Makerspaces and Contributions to Entrepreneurship

Abstract Entrepreneurship is essential to the growth and dynamism of countries and regions, forcing policy makers to search for levers to generate new firms within their municipalities. Without public attention, the maker movement, which refers to the democratization of access to and information on using tools, has risen from a fringe hobby to a prominent lifestyle with important implications for public concern. Modernly, tools have been available only to those working within firms and industry or those willing to pay large costs for their procurement. The maker movement presents multiple avenues to increase access to these tools, with the potential for impacts on the quantity and nature of entrepreneurship. My paper explores makerspaces and how they theoretically contribute to business generation and sustainment. As defined in the paper, the maker movement will influence entrepreneurship through three principle channels. The maker movement attracts more individuals into product design, and thus may launch more “accidental entrepreneurs” if they find that their user solutions have a market. Secondly, the maker movement generates dense but diverse networks, creating new ideas and innovative thinking. Lastly, the maker movement lowers the costs for prototyping, making early sales and acquiring outside funding more realistic.

[1]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[2]  Annouk Lievens,et al.  Virtual lead user communities: Drivers of knowledge creation for innovation , 2012 .

[3]  James W. Carland,et al.  Differentiating Entrepreneurs from Small Business Owners: A Conceptualization , 1984 .

[4]  Steven Levy,et al.  Hackers: Heroes of the Computer Revolution , 1984 .

[5]  Cornelius Herstatt,et al.  User-innovators and "local" information: The case of mountain biking , 2005 .

[6]  D. Blair,et al.  The Child in the Garden: An Evaluative Review of the Benefits of School Gardening , 2009 .

[7]  Jarkko Moilanen Emerging Hackerspaces - Peer-Production Generation , 2012, OSS.

[8]  E. Hippel,et al.  Lead users: a source of novel product concepts , 1986 .

[9]  E. Hippel,et al.  FROM EXPERIENCE: Developing New Product Concepts Via the Lead User Method: A Case Study in a “Low-Tech” Field , 1992 .

[10]  Wenpin Tsai Knowledge Transfer in Intraorganizational Networks: Effects of Network Position and Absorptive Capacity on Business Unit Innovation and Performance , 2001 .

[11]  Sonali K. Shah,et al.  The Accidental Entrepreneur: The Emergent and Collective Process of User Entrepreneurship , 2007 .

[12]  Thalia MacMillan,et al.  The Benefits of Gardening for Older Adults: A Systematic Review of the Literature , 2013 .

[13]  Sonali K. Shah,et al.  How Communities Support Innovative Activities: An Exploration of Assistance and Sharing Among End-Users , 2003 .

[14]  Eric Joseph,et al.  What are Makerspaces, Hackerspaces, and Fab Labs? , 2014 .

[15]  A. Cooper The role of incubator organizations in the founding of growth-oriented firms , 1985 .

[16]  T. M. Amabile The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. , 1983 .

[17]  Amy L. Kenworthy,et al.  The Accidental Entrepreneur: Campbellian Antinomies and Organizational Foundings , 1999 .

[18]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[19]  Mats Magnusson,et al.  Where do good innovation ideas come from , 2008 .