Emergence and Role of Cultural Boundary Spanners in Global Engineering Project Networks

Engineering project networks are increasingly global in scope and outsourcing is increasingly common. Along with globalizing trends in project delivery, the workforce is also globalizing. It is common for engineers to move to other countries as expatriate workers or as emigrants to pursue job opportunities in other firms. Where much is known about global networks of engineers collaborating on projects, little is known about the mediating role played by individuals that share the same nationality as an international partner on a project. In this paper, we examine two project teams executing complex, reciprocally interdependent design projects in India. One team was comprised of Indians and Americans. The other team was identical, but also contained an Indian national who had studied and worked in the United States. Both teams worked on similar design schedule optimization problems. Over the duration of three days, we examined the interactions of the teams assembled to finalize their designs. Through quantitative network analysis and qualitative observations of the cross-cultural interactions, we found the Indian expatriate to play a cultural boundary spanning role resolving cross-cultural knowledge system conflicts and increasing collaboration effectiveness. We induce a propositional theoretical model of cultural boundary spanning in global engineering project networks.

[1]  David Arditi,et al.  Implications of Culture in the Performance of International Construction Joint Ventures , 2008 .

[2]  Martine R. Haas,et al.  Acquiring and Applying Knowledge in Transnational Teams: The Roles of Cosmopolitans and Locals , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[3]  Wenpin Tsai,et al.  Social networks and organizations , 2003 .

[4]  Hans-Georg Gemünden,et al.  Interteam Coordination, Project Commitment, and Teamwork in Multiteam R&D Projects: A Longitudinal Study , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[5]  R. Cross,et al.  The people who make organizations go--or stop. , 2002, Harvard business review.

[6]  Maoshan Qiang,et al.  Cross-Cultural Understanding of Construction Project Managers’ Conceptions of Their Work , 2009 .

[7]  Arthur P. Brief,et al.  Research in Organizational Behavior: An Annual Series of Analytical Essays and Critical Reviews , 2003 .

[8]  Yadong Luo,et al.  Antecedents and Consequences of Personal Attachment in Cross-Cultural Cooperative Ventures , 2001 .

[9]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[10]  Yadong Lu.  Toward the micro and macro-level consequences of interactional justice in cross-cultural joint ventures , 2006 .

[11]  A. Strauss,et al.  The Discovery of Grounded Theory , 1967 .

[12]  X. Song,et al.  The Impact of Strategy on Conflict: A Cross- National Comparative Study of U.S. and Japanese firms , 1997 .

[13]  Raymond Y. C. Tse,et al.  Cultural Considerations in International Construction Contracts , 2003 .

[14]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  SUBGROUP DYNAMICS IN INTERNATIONALLY DISTRIBUTED TEAMS: ETHNOCENTRISM OR CROSS-NATIONAL LEARNING? , 2004 .

[15]  Paul Williams,et al.  The Competent Boundary Spanner , 2002 .

[16]  Irving M. Lane,et al.  A note on the role of laboratory methodologies in applied behavioural research: Don't throw out the baby with the bath water , 1988 .

[17]  Jacob L. Moreno,et al.  The Sociometry Reader. , 1961 .

[18]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Out of Sight, Out of Sync: Understanding Conflict in Distributed Teams , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[19]  Vladimir Batagelj,et al.  Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek , 2005 .

[20]  Frank E. Jones,et al.  The Sociometry Reader , 1961 .

[21]  Damodara U. Kini.  Global Project Management – Not Business As Usual , 2000 .

[22]  Paul Chinowsky,et al.  Social Network Model of Construction , 2008 .

[23]  J. Alberto Espinosa,et al.  Team Boundary Issues Across Multiple Global Firms , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[24]  James C. Porter.  Facilitating Cultural Diversity , 1995 .

[25]  R. Friedman,et al.  Differentiation of Boundary Spanning Roles: Labor Negotiations and Implications for Role Conflict , 1992 .

[26]  Bart Bossink,et al.  Managing drivers of innovation in construction networks , 2004 .

[27]  Ashwin Mahalingam,et al.  Institutional Theory as a Framework for Analyzing Conflicts on Global Projects , 2007 .

[28]  Colin Eden,et al.  Action research for the study of organizations , 1996 .

[29]  Andrew Parker,et al.  The Hidden Power of Social Networks: Understanding How Work Really Gets Done in Organizations , 2004 .

[30]  G. Hofstede.  The Cultural Relativity of Organizational Practices and Theories , 1983 .

[31]  Howard E. Aldrich,et al.  Boundary Spanning Roles and Organization Structure , 1977 .

[32]  John E. Taylor,et al.  Offshore outsourcing in global design networks , 2009 .

[33]  Ashish Kumar,et al.  LEADERSHIP AND ORGANIZATIONAL VISION IN MANAGING A MULTIETHNIC AND MULTICULTURAL PROJECT TEAM , 2000 .

[34]  L. Dyer,et al.  Right from the Start: Exploring the Effects of Early Team Events on Subsequent Project Team Development and Performance , 2004 .

[35]  Emmanuelle Vaast,et al.  Turning a Community into a Market: A Practice Perspective on Information Technology Use in Boundary Spanning , 2006, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[36]  Emmanuelle Vaast,et al.  Innovating or Doing as Told? Status Differences and Overlapping Boundaries in Offshore Collaboration , 2008, MIS Q..

[37]  Emmanuelle Vaast,et al.  The Emergence of Boundary Spanning Competence in Practice: Implications for Implementation and Use of Information Systems , 2005, MIS Q..

[38]  Paul T. Bryant.  Decline of the Engineering Class: Effects of Global Outsourcing of Engineering Services , 2006 .