The “Mendel syndrome” in science: durability of scientific literature and its effects on bibliometric analysis of individual scientists

[1]  Katherine W. McCain,et al.  Eponymy and Obliteration by Incorporation: The case of the "Nash Equilibrium" , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[2]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  A bibliometric classificatory approach for the study and assessment of research performance at the individual level: The effects of age on productivity and impact , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[3]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  Is scientific literature subject to a 'Sell-By-Date'? A general methodology to analyze the 'durability' of scientific documents , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[4]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  Citation speed as a measure to predict the attention an article receives: An investigation of the validity of editorial decisions at Angewandte Chemie International Edition , 2010, J. Informetrics.

[5]  Óscar Rodríguez-Ruiz,et al.  The citation indexes and the quantification of knowledge , 2009 .

[6]  R. Costas,et al.  Scaling rules in the science system: Influence of field-specific citation characteristics on the impact of individual researchers , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[7]  Ulf Sandström,et al.  Meeting the Micro-Level Challenges : Bibliometrics at the Individual Level , 2009 .

[8]  Linda Butler,et al.  Using a balanced approach to bibliometrics: quantitative performance measures in the Australian Research Quality Framework , 2008 .

[9]  W. Glänzel.  Seven Myths in Bibliometrics About facts and fiction in quantitative science studies , 2008 .

[10]  Alfredo Yegros-Yegros,et al.  Median age difference of references as indicator of information update of research groups: A case study in Spanish food research , 2009, Scientometrics.

[11]  Juan Miguel Campanario,et al.  Rejecting highly cited papers: The views of scientists who encounter resistance to their discoveries from other scientists , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[12]  Eugene Garfield,et al.  Can Nobel Prize Winners Be Predicted? , 2006 .

[13]  Rodrigo Costas,et al.  Bibliometric indicators at the micro-level: some results in the area of natural resources at the Spanish CSIC , 2005 .

[14]  Peter Weingart,et al.  Impact of bibliometrics upon the science system: Inadvertent consequences? , 2005, Scientometrics.

[15]  Hendrik P. van Dalen,et al.  Wage Structure and the Incentive Effect of Promotions , 2004 .

[16]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: Database description, overview of indicators and first applications , 1995, Scientometrics.

[17]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Bibliometric measurement of research performance and Price's theory of differences among the sciences , 1989, Scientometrics.

[18]  Anthony F. J. van Raan,et al.  Peer review and bibliometric indicators of scientific performance: A comparison of cum laude doctorates with ordinary doctorates in physics , 1987, Scientometrics.

[19]  Elizabeth Smith Aversa,et al.  Citation patterns of highly cited papers and their relationship to literature aging: A study of the working literature , 1985, Scientometrics.

[20]  Harriet Zuckerman,et al.  Indicators of science: Notes and queries , 1980, Scientometrics.

[21]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  A stochastic model for the ageing of scientific literature , 2005, Scientometrics.

[22]  Aline Solari,et al.  The SCI Journal Citation Reports: A potential tool for studying journals? , 2005, Scientometrics.

[23]  Katarina Prpic,et al.  Characteristics and determinants of eminent scientists' productivity , 2005, Scientometrics.

[24]  Eugene Garfield,et al.  Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool? , 2005, Scientometrics.

[25]  ANTHONY F. J. VAN RAAN,et al.  Sleeping Beauties in science , 2004, Scientometrics.

[26]  Jack Meadows,et al.  The immediacy effect - then and now , 2004, J. Documentation.

[27]  Kène Henkens,et al.  Demographers and Their Journals: Who Remains Uncited After Ten Years? , 2004 .

[28]  E. Garfield,et al.  The myth of delayed recognition , 2004 .

[29]  D. Aksnes,et al.  Peer reviews and bibliometric indicators: a comparative study at a Norwegian university , 2004 .

[30]  Thijs Pollman,et al.  Forgetting and the Ageing of Scientific Publications , 2004, Scientometrics.

[31]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Better late than never? On the chance to become highly cited only beyond the standard bibliometric time horizon , 2004, Scientometrics.

[32]  D. Aksnes.  CHARACTERISTICS OF HIGHLY CITED PAPERS , 2003 .

[33]  J. Campanario.  The parallelism between scientists' and students' resistance to new scientific ideas , 2002 .

[34]  P. Dayton,et al.  ON THE EVOLUTION OF ECOLOGICAL IDEAS: PARADIGMS AND SCIENTIFIC PROGRESS , 2002 .

[35]  Randy Moore.  The "Rediscovery" of Mendel's Work. , 2001 .

[36]  Bard R. Ferrall.  Evaluating Criminology and Criminal Justice , 1999 .

[37]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  A new classification system to describe the ageing of scientific journals and their impact factors , 1998, J. Documentation.

[38]  John T. Rigsby,et al.  Information Processing Using Citations to Investigate Journal Influence in Accounting , 1998, Inf. Process. Manag..

[39]  Gunther S. Stent,et al.  Delayed Recognition in Scientific Discovery: Citation Frequency Analysis Aids the Search for Case Histories , 1998 .

[40]  C. Beed,et al.  Measuring the Quality of Academic Journals: The Case of Economics , 1996 .

[41]  María Bordons,et al.  Research performance at the micro level: analysis of structure and dynamics of pharmacological research teams , 1995 .

[42]  N. Foss.  The economic thought of an Austrian Marshallian George Barclay Richardson , 1995 .

[43]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  A bibliometric study on ageing and reception processes of scientific literature , 1995, J. Inf. Sci..

[44]  Maurice B. Line,et al.  Changes in the Use of Literature with Time--Obsolescence Revisited , 1993, Libr. Trends.

[45]  Peter J. Rousseeuw,et al.  Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis , 1990 .

[46]  E. Garfield,et al.  More Delayed Recognition. Part 2. From Inhibin to Scanning Electron Microscopy , 1990 .

[47]  Elliot Noma,et al.  Are there enduring patents? , 1985, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[48]  M. H. MacRoberts.  Was Mendel's paper on Pisum neglected or unknown? , 1985 .

[49]  B. Glass.  The long neglect of genetic discoveries and the criterion of prematurity , 1974, Journal of the history of biology.

[50]  G. Stent.  Prematurity and uniqueness in scientific discovery. , 1972, Scientific American.

[51]  Stephen Cole,et al.  Professional Standing and the Reception of Scientific Discoveries , 1970, American Journal of Sociology.

[52]  J. MacQueen.  Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations , 1967 .

[53]  D J PRICE,et al.  NETWORKS OF SCIENTIFIC PAPERS. , 1965, Science.

[54]  Bernard Barber,et al.  Resistance by scientists to scientific discovery. , 1961, Science.

[55]  R. E. Burton,et al.  The “half‐life” of some scientific and technical literatures , 1960 .