Error analysis for polychromatic speckle contrast measurements

Abstract Revival of interest in speckle technologies raises a curial question on the accuracy calculation of speckle measurements. In particular, the accuracy calculation of speckle contrast, an important metrics of a stochastic process, is quite different from the accuracy calculation of a typical intensity measurement. Speckle contrast depends more on stochastic characteristics of a process rather than on hardware characteristics. In this article, we consider errors introduced by the limited number of available speckle and by intensity saturation for monochromatic and polychromatic speckles. Equations for these types of errors were derived. Particularly, we show that the error due to limited number of speckles is inversely proportional to the square root of the speckle number, in the similar way as the average intensity error. For the error due to limited dynamic range of a recording device, the truncation effect increases the error as the mean intensity increased. Monochromatic speckles are more sensitive to such truncation than polychromatic speckles. We report the optimal mean intensity in terms of the pixel depth of a recording device and the total number of speckle recorded. In addition, a recommendation to minimize the saturation error for a typical camera is included.

[1]  Lioudmila Tchvialeva,et al.  Skin Roughness Assessment , 2010 .

[2]  Lioudmila Tchvialeva,et al.  Influence of geometry on polychromatic speckle contrast. , 2007, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[3]  Catherine Hun,et al.  Speckle techniques for pavement surface analysis , 2003, Speckle: International Conference on Speckle Metrology.

[4]  Donald D Duncan,et al.  Detrimental effects of speckle-pixel size matching in laser speckle contrast imaging. , 2008, Optics letters.

[5]  D. Boas,et al.  Laser speckle contrast imaging in biomedical optics. , 2010, Journal of biomedical optics.

[6]  R. Sirohi Speckle Metrology , 1993, Optical Methods of Measurement.

[7]  Lioudmila Tchvialeva,et al.  Surface roughness measurement by speckle contrast under the illumination of light with arbitrary spectral profile , 2010 .

[8]  A M Weiner,et al.  Characterization and imaging in optically scattering media by use of laser speckle and a variable-coherence source. , 2000, Optics letters.

[9]  Gang Yao,et al.  Imaging obscured subsurface inhomogeneity using laser speckle. , 2005, Optics express.

[10]  Alexander P Sviridov,et al.  Speckle-contrast monitoring of tissue thermal modification. , 2002, Applied optics.

[11]  Stuart K Williams,et al.  Texture analysis of speckle in optical coherence tomography images of tissue phantoms. , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  J. Briers Surface Roughness Evaluation , 1993 .

[13]  J. Rice Mathematical Statistics and Data Analysis , 1988 .

[14]  Amneet Gulati,et al.  Laser speckle imaging of atherosclerotic plaques through optical fiber bundles. , 2008, Journal of biomedical optics.

[15]  Domenico Campolo,et al.  New Developments in Biomedical Engineering , 2010 .

[16]  V. Tuchin Handbook of Optical Biomedical Diagnostics , 2002 .