The Effectiveness of Personalized E-mail Newsletters and the Role of Personal Characteristics

Personalizing communication means creating persuasive messages that refer to aspects of a person's self. Although the use of personalization is increasing, research on its effectiveness is limited and the results are mixed. This study examined the persuasiveness of personalized e-mail newsletters in terms of increased attention, cognitive activity, evaluation, attitude, intention, and behavior by means of an experiment (n=109). Participants randomly received either a personalized or a generic newsletter advertising a sports center. Personalization triggered a more positive evaluation of the message; however, it did not influence the other effect variables. The effects were moderated by consumers' need for uniqueness, trust, and privacy concerns, suggesting that personalization is a good strategy to increase message evaluation only among individuals who have a high need for uniqueness.

[1]  F. Bull,et al.  Understanding how people process health information: a comparison of tailored and nontailored weight-loss materials. , 1999, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[2]  J. Phelps,et al.  Direct marketing and the use of individual-level consumer information: Determining how and when “privacy” matters , 1997 .

[3]  Rafael Accorsi,et al.  Personalization in privacy-aware highly dynamic systems , 2006, CACM.

[4]  Steven E. Kaplan,et al.  A Web assurance services model of trust for B2C e-commerce , 2003, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[5]  C. F. Kao,et al.  Central and peripheral routes to persuasion: An individual difference perspective. , 1986 .

[6]  G. Loosveldt,et al.  The effect of personalization on response rates and data quality in web surveys , 2005 .

[7]  Barbara L. Gross,et al.  What consumers know and what they do: An investigation of consumer knowledge, awareness, and use of privacy protection strategies , 2003 .

[8]  Michael S. Wogalter,et al.  Personalization of warning signs: The role of perceived relevance on behavioral compliance , 1994 .

[9]  E. C. Cherry.  Some Experiments on the Recognition of Speech, with One and with Two Ears , 1953 .

[10]  F. Bull,et al.  Understanding the Effects of Printed Health Education Materials: Which Features Lead to Which Outcomes? , 2001, Journal of health communication.

[11]  C. R. Snyder,et al.  Product Scarcity by Need for Uniqueness Interaction: A Consumer Catch-22 Carousel? , 1992 .

[12]  Kelly Tepper Tian,et al.  Consumers' Need for Uniqueness: Scale Development and Validation , 2001 .

[13]  Hwa-Chun Ma,et al.  Learning the Determinants of Satisfaction and Usage Intention of Instant Messaging , 2008, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[14]  Marios Koufaris,et al.  The development of initial trust in an online company by new customers , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[15]  Matthew W Kreuter,et al.  Tailored and targeted health communication: strategies for enhancing information relevance. , 2003, American journal of health behavior.

[16]  M. Jarymowicz,et al.  Asymmetry in the estimation of interpersonal distance and identity affirmation , 1989 .

[17]  Itamar Simonson,et al.  The Role of Explanations and Need for Uniqueness in Consumer Decision Making: Unconventional Choices Based on Reasons , 2000 .

[18]  S. Shyam Sundar,et al.  The Psychological Appeal of Personalized Content in Web Portals: Does Customization Affect Attitudes and Behavior? , 2006 .

[19]  R. Petty,et al.  Psychological Processes Underlying Persuasion , 2008 .

[20]  Roderick Hunt,et al.  The Enigma of Organization and Distinctiveness , 1993 .

[21]  Aviv Shoham,et al.  Consumers' need for uniqueness: short‐form scale development and cross‐cultural validation , 2008 .

[22]  Stephen R. Porter,et al.  The Impact of Contact Type on Web Survey Response Rates , 2003 .

[23]  F. Bull,et al.  Effects of tailored, personalized and general health messages on physical activity. , 1999, Patient education and counseling.

[24]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  GPOWER: A general power analysis program , 1996 .

[25]  S. Shavitt,et al.  Getting too personal: Reactance to highly personalized email solicitations , 2008 .

[26]  Brenda J. Cude,et al.  ‘Hello, Mrs. Sarah Jones! We recommend this product!’ Consumers' perceptions about personalized advertising: comparisons across advertisements delivered via three different types of media , 2009 .

[27]  Dennis A. Pitta,et al.  Privacy and one‐to‐one marketing: resolving the conflict , 2003 .

[28]  T. Brandon,et al.  Tailored interventions for motivating smoking cessation: using placebo tailoring to examine the influence of expectancies and personalization. , 2005, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[29]  Arie Dijkstra,et al.  Working mechanisms of computer-tailored health education: evidence from smoking cessation. , 2005, Health education research.

[30]  Naoki Abe,et al.  Unintrusive Customization Techniques for Web Advertising , 1999, Comput. Networks.

[31]  A. Ball,et al.  Is personalization of services always a good thing? Exploring the role of technology‐mediated personalization (TMP) in service relationships , 2009 .

[32]  R. Winer.  A Framework for Customer Relationship Management , 2001 .

[33]  M. Fishbein,et al.  Understanding tailoring in communicating about health. , 2008, Health education research.

[34]  Kai Riemer,et al.  The Many Faces of Personalization , 2003 .