Lungs contribute to solving the frog’s cocktail party problem by enhancing the spectral contrast of conspecific vocal signals

Noise impairs signal perception and is a major source of selection on animal communication. Identifying adaptations that enable receivers to cope with noise is critical to discovering how animal sensory and communication systems evolve. We integrated biophysical and bioacoustic measurements with physiological modeling to demonstrate that the lungs of frogs serve a heretofore unknown noise-control function in vocal communication. Lung resonance enhances the signal-to-noise ratio for communication by selectively reducing the tympanum’s sensitivity at critical frequencies where the tuning of two inner ear organs overlaps. Social network analysis of citizen-science data on frog calling behavior indicates the calls of other frog species in multi-species choruses are a prominent source of environmental noise attenuated by the lungs. These data reveal that an ancient adaptation for detecting sound via the lungs has been evolutionarily co-opted to create spectral contrast enhancement that contributes to solving a multi-species cocktail party problem.

[1]  M. Lenzen,et al.  Scientists’ warning on affluence , 2020, Nature Communications.

[2]  Clinton D. Francis,et al.  Why conservation biology can benefit from sensory ecology , 2020, Nature Ecology & Evolution.

[3]  J. Wiens,et al.  The origins of acoustic communication in vertebrates , 2020, Nature Communications.

[4]  Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard,et al.  Lung-to-ear sound transmission does not improve directional hearing in green treefrogs (Hyla cinerea) , 2020, bioRxiv.

[5]  Mark A Bee,et al.  Within‐individual variation in sexual displays: signal or noise? , 2018, Behavioral Ecology.

[6]  M. A. Bee,et al.  Nonlinear processing of a multicomponent communication signal by combination-sensitive neurons in the anuran inferior colliculus , 2017, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[7]  Mark A. Bee,et al.  Frogs Exploit Statistical Regularities in Noisy Acoustic Scenes to Solve Cocktail-Party-like Problems , 2017, Current Biology.

[8]  Peter M. Narins ICE on the road to auditory sensitivity reduction and sound localization in the frog , 2016, Biological Cybernetics.

[9]  Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard,et al.  Sound source localization and segregation with internally coupled ears: the treefrog model , 2016, Biological Cybernetics.

[10]  A. Büchner,et al.  Spectral contrast enhancement improves speech intelligibility in noise for cochlear implants. , 2016, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  G. Klump Perceptual and Neural Mechanisms of Auditory Scene Analysis in the European Starling , 2016 .

[12]  Juliane Junker Acoustic Communication In Insects And Anurans Common Problems And Diverse Solutions , 2016 .

[13]  Cory T. Miller,et al.  Psychological Mechanisms in Animal Communication , 2016, Animal Signals and Communication.

[14]  R. Haven Wiley,et al.  Noise Matters: The Evolution of Communication , 2015 .

[15]  Mark A Bee,et al.  Treefrogs as animal models for research on auditory scene analysis and the cocktail party problem. , 2015, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[16]  Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard,et al.  Hearing of the African lungfish (Protopterus annectens) suggests underwater pressure detection and rudimentary aerial hearing in early tetrapods , 2015, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[17]  Mark A Bee,et al.  Assessing stimulus and subject influences on auditory evoked potentials and their relation to peripheral physiology in green treefrogs (Hyla cinerea). , 2014, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part A, Molecular & integrative physiology.

[18]  Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard,et al.  Spatial hearing in Cope’s gray treefrog: II. Frequency-dependent directionality in the amplitude and phase of tympanum vibrations , 2014, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[19]  Heiner Römer,et al.  Masking by Noise in Acoustic Insects: Problems and Solutions , 2013 .

[20]  Henrik Brumm,et al.  Animal Communication and Noise , 2013, Animal Signals and Communication.

[21]  Richard R. Fay,et al.  Rethinking sound detection by fishes , 2011, Hearing Research.

[22]  Peter M. Narins,et al.  Hearing and Sound Communication in Amphibians , 2010 .

[23]  Josh H. McDermott The cocktail party problem , 2009, Current Biology.

[24]  Gao Yu,et al.  Design of integrated system for heterogeneous network query terminal: Design of integrated system for heterogeneous network query terminal , 2009 .

[25]  M. A. Bee,et al.  The cocktail party problem: what is it? How can it be solved? And why should animal behaviorists study it? , 2008, Journal of comparative psychology.

[26]  Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard,et al.  Acoustical Coupling of Lizard Eardrums , 2008, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[27]  Gábor Csárdi,et al.  The igraph software package for complex network research , 2006 .

[28]  H. Carl Gerhardt,et al.  Acoustic spectral preferences in two cryptic species of grey treefrogs: implications for mate choice and sensory mechanisms , 2005, Animal Behaviour.

[29]  M. Lannoo Amphibian Declines: The Conservation Status of United States Species , 2005 .

[30]  H. Gerhardt,et al.  Mid-frequency suppression in the green treefrog (Hyla cinerea): mechanisms and implications for the evolution of acoustic communication , 2005, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[31]  Linda A. Weir,et al.  North American Amphibian Monitoring Program (NAAMP) , 2005 .

[32]  G. Manley,et al.  Evolution of the Vertebrate Auditory System , 2004, Springer Handbook of Auditory Research.

[33]  P. Narins,et al.  AM representation in green treefrog auditory nerve fibers: neuroethological implications for pattern recognition and sound localization , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[34]  Morten Buhl Jørgensen,et al.  Comparative studies of the biophysics of directional hearing in anurans , 1991, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[35]  H. Carl Gerhardt,et al.  Directional hearing in the gray tree frog Hyla versicolor: Eardrum vibrations and phonotaxis , 1991, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[36]  Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard,et al.  Biophysics of directional hearing in the frog Eleutherodactylus coqui , 1991, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[37]  H. Carl Gerhardt,et al.  Mating call recognition in the green treefrog (Hyla cinerea): Importance of two frequency bands as a function of sound pressure level , 1981, Journal of comparative physiology.

[38]  Robert R. Capranica,et al.  Masking patterns and filter characteristics of auditory nerve fibers in the green treefrog (Hyla cinerea) , 1980, Journal of comparative physiology.

[39]  Robert R. Capranica,et al.  Accuracy of phonotaxis by the green treefrog (Hyla cinerea) , 1979, Journal of comparative physiology.

[40]  H. Carl Gerhardt,et al.  Sound pressure levels and radiation patterns of the vocalizations of some North American frogs and toads , 1975, Journal of comparative physiology.

[41]  J. Clack,et al.  The Evolution of Single- and Multiple-Ossicle Ears in Fishes and Tetrapods , 2004 .

[42]  G. Höbel,et al.  REPRODUCTIVE CHARACTER DISPLACEMENT IN THE ACOUSTIC COMMUNICATION SYSTEM OF GREEN TREE FROGS (HYLA CINEREA) , 2003, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[43]  Franz Huber,et al.  Acoustic Communication in Insects and Anurans: Common Problems and Diverse Solutions , 2002 .

[44]  Mark A. Bee,et al.  Neighbour–stranger discrimination by territorial male bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana): I. Acoustic basis , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[45]  M. A. Bee,et al.  Individual variation in advertisement calls of territorial male green frogs, Rana clamitans : implications for individual discrimination , 2001 .

[46]  T. Kamada,et al.  The lung-eardrum pathway in three treefrog and four dendrobatid frog species: some properties of sound transmission. , 1994, The Journal of experimental biology.

[47]  B C Moore,et al.  Spectral contrast enhancement of speech in noise for listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment: effects on intelligibility, quality, and response times. , 1993, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[48]  A M Simpson,et al.  Spectral enhancement to improve the intelligibility of speech in noise for hearing-impaired listeners. , 1990, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[49]  J. Tautz,et al.  Accessory pathway for sound transfer in a neotropical frog. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[50]  R. R. Capranica,et al.  Two-tone suppression in auditory nerve fibers of the green treefrog (Hyla cinerea). , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[51]  H. Gerhardt,et al.  Significance of two frequency bands in long distance vocal communication in the green treefrog , 1976, Nature.

[52]  E D Young,et al.  Discharge patterns of single fibers in the pigeon auditory nerve. , 1974, Brain research.

[53]  Carl Gans,et al.  On the mechanism of respiration in the bullfrog, Rana catesbeiana: A reassessment , 1969 .

[54]  North American Frogs and Toads , Nature.