The Influence of Emotion Expression on Perceptions of Trustworthiness in Negotiation

When interacting with computer agents, people make inferences about various characteristics of these agents, such as their reliability and trustworthiness. These perceptions are significant, as they influence people's behavior towards the agents, and may foster or inhibit repeated interactions between them. In this paper we investigate whether computer agents can use the expression of emotion to influence human perceptions of trustworthiness. In particular, we study human-computer interactions within the context of a negotiation game, in which players make alternating offers to decide on how to divide a set of resources. A series of negotiation games between a human and several agents is then followed by a "trust game." In this game people have to choose one among several agents to interact with, as well as how much of their resources they will trust to it. Our results indicate that, among those agents that displayed emotion, those whose expression was in accord with their actions (strategy) during the negotiation game were generally preferred as partners in the trust game over those whose emotion expressions and actions did not mesh. Moreover, we observed that when emotion does not carry useful new information, it fails to strongly influence human decision-making behavior in a negotiation setting.

[1]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  Investigating the benefits of automated negotiations in enhancing people's negotiation skills , 2009, AAMAS.

[2]  J. Nash.  THE BARGAINING PROBLEM , 1950, Classics in Game Theory.

[3]  Darren Gergle,et al.  Effects of four computer-mediated communications channels on trust development , 2002, CHI.

[4]  A. Manstead,et al.  An interpersonal approach to emotion in social decision making: the emotions as social information model , 2010 .

[5]  Gerben A. van Kleef,et al.  The Interpersonal Effects of Anger and Happiness on Negotiation Behavior and Outcomes , 2003 .

[6]  N. R. Jennings,et al.  To appear in: Int Journal of Group Decision and Negotiation GDN2000 Keynote Paper Automated Negotiation: Prospects, Methods and Challenges , 2022 .

[7]  C. Gibson,et al.  Culture and international business: recent advances and their implications for future research , 2005 .

[8]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Etiquette equality: exhibitions and expectations of computer politeness , 2004, CACM.

[9]  J. Rubin,et al.  Negotiation , 1983 .

[10]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Improving automotive safety by pairing driver emotion and car voice emotion , 2005, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[11]  D. G. Pruitt,et al.  NEGOTIATION AND MEDIATION , 1992 .

[12]  Pattie Maes,et al.  Agents that buy and sell , 1999, CACM.

[13]  M. Morris,et al.  Rapport in conflict resolution: Accounting for how face-to-face contact fosters mutual cooperation in mixed-motive conflicts. , 2000 .

[14]  C. Nass,et al.  Machines and Mindlessness , 2000 .

[15]  Jonathan Gratch,et al.  The Influence of Emotions in Embodied Agents on Human Decision-Making , 2010, IVA.

[16]  H. Raiffa.  The Art & Science of Negotiation , 1983 .

[17]  Raimo P. Hämäläinen,et al.  Handbook of Group Decision and Negotiation , 2010 .

[18]  Eric Horvitz,et al.  Collaboration and shared plans in the open world: studies of ridesharing , 2009, IJCAI 2009.

[19]  D. Marc Kilgour,et al.  Handbook of Group Decision and Negotiation , 2014, Advances in Group Decision and Negotiation.

[20]  M. Clark.  Emotion and social behavior , 1992 .

[21]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  Can automated agents proficiently negotiate with humans? , 2010, CACM.

[22]  H. Raiffa.  The art and science of negotiation , 1983 .