A new interdisciplinary treatment strategy versus usual medical care for the treatment of subacromial impingement syndrome: a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundSubacromial impingement syndrome (SIS) is the most frequently recorded shoulder disorder. When conservative treatment of SIS fails, a subacromial decompression is warranted. However, the best moment of referral for surgery is not well defined. Both early and late referrals have disadvantages – unnecessary operations and smaller improvements in shoulder function, respectively. This paper describes the design of a new interdisciplinary treatment strategy for SIS (TRANSIT), which comprises rules to treat SIS in primary care and a well-defined moment of referral for surgery.Methods/DesignThe effectiveness of an arthroscopic subacromial decompression versus usual medical care will be evaluated in a randomized controlled trial (RCT). Patients are eligible for inclusion when experiencing a recurrence of SIS within one year after a first episode of SIS which was successfully treated with a subacromial corticosteroid injection. After inclusion they will receive injection treatment again by their general practitioner. When, after this treatment, there is a second recurrence within a year post-injection, the participants will be randomized to either an arthroscopic subacromial decompression (intervention group) or continuation of usual medical care (control group). The latter will be performed by a general practitioner according to the Dutch National Guidelines for Shoulder Problems. At inclusion, at randomization and three, six and 12 months post-randomization an outcome assessment will take place. The primary outcome measure is the patient-reported Shoulder Disability Questionnaire. The secondary outcome measures include both disease-specific and generic measures, and an economic evaluation. Treatment effects will be compared for all measurement points by using a GLM repeated measures analyses.DiscussionThe rationale and design of an RCT comparing arthroscopic subacromial decompression with usual medical care for subacromial impingement syndrome are presented. The results of this study will improve insight into the best moment of referral for surgery for SIS.

[1]  R. Glousman,et al.  Accuracy of subacromial injection: anterolateral versus posterior approach. , 2005, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[2]  R. Abdalla,et al.  Interventions for tears of the rotator cuff in adults. , 2004, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[3]  A. Carr,et al.  A self-administered questionnaire for assessment of symptoms and function of the shoulder. , 1998, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[4]  A. Acornley,et al.  Recovery after arthroscopic subacromial decompression: prognostic value of the subacromial injection test. , 2005, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[5]  L. Bouter,et al.  Systematic review of prognostic cohort studies on shoulder disorders , 2004, Pain.

[6]  P. Westerhuis.  Manipulative Therapy in Addition to Usual Medical Care for Patients with Shoulder Dysfunction and Pain - A Randomized, Controlled Trial , 2005 .

[7]  J. Kuhn,et al.  Shoulder impingement syndrome. , 2005, The American journal of medicine.

[8]  Cs Neer,et al.  2nd. Impingement lesions. , 1983 .

[9]  Michael J. Campbell,et al.  Statistics at Square One , 1976, British medical journal.

[10]  C. Sherbourne,et al.  The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) , 1992 .

[11]  L M Bouter,et al.  Shoulder disorders in general practice: incidence, patient characteristics, and management. , 1995, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[12]  A. Ljunggren,et al.  Arthroscopic surgery versus supervised exercises in patients with rotator cuff disease (stage II impingement syndrome): a prospective, randomized, controlled study in 125 patients with a 2 1/2-year follow-up. , 1999, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[13]  T. Wallny,et al.  [MRI after reconstruction of the supraspinatus tendon: MR-tomographic findings]. , 2004, Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und ihre Grenzgebiete.

[14]  F. Wuyts,et al.  Arthroscopic subacromial decompression for advanced (stage II) impingement syndrome: a study of 52 patients with five years follow-up. , 2003, Acta orthopaedica Belgica.

[15]  J. O. Søjbjerg,et al.  [Arthroscopic subacromial decompression]. , 1997, Ugeskrift for laeger.

[16]  R. Nelissen,et al.  The accuracy of subacromial injections: a prospective randomized magnetic resonance imaging study. , 2006, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[17]  C. Constant,et al.  A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. , 1987, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[18]  B. Arroll,et al.  Corticosteroid injections for painful shoulder: a meta-analysis. , 2005, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[19]  Kotaro Yamakado,et al.  The targeting accuracy of subacromial injection to the shoulder: an arthrographic evaluation. , 2002, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[20]  Jonathan P. Braman,et al.  Arthroscopic decompression and physiotherapy have similar effectiveness for subacromial impingement. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[21]  H. M. Schüller,et al.  Translation, adaptation and validation of the Shoulder Rating Questionnaire (SRQ) into the Dutch language , 2005, Clinical rehabilitation.

[22]  N. Aaronson,et al.  Translation, validation, and norming of the Dutch language version of the SF-36 Health Survey in community and chronic disease populations. , 1998, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[23]  R. Dodenhoff,et al.  Proximal Thigh Pain after Femoral Nailing: Causes and Treatment , 1997 .

[24]  D. S. Morrison,et al.  Non-Operative Treatment of Subacromial Impingement Syndrome* , 1997, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[25]  J. Arendzen,et al.  A shoulder pain score: a comprehensive questionnaire for assessing pain in patients with shoulder complaints. , 1996, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[26]  Diercks Rl,et al.  [Results of anterior shoulder decompression surgery according to Neer for shoulder impingement syndrome; little effect on fitness for work]. , 1998 .

[27]  R. Emery,et al.  A standard method of shoulder strength measurement for the Constant score with a spring balance. , 1998, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[28]  H Ellman,et al.  Arthroscopic subacromial decompression: analysis of one- to three-year results. , 1987, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[29]  L. Adolfsson,et al.  Intraobserver and interobserver reliability for the strength test in the Constant-Murley shoulder assessment. , 2005, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[30]  R. Hawkins,et al.  Acromioplasty for impingement with an intact rotator cuff. , 1988, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[31]  B. Forster,et al.  Shoulder after rotator cuff repair: MR imaging findings in asymptomatic individuals--initial experience. , 1999, Radiology.

[32]  R. Buchbinder,et al.  Interventions for shoulder pain. , 2006, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[33]  E. Naredo,et al.  A randomized comparative study of short term response to blind injection versus sonographic-guided injection of local corticosteroids in patients with painful shoulder. , 2004, The Journal of rheumatology.

[34]  O. Schmitt,et al.  MRT nach Rekonstruktion der Supraspinatussehne: MR-tomographische Befunde , 2004 .

[35]  L M Bouter,et al.  Shoulder disability questionnaire design and responsiveness of a functional status measure. , 2000, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[36]  C. Terwee,et al.  Incidence and prevalence of complaints of the neck and upper extremity in general practice , 2004, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[37]  T. Wickiewicz,et al.  Arthroscopic acromioplasty. Technique and results. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[38]  K. Groenier,et al.  Treatment of shoulder complaints in general practice: long term results of a randomised, single blind study comparing physiotherapy, manipulation, and corticosteroid injection , 1999, BMJ.

[39]  P. Calvert,et al.  Arthroscopic subacromial decompression: results and factors affecting outcome. , 1999, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[40]  T. Hamada,et al.  Pathologic Evidence of Degeneration as a Primary Cause of Rotator Cuff Tear , 2003, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[41]  Wing K Chang,et al.  Shoulder impingement syndrome. , 2004, Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America.

[42]  Ware J.E.Jr.,et al.  THE MOS 36- ITEM SHORT FORM HEALTH SURVEY (SF- 36) CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK AND ITEM SELECTION , 1992 .

[43]  W. Brannath,et al.  Modification of the Constant-Murley shoulder score-introduction of the individual relative Constant score Individual shoulder assessment. , 2005, Injury.