Residential Energy Efficient Device Adoption in South Africa

Abstract In recent years there has been a major drive for the adoption of energy efficient devices in the residential sector of South Africa. The public utility company has introduced incentives for solar and heat pump water heaters, and has begun a residential mass rollout program, in order to encourage this adoption. In this paper we attempt to evaluate a consumer’s decision when purchasing energy efficient devices in order to determine whether current incentives are focused towards the technologies that consumers are seeking. Since the adoption of energy efficient devices is a purchasing decision by the consumer, we created a Hierarchical Decision Model (HDM) in order to understand this decision. We created two scenarios in order to analyze the model, one without incentives from the utility, and one with incentives. We established that the addition of incentives for heat pump water heaters and solar water heaters shifted the preference of these technologies above the other technologies, possibly justifying the large investments in the 2010/2011 financial period. This model could be used to give insight into the incentive structure for a utility company introducing new technologies to the market. Additionally, if a company wants to encourage the adoption of a specific energy efficient technology, it could use the model to determine how it is positioned against other technologies and adjust pricing, incentives, and investments into the research and development of the device.

[1]  Naim Afgan,et al.  MULTI-CRITERIA ASSESSMENT OF NEW AND RENEWABLE ENERGY POWER PLANTS , 2002 .

[2]  Tugrul U. Daim,et al.  Evaluation of energy storage technologies for integration with renewable electricity: Quantifying expert opinions , 2012 .

[3]  Naim Afgan,et al.  Multi-criteria evaluation of natural gas resources , 2007 .

[4]  Heracles Polatidis,et al.  Renewable energy projects: structuring a multi-criteria group decision-making framework , 2003 .

[5]  Naim Afgan,et al.  Sustainability assessment tool for the decision making in selection of energy system—Bosnian case , 2007 .

[6]  Pin-Yu Chu,et al.  A fuzzy AHP application in government-sponsored R&D project selection☆ , 2008 .

[7]  Tugrul U. Daim,et al.  A taxonomic review of methods and tools applied in technology assessment , 2008 .

[8]  S. Lee,et al.  A study on making a long-term improvement in the national energy efficiency and GHG control plans by the AHP approach , 2007 .

[9]  T. Daim,et al.  Selection of Renewable Energy Technologies for a Developing County: A Case of Pakistan , 2011 .

[10]  Tugrul U. Daim,et al.  Technology assessment for clean energy technologies: The case of the Pacific Northwest , 2009 .

[11]  Nourou Khalidou Dia,et al.  Application of a multi-criteria analysis for the selection of the most suitable energy source and water desalination system in Mauritania , 2010 .

[12]  Petros A. Pilavachi,et al.  Objective and subjective evaluation of power plants and their non-radioactive emissions using the analytic hierarchy process , 2007 .

[13]  Haris Ch. Doukas,et al.  Multi-criteria decision aid for the formulation of sustainable technological energy priorities using linguistic variables , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  Dundar F. Kocaoglu,et al.  A decision model for energy resource selection in China , 2009, PICMET '09 - 2009 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology.

[15]  Danae Diakoulaki,et al.  Multi-criteria decision analysis and cost–benefit analysis of alternative scenarios for the power generation sector in Greece , 2007 .

[16]  W. Short.  Tariffs and Charges , 1981 .

[17]  Petros A. Pilavachi,et al.  Technological, economic and sustainability evaluation of power plants using the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2009 .

[18]  Tugrul U. Daim,et al.  Optimizing the NW off-shore wind turbine design , 2012, Math. Comput. Model..

[19]  Jiangjiang Wang,et al.  Fuzzy multi-criteria evaluation model of HVAC schemes in optimal combination weighting method , 2009 .

[20]  Hua Zhang,et al.  Development of multi-criteria decision making model for remanufacturing technology portfolio selection , 2011 .

[21]  Bruce J. Bailey.  A Software Product for the Pairwise Comparison Method ofJudgment Quantification, User Manual , 1991 .

[22]  Jiangjiang Wang,et al.  Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making , 2009 .

[23]  Jonathan Burton,et al.  Is small beautiful? A multicriteria assessment of small-scale energy technology applications in local governments , 2007 .

[24]  Tugrul U. Daim,et al.  A framework for technology assessment: Case of a Thai building material manufacturer , 2009 .

[25]  Petros A. Pilavachi,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of technological, economic and sustainability evaluation of power plants using the analytic hierarchy process , 2009 .

[26]  A. P. Sage,et al.  Emerging technology-evaluation methodology: with application to micro-electromechanical systems , 1993 .

[27]  Petros A. Pilavachi,et al.  Multicriteria evaluation of power plants impact on the living standard using the analytic hierarchy process , 2008 .

[28]  Maurizio Cellura,et al.  Decision-making in energy planning. Application of the Electre method at regional level for the diffusion of renewable energy technology , 2003 .

[29]  Joseph F. Coates,et al.  A 21st century agenda for technology assessment , 2001 .

[30]  H. Aras,et al.  Evaluation of alternative fuels for residential heating in Turkey using analytic network process (ANP) with group decision-making , 2006 .