in greater decarbonization costs to society. This suggests that new policy approaches be adopted.

[1]  O. Canziani,et al.  Climate change 2007: synthesis report. Summary for policymakers , 2007 .

[2]  T. Buchholz,et al.  Forest biomass energy: assessing atmospheric carbon impacts by discounting future carbon flows , 2016 .

[3]  M. Jakob Marginal costs and co-benefits of energy efficiency investments: The case of the Swiss residential sector , 2006 .

[4]  F. D. Heidt,et al.  Evaluation of the cost efficiency of an energy efficient building , 2004 .

[5]  Ray Galvin,et al.  Thermal upgrades of existing homes in Germany: The building code, subsidies, and economic efficiency , 2010 .

[6]  Maryam Mirhadi Fard,et al.  Differentiating among low-energy, low-carbon and net-zero-energy building strategies for policy formulation , 2012 .

[7]  E. Hertwich,et al.  CO2 emissions from biomass combustion for bioenergy: atmospheric decay and contribution to global warming , 2011 .

[8]  A. Audenaert,et al.  Economic analysis of passive houses and low-energy houses compared with standard houses , 2008 .

[9]  J. Mason,et al.  The technical, geographical, and economic feasibility for solar energy to supply the energy needs of the US , 2009 .

[10]  Svend Svendsen,et al.  Method for component-based economical optimisation for use in design of new low-energy buildings , 2012 .

[11]  E. Ostrom Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change , 2010 .

[12]  D. Jorgenson,et al.  Reducing US carbon emissions: an econometric general equilibrium assessment , 1993 .

[13]  Dina Franceschi,et al.  Beyond Kyoto: A tax-based system for the global reduction of greenhouse gas emissions , 2006 .

[14]  Frank Ackerman,et al.  Can We Afford the Future?: The Economics of a Warming World , 2008 .

[15]  P. Ekins,et al.  Marginal abatement cost curves: a call for caution , 2011 .

[16]  South Africa,et al.  Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability – IPCC WGII AR5 summary for policymakers , 2014 .

[17]  L. D. Danny Harvey,et al.  Recent Advances in Sustainable Buildings: Review of the Energy and Cost Performance of the State-of-the-Art Best Practices from Around the World , 2013 .

[18]  M. Weitzman,et al.  On Modeling and Interpreting the Economics of Catastrophic Climate Change , 2009, The Review of Economics and Statistics.

[19]  P. Denholm,et al.  Land-use requirements and the per-capita solar footprint for photovoltaic generation in the United States , 2008 .

[20]  D. J. Ward The failure of marginal abatement cost curves in optimising a transition to a low carbon energy supply , 2014 .

[21]  Andreas H. Hermelink,et al.  CEPHEUS results : measurements and occupants' satisfaction provide evidence for Passive Houses being an option for sustainable building , 2006 .

[22]  Sanna Syri,et al.  Electrical energy storage systems: A comparative life cycle cost analysis , 2015 .

[23]  A. Baranzini,et al.  A future for carbon taxes , 2000 .

[24]  Hans-Martin Henning,et al.  A comprehensive model for the German electricity and heat sector in a future energy system with a dominant contribution from renewable energy technologies—Part I: Methodology , 2014 .

[25]  E. Baker,et al.  The Economics of Solar Electricity , 2013 .

[26]  Mark Z. Jacobson,et al.  Providing all global energy with wind, water, and solar power, Part I: Technologies, energy resources, quantities and areas of infrastructure, and materials , 2011 .

[27]  J. Boyce From Natural Resources to Natural Assets , 2001, New solutions : a journal of environmental and occupational health policy : NS.

[28]  Kenneth C. Johnson,et al.  A Decarbonization Strategy for the Electricity Sector: New-Source Subsidies , 2010 .

[29]  E. Dunlop,et al.  The results of performance measurements of field‐aged crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules , 2009 .

[30]  Danny S. Parker,et al.  Very low energy homes in the United States: Perspectives on performance from measured data , 2009 .

[31]  Galen Barbose,et al.  Tracking the Sun VII: An Historical Summary of the Installed Price of Photovoltaics in the United States from 1998 to 2013 , 2012 .

[32]  Laurent Georges,et al.  Environmental and economic performance of heating systems for energy-efficient dwellings: Case of passive and low-energy single-family houses , 2012 .

[33]  Tim Jackson,et al.  Least-cost greenhouse planning : supply curves for global warming abatement , 1991 .

[34]  V. Fthenakis,et al.  Coupling PV and CAES power plants to transform intermittent PV electricity into a dispatchable electricity source , 2008 .