Online instructional effort measured through the lens of teaching presence in the community of inquiry framework: A re-examination of measures and approach

With more than 4 million students enrolled in online courses in the US alone (Allen & Seaman, 2010), it is now time to inquire into the nature of instructional effort in online environments. Reflecting the community of inquiry (CoI) framework (Garrison, Anderson, & Archer, 2000) this paper addresses the following questions: How has instructor teaching presence (Anderson, Rourke, Garrison, & Archer, 2001) traditionally been viewed by researchers? What does productive instructor effort look like in an entire course, not just the main threaded discussion? Results suggest that conventional research approaches, based on quantitative content analysis, fail to account for the majority of teaching presence behaviors and thus may significantly under represent productive online instructional effort.

[1]  Eilif Trondsen,et al.  Learning on Demand , 1997, J. Knowl. Manag..

[2]  Zehra Akyol.  Examining teaching presence, social presence, cognitive presence, satisfaction and learning in online and blended course contexts , 2009 .

[3]  Peter Shea,et al.  Learning presence: Towards a theory of self-efficacy, self-regulation, and the development of a communities of inquiry in online and blended learning environments , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[4]  Arthur Bangert,et al.  The influence of social presence and teaching presence on the quality of online critical inquiry , 2008, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[5]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  The Online Interaction Learning Model: An Integrated Theoretical Framework for Learning Networks , 2004 .

[6]  César Coll,et al.  Distributed Teaching Presence and Participants' Activity Profiles: a theoretical approach to the structural analysis of Asynchronous Learning Networks† , 2009 .

[7]  Yong Zhao,et al.  What Makes the Difference? A Practical Analysis of Research on the Effectiveness of Distance Education , 2005, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[8]  P. O'Sullivan,et al.  A case study of teaching presence in virtual problem-based learning groups , 2006, Medical teacher.

[9]  D. Garrison,et al.  The Development of a Community of Inquiry over Time in an Online Course: Understanding the Progression and Integration of Social, Cognitive and Teaching Presence. , 2008 .

[10]  L. Shulman.  Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching , 1986 .

[11]  Colla J. MacDonald,et al.  Learners' Perspectives on what is Missing from Online Learning: Interpretations through the Community of Inquiry Framework , 2006 .

[12]  D. Randy Garrison,et al.  Critical Thinking and Computer Conferencing: A Model and Tool to Assess Cognitive Presence , 2001 .

[13]  Heather Kanuka,et al.  The influence of instructional methods on the quality of online discussion , 2006, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[14]  Hilda R. Glazer,et al.  Creating shared understanding through chats in a community of inquiry , 2007, Internet High. Educ..

[15]  Nicholas Omale,et al.  Learning in 3-D multiuser virtual environments: Exploring the use of unique 3-D attributes for online problem-based learning , 2009, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[16]  A. Feinstein,et al.  High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes. , 1990, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[17]  Hwee Ling Lim,et al.  Community of Inquiry in an Online Undergraduate Information Technology Course , 2007, J. Inf. Technol. Educ..

[18]  Sarah Schrire,et al.  Knowledge building in asynchronous discussion groups: Going beyond quantitative analysis , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[19]  Gayle V. Davidson-Shivers.  Frequency and Types of Instructor-Interactions in Online Instruction , 2009 .

[20]  Heather Kanuka,et al.  Learning in Communities of Inquiry: A Review of the Literature , 2009 .

[21]  Zane L. Berge,et al.  Facilitating Computer Conferencing: Recommendations from the Field. , 1995 .

[22]  M. Holmes,et al.  Evaluation of the evidence. , 2007, The Veterinary clinics of North America. Small animal practice.

[23]  T. Waits.  Distance Education at Degree-Granting Postsecondary Institutions: 2000-2001. E.D. Tabs. , 2003 .

[24]  Frank McCluskey,et al.  Student Perceptions of the Relationship between Indicators of Teaching Presence and Success in Online Courses , 2010 .

[25]  Gregory W. Hislop.  Does teaching online take more time? , 2001, 31st Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Impact on Engineering and Science Education. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37193).

[26]  Dc Washington,et al.  Distance education at degree-granting postsecondary institutions: (NCES -044). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education for Education Statistics. , 2009 .

[27]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Becoming a Virtual Professor: Pedagogical Roles and Asynchronous Learning Networks , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[28]  B. Zimmerman,et al.  Self-regulated learning and academic achievement : theoretical perspectives , 2001 .

[29]  I. E. Allen,et al.  Learning on Demand: Online Education in the United States, 2009. , 2010 .

[30]  P. Gorsky,et al.  Online Teaching Effectiveness: A Tale of Two Instructors , 2009 .

[31]  D. Garrison,et al.  Assessing Social Presence In Asynchronous Text-based Computer Conferencing , 1999 .

[32]  M. Allen,et al.  Comparing Student Satisfaction With Distance Education to Traditional Classrooms in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis , 2002 .

[33]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Faculty Roles and Satisfaction in Asynchronous Learning Networks , 2004 .

[34]  P. Shea,et al.  A study of teaching presence and student sense of learning community in fully online and web-enhanced college courses , 2006, Internet High. Educ..

[35]  D. Randy Garrison,et al.  Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education , 1999, Internet High. Educ..

[36]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Cooperation and the Use of Technology , 2007 .

[37]  I. E. Allen,et al.  Staying the course: online education in the United States, 2008 , 2008 .

[38]  Seugnet Blignaut,et al.  Developing a taxonomy of faculty participation in asynchronous learning environments - an exploratory investigation , 2003, Comput. Educ..

[39]  Robert M. Bernard,et al.  How Does Distance Education Compare With Classroom Instruction? A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature , 2004 .

[40]  Walter Archer,et al.  Beyond online discussions: Extending the community of inquiry framework to entire courses , 2010, Internet High. Educ..

[41]  Rena M. Palloff,et al.  Book Review: Building online learning communities: Effective strategies for the virtual classroom , 2007 .

[42]  Barbara Means,et al.  Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies , 2009 .

[43]  D. Garrison,et al.  Methodological Issues in the Content Analysis of Computer Conference Transcripts , 2007 .

[44]  D. Randy Garrison,et al.  Creating cognitive presence in a blended faculty development community , 2005, Internet High. Educ..

[45]  B. Annexure.  DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION , 2002 .

[46]  J. Gerring.  A case study , 2011, Technology and Society.

[47]  Mary K. Tallent-Runnels,et al.  Teaching Courses Online: A Review of the Research , 2006 .

[48]  Joan L. Whipp,et al.  Cognitive and social help giving in online teaching: an exploratory study , 2009 .

[49]  David S. Stein,et al.  Role Of Social Presence, Choice Of Online Or Face-To-Face Group Format, And Satisfaction With Perceived Knowledge Gained In A Distance Learning Environment , 2003 .

[50]  Peter Shea,et al.  A re-examination of the community of inquiry framework: Social network and content analysis , 2010, Internet High. Educ..

[51]  Michael Simonson,et al.  Simonson on the five themes at the foundation of Teaching and Learning at a Distance: Foundations of Distance Education , 2002 .