Machinability assessment of inconel 718 by factorial design of experiment coupled with response surface methodology
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] M. A. El Baradie. Computer aided analysis of a surface roughness model for turning , 1991 .
[2] E. Trent,et al. Temperature distribution in tools used for cutting iron, titanium and nickel , 1975 .
[3] G. Box,et al. On the Experimental Attainment of Optimum Conditions , 1951 .
[4] I. Choudhury,et al. Machinability of nickel-base super alloys: a general review , 1998 .
[5] William J. Hill,et al. A Review of Response Surface Methodology: A Literature Survey* , 1966 .
[6] Anil Mital,et al. Surface finish prediction models for fine turning , 1988 .
[7] M A El Baradie,et al. Surface Roughness Model for Turning Grey Cast Iron (154 BHN) , 1993 .
[8] K. K. Padmanabhan,et al. Evaluation of frictional damping by response surface methodology , 1991 .
[9] G. Box,et al. The Exploration and Exploitation of Response Surfaces: An Example of the Link between the Fitted Surface and the Basic Mechanism of the System , 1955 .
[10] R Mead,et al. A review of response surface methodology from a biometric viewpoint. , 1975, Biometrics.
[11] K. Taraman,et al. Multi machining output—multi independent variable turning research by response surface methodology , 1974 .
[12] N. Draper,et al. Applied Regression Analysis , 1966 .
[13] M. C. Shaw. Metal Cutting Principles , 1960 .