Carbon Dioxide Balance of Wood Substitution: Comparing Concrete- and Wood-Framed Buildings

In this study a method is suggested to compare the net carbon dioxide (CO2) emission from the construction of concrete- and wood-framed buildings. The method is then applied to two buildings in Sweden and Finland constructed with wood frames, compared with functionally equivalent buildings constructed with concrete frames. Carbon accounting includes: emissions due to fossil fuel use in the production of building materials; the replacement of fossil fuels by biomass residues from logging, wood processing, construction and demolition; carbon stock changes in forests and buildings; and cement process reactions. The results show that wood-framed construction requires less energy, and emits less CO2 to the atmosphere, than concrete-framed construction. The lifecycle emission difference between the wood- and concrete-framed buildings ranges from 30 to 130 kg C per m2 of floor area. Hence, a net reduction of CO2 emission can be obtained by increasing the proportion of wood-based building materials, relative to concrete materials. The benefits would be greatest if the biomass residues resulting from the production of the wood building materials were fully used in energy supply systems. The carbon mitigation efficiency, expressed in terms of biomass used per unit of reduced carbon emission, is considerably better if the wood is used to replace concrete building material than if the wood is used directly as biofuel.

[1]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  Towards a Standard Methodology for Greenhouse Gas Balances of Bioenergy Systems in Comparison with Fossil Energy Systems , 1997 .

[2]  T. M. Bezemer,et al.  Herbivory in global climate change research: direct effects of rising temperature on insect herbivores , 2002 .

[3]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  CO2 mitigation cost: A System Perspective on the Heating of Detached Houses , 2002 .

[4]  Andrew H. Buchanan,et al.  Wood-based building materials and atmospheric carbon emissions , 1999 .

[5]  J. Houghton,et al.  Climate change 1995: the science of climate change. , 1996 .

[6]  G. Marland,et al.  The role of forest and bioenergy strategies in the global carbon cycle , 1996 .

[7]  Raymond J. Cole,et al.  Energy and greenhouse gas emissions associated with the construction of alternative structural systems , 1998 .

[8]  Klaus Richter,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of Wood Products , 1998 .

[9]  P. Börjesson.  Energy Analysis of Biomass Production and Transportation , 1996 .

[10]  Andrew H. Buchanan,et al.  Energy and carbon dioxide implications of building construction , 1994 .

[11]  Anne-Marie Tillman,et al.  LCA of building frame structures : environmetal impact over the life cycle of wooden and concrete frames , 1997 .

[12]  Veronika Dornburg,et al.  Multi-functional biomass systems , 2004 .

[13]  R. K. Dixon,et al.  Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change , 1998 .

[14]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  Project-based Greenhouse Gas Accounting : guiding principles with a focus on baselines and additionality , 2000 .

[15]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  Cogeneration: One way to use biomass efficiently , 1994 .

[16]  Gregory A. Keoleian,et al.  Life cycle energy and environmental performance of a new university building: modeling challenges and design implications , 2003 .

[17]  Antonio Aguado,et al.  Comparative analysis of available life cycle inventories of cement in the EU , 2004 .

[18]  Anna Lundborg,et al.  A sustainable forest fuel system in Sweden , 1998 .

[19]  K. Pingoud,et al.  Studies on greenhouse impacts of wood construction: 1. Scenario analysis of potential wood utilisation in Finnish new construction in 1990 and 1994 2. Inventory of carbon stock of wood products in the Finnish building stock in 1980, 1990 and 1995. , 2000 .

[20]  Charles J. Kibert,et al.  Defining an ecology of construction , 2003 .

[21]  H Herzog,et al.  Capturing greenhouse gases. , 2000, Scientific American.

[22]  Anna Bengtson,et al.  Framing Technological Development in a Concrete Context : The Use of Wood in the Swedish Construction Industry , 2003 .

[23]  P. Börjesson,et al.  Greenhouse gas balances in building construction : wood versus concrete from life-cycle and forest land-use perspectives , 2000 .

[24]  Karin Adalberth,et al.  Energy Use and Environmental Impact of New Residential Buildings , 2000 .

[25]  Kim Pingoud,et al.  Fossil carbon emissions associated with carbon flowsof wood products , 2002 .

[26]  Rattan Lal,et al.  Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry , 2015 .

[27]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  Future production and utilisation of biomass in Sweden: potentials and CO2 mitigation , 1997 .

[28]  R. Mollica,et al.  Waging a new kind of war. Invisible wounds. , 2000, Scientific American.

[29]  Jessie A. Micales,et al.  The decomposition of forest products in landfills , 1997 .

[30]  Markus Erhard,et al.  Stemwood volume increment changes in European forests due to climate change—a simulation study with the EFISCEN model , 2002 .

[31]  L. Gustavsson,et al.  Variability in energy and carbon dioxide balances of wood and concrete building materials , 2006 .

[32]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  Reducing CO2 emissions by substituting biomass for fossil fuels , 1995 .

[33]  M. Scharai-Rad,et al.  Environmental and energy balances of wood products and substitutes. , 2002 .

[34]  Juha Heikkinen,et al.  Biomass expansion factors (BEFs) for Scots pine, Norway spruce and birch according to stand age for boreal forests , 2003 .

[35]  Andrew J. Weaver.  The Science of Climate Change , 2003 .

[36]  Peter Domone,et al.  Construction materials : their nature and behaviour , 2001 .

[37]  Richard A. Houghton,et al.  3. Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of carbon dioxide mitigation through forestry and wood industry 3.3. Life cycle assessment of wood products. , 1998 .

[38]  Kim Pingoud,et al.  Which rotation length is favourable to carbon sequestration , 2001 .

[39]  K. Treanton,et al.  Revised 1996 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. v. 1: Greenhouse gas inventory reporting instructions.- v. 2: Greenhouse gas inventory workbook.- v.3: Greenhouse gas inventory reference manual , 1997 .

[40]  P. Koch.  Wood versus nonwood materials in U. S. residential construction; Some energy-related global implications , 1992 .

[41]  Joanna Isobel House,et al.  Climate change 2001 : synthesis report , 2001 .

[42]  Bruce Lippke,et al.  CORRIM: Life-Cycle Environmental Performance of Renewable Building Materials , 2004 .

[43]  Catarina Thormark,et al.  Conservation of energy and natural resources by recycling building waste , 2001 .

[44]  R. Houghton,et al.  Carbon dioxide mitigation in forestry and wood industry. , 1998 .

[45]  Maria Teresa Moreira,et al.  Decolorization of ion-exchange effluents derived from sugar-mill operations by Bjerkandera sp. BOS55 , 1997 .

[46]  O. Davidson,et al.  Climate change 2001 : mitigation , 2001 .

[47]  Charles J. Kibert,et al.  Construction ecology : nature as the basis for green buildings , 2002 .

[48]  Judd Harrison Michael,et al.  Safety in the wood products industry , 2004 .

[49]  Raymond J. Cole,et al.  Life-cycle energy use in office buildings , 1996 .