ICT Intermediates, Growth and Productivity Spillovers Evidence from Comparison of Growth Effects in German and US Manufacturing Sectors

Recent pre-crisis growth accounting exercises attribute strong productivity growth to increased investments in information and communication technologies (ICT), especially during the mid-1990s. EU-wide stylized facts about a growing US–EU productivity gap are confirmed for Germany, particularly showing no substantially economy-wide effects from ICT for German sectors. Tracing the effect from ICT during the period 1991–2005, this study takes a different view by expanding the concept of value added to gross output, additionally including different types of intermediate inputs. The findings suggest that imported intermediate inputs played a more dominating role in Germany than in the US, particularly imported non-ICT and ICT materials, although domestically-produced ICT materials were important as well. In the US, main driving forces were domesticallyproduced non-ICT services and ICT materials, even though imported ICT materials were on the upraise post 1995. Moreover, there were decisive differences is countries’ TFP growth rates with about twice the size in the US. According to robust econometric analysis there have been strong spillover effects from increasing domestically-produced ICT materials in German TFP growth, while for the US TFP growth originated from increasing imported ICT materials. It will be argued that these different productivity effects stem from different functions of ICT in the production process. However, TFP growth differentials between Germany and the US during 1991 to 2000 are explained to a great extent by strong US TFP growth in the Electrical & Electronic Machinery sector.

[1]  H. Sinn Basar-Ökonomie Deutschland - Exportweltmeister oder Schusslicht? , 2005 .

[2]  J. Beaulieu,et al.  A Consistent Accounting of U.S. Productivity Growth , 2004 .

[3]  C. Jessberger Multilateral Environmental Agreements Up to 2050: Are They Sustainable Enough? , 2011 .

[4]  Jozef Konings,et al.  Trade Liberalization, Intermediate Inputs, and Productivity: Evidence from Indonesia , 2005, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[5]  Stefan Kipar,et al.  The Effect of Restrictive Bank Lending on Innovation: Evidence from a Financial Crisis , 2011 .

[6]  Norihiko Yamano,et al.  The OECD Input-Output Database: 2006 Edition , 2006 .

[7]  Gabriel Felbermayr,et al.  Export Credit Guarantees and Export Performance: An Empirical Analysis for Germany , 2013 .

[8]  Gabriel Felbermayr,et al.  Kyoto and the carbon footprint of nations , 2012 .

[9]  D. Jorgenson Information Technology and the U.S. Economy , 2001 .

[10]  James A. Robinson,et al.  Income and Democracy? , 2005 .

[11]  Stephen D. Oliner,et al.  Federal Reserve Board , 2001 .

[12]  Martin Schlotter,et al.  Age at Preschool Entrance and Noncognitive Skills before School - An Instrumental Variable Approach , 2011 .

[13]  Jack E. Triplett,et al.  Productivity in the U.S. Services Sector: New Sources of Economic Growth , 2004 .

[14]  Joel Rodrigue,et al.  Does the Use of Imported Intermediates Increase Productivity? Plant-Level Evidence , 2008 .

[15]  Dale W. Jorgenson,et al.  Productivity and U.S. Economic Growth , 1999 .

[17]  Erik Hornung,et al.  Immigration and the Diffusion of Technology: The Huguenot Diaspora in Prussia , 2011, Migrationsforschung – interdisziplinär & diskursiv.

[18]  Gabriel Felbermayr,et al.  Endogenous labor market institutions in an open economy , 2012 .

[19]  K. Stiroh Information Technology and the U.S. Productivity Revival: What Do the Industry Data Say? , 2001 .

[20]  Thomas Strobel,et al.  The Ifo Industry Growth Accounting Database , 2007, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[21]  Dale W. Jorgenson,et al.  Productivity and Economic Growth , 1990 .

[22]  A. Khandelwal,et al.  Imported Intermediate Inputs and Domestic Product Growth: Evidence from India , 2008 .

[23]  Mario Larch,et al.  Income and democracy: Evidence from system GMM estimates , 2012 .

[24]  Michael J. Harper,et al.  Multifactor Productivity in U.S. Manufacturing, 1949-83 , 1987 .

[25]  Panu Poutvaara,et al.  Preferences for Redistribution among Emigrantsfrom a Welfare State , 2012 .

[26]  Stefan Arent,et al.  The Price of Security: On the Causality and Impact of Lay-off Risks on Wages , 2011 .

[27]  Gabriel Felbermayr,et al.  What a Difference Kyoto Made: Evidence from Instrumental Variables Estimation , 2011 .

[28]  C. Hulten Growth Accounting with Intermediate Inputs , 1978 .

[29]  Marc Piopiunik,et al.  Intergenerational Transmission of Education and Mediating Channels: Evidence from a Compulsory Schooling Reform in Germany , 2014 .

[30]  Stefan Arent,et al.  Unemployment Benefit and Wages: The Impact of the Labor Market Reform in Germany on (Reservation) Wages , 2011 .

[31]  R. Gordon,et al.  The Role of Labor Market Changes in the Slowdown of European Productivity Growth , 2008 .

[32]  Johannes Van Biesebroeck,et al.  The Sensitivity of Productivity Estimates , 2008 .

[33]  Samuel Kortum Comment on: "Importing technology" , 2004 .

[34]  F. Goetzke,et al.  Climate-friendly technologies in the mobile air-conditioning sector: a patent citation analysis , 2013 .

[35]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND PRODUCTIVITY , 1999 .

[36]  Johannes Van Biesebroeck,et al.  Revisiting Some Productivity Debates , 2003 .

[37]  G. Grossman,et al.  Innovation and growth in the global economy , 1993 .

[38]  Mario Larch,et al.  Migration, Trade and Unemployment , 2012 .

[39]  Rahel Aichele,et al.  Estimating the Effects of Kyoto on Bilateral Trade Flows Using Matching Econometrics , 2013 .