Appraising current methods for preclinical calculation of burn size - A pre-hospital perspective.

BACKGROUND Calculation of the percentage of total body surface area burnt is a vital tool in the assessment and management of patients sustaining burns. Guiding both treatment and management protocols. Currently there is debate as to which method of estimation is the most appropriate for pre-hospital use. METHODS A literature review was undertaken to appraise current literature and determine the most appropriate methods for the pre-hospital setting. The review utilised MEDLINE and structured hand searching of Science Direct, OpenAthens, COCHRANE and Google Scholar. RESULTS Fourteen studies were identified for review comparing various methods. The palm including digits was identified to represent 0.8% of total body surface area with the palm excluding digits representing 0.5%. Wallace's Rule of Nines was found to be an appropriate method of estimation. Variation in accuracy is accountable to expertise, experience and patients body type however current technology and smartphone applications are attempting to counter this. CONCLUSIONS Palm including digits measurements multiplied by 0.8 is suitable for assessing minor (<10%) burns however for larger burns Wallace's Rule of Nines is advocated. Further development of technology suggests computerised applications will become more commonplace.

[1]  R. Sheridan,et al.  Planimetry study of the percent of body surface represented by the hand and palm: sizing irregular burns is more accurately done with the palm. , 1995, The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation.

[2]  L. Cancio,et al.  Simple derivation of the initial fluid rate for the resuscitation of severely burned adult combat casualties: in silico validation of the rule of 10. , 2010, The Journal of trauma.

[3]  T. Burge,et al.  A comparison of serial halving and the rule of nines as a pre-hospital assessment tool in burns. , 2005, British journal of plastic surgery.

[4]  Cheryl Tatano Beck,et al.  Essentials of Nursing Research: Appraising Evidence for Nursing Practice , 2001 .

[5]  E. Tredget,et al.  Infection control in the burn unit. , 2011, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[6]  K. Porter,et al.  Consensus on the prehospital approach to burns patient management , 2004, Emergency Medicine Journal.

[7]  John G Harvey,et al.  Burn size estimation in children: Still a problem , 2012, Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA.

[8]  Ian Mursell,et al.  Manual of Clinical Paramedic Procedures , 2010 .

[9]  P. Saukko,et al.  Burns and Scalds , 2015 .

[10]  Catherine M. Hurt Determining the approximate area of a burn: An inconsistency investigated and re-evaluated , 1997 .

[11]  M. Cooke,et al.  UK ambulance services clinical practice guidelines 2013 , 2013 .

[12]  D. Miminas A critical evaluation of the Lund and Browder chart , 2007 .

[13]  Rajive Mathew Jose,et al.  Burns area estimation-an error perpetuated. , 2004, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[14]  N. Rossiter,et al.  How big is a hand? , 1996, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[15]  J. Rhodes,et al.  The surface area of the hand and the palm for estimating percentage of total body surface area: results of a meta‐analysis , 2013, The British journal of dermatology.

[16]  P. Agarwal,et al.  Determination of hand and palm area as a ratio of body surface area in Indian population , 2010, Indian journal of plastic surgery : official publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons of India.

[17]  A H Roberts,et al.  The influence of body mass index on burn surface area estimated from the area of the hand. , 2001, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[18]  L. Blackbourne,et al.  Prehospital Burn Management in a Combat Zone , 2012, Prehospital emergency care : official journal of the National Association of EMS Physicians and the National Association of State EMS Directors.

[19]  C. Malic,et al.  Resuscitation burn card--a useful tool for burn injury assessment. , 2007, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[20]  D. Church,et al.  Burn Wound Infections , 2006, Clinical Microbiology Reviews.

[21]  K. Allison,et al.  Consensus On The Pre-hospital Approach To Burns Patient Management , 2004, Injury.

[22]  P. Maitz,et al.  Improving accuracy of burn referrals through the use of an internet-based burns chart , 2011, European Journal of Plastic Surgery.

[23]  J. Scarisbrick,et al.  How big is your hand and should you use it to score skin in cutaneous T‐cell lymphoma? , 2013, The British journal of dermatology.

[24]  Gill. Hek,et al.  Making sense of research , 2001 .

[25]  C. Berry,et al.  The inter-rater reliability of estimating the size of burns from various burn area chart drawings. , 2000, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[26]  J. Dirnberger,et al.  The determination of total burn surface area: How much difference? , 2013, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.