Grading systems, features of assessment and students’ approaches to learning

The Bologna process aims at harmonising the higher education systems in the Europe. One of the most important tools proposed for such a purpose is the European Credit Transfer System. A significant element of this system is a common seven-step grading scale. It has previously been shown that assessment characteristics impact on students’ approaches to learning. Furthermore, there is also empirical evidence that judgement criteria have an effect on students’ learning. The focus of this article is on the relationships between grading systems, assessment characteristics and students’ learning. Empirical evidence from a Swedish survey study indicates that multi-step grading scales may have detrimental repercussions on the nature of the assessment tasks and thereby indirectly on the students’ approaches to learning. We suggest that the effects of grading systems need to be considered in the current discussion in order to support quality in learning.

[1]  L. Dahlgren,et al.  Inlärning och Omvärldsuppfattning : en bok om den studerande människan , 1999 .

[2]  Chris Rust,et al.  Improving Students' Learning by Developing their Understanding of Assessment Criteria and Processes , 2003 .

[3]  C. Miller,et al.  Up to the Mark: A Study of the Examination Game. , 1974 .

[4]  H. Salzman,et al.  Making the grade , 2008, Nature.

[5]  D. Royce Sadler,et al.  Interpretations of criteria‐based assessment and grading in higher education , 2005 .

[6]  Chris Rust,et al.  Know what I mean? Enhancing student understanding of assessment standards and criteria , 2004 .

[7]  Qualitatively different ways of differentiating student achievement: a phenomenographic study of academics’ conceptions of grade descriptors , 2004 .

[8]  Towe Wiiand Examinationen i fokus : högskolestudenters lärande och examination : en litteraturöversikt , 1998 .

[9]  M. A. Dahlgren,et al.  Learning to play the seminar game: students’ initial encounters with a basic working form in higher education1 , 2005 .

[10]  J. Aultman The Hidden Curriculum , 2007 .

[11]  Hugh Willmott,et al.  Commercialising Higher Education in the UK: The state, industry and peer review , 2003 .

[12]  K. Sullivan Credit and Grade Transfer within the European Union's SOCRATES Programme: Unity in diversity or head in the sand? , 2002 .

[13]  D. Anderson,et al.  The hidden curriculum. , 1992, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  Harvey Woolf,et al.  Assessment criteria: reflections on current practices , 2004 .

[15]  Janette Currie,et al.  Sacrifices in Greedy Universities: Are they gendered? , 2000 .

[16]  Rob Cowdroy,et al.  Assessing highly‐creative ability1 , 2005 .

[17]  Terence Karran,et al.  Achieving Bologna convergence: is ECTS failing to make the grade? , 2004 .

[18]  K. Fisher Demystifying Critical Reflection: Defining criteria for assessment , 2003 .