Estimation of above-ground forest biomass using metrics based on Gaussian decomposition of waveform lidar data

Large-footprint waveform light detection and ranging (lidar) data have been widely used in above-ground forest biomass estimation. Waveform metrics derived from basic statistics (e.g. percentile of energy) of the lidar waveform, such as canopy height and height of median energy, have been applied to biomass estimation in numerous studies. In this study, a set of metrics based on Gaussian decomposition (GD) results were developed and evaluated for forest above-ground biomass estimation using NASA’s laser vegetation imaging sensor (LVIS) data. The GD metrics were designed to explicitly incorporate lidar intensity and vertical structures of canopy layers for biomass estimation. The proposed GD metrics used information related to the above-ground height of each Gaussian centroid and the Gaussian area index (GAI), where GAI is the area covered by a Gaussian function. Two types of novel GD metrics were developed: (1) percentile-height GAI metrics expressing the GAI summation of a subset of Gaussian centroids located within a certain percentile height range; and (2) height-weighted GAI metrics, a summation of GAIs of a waveform weighted by the corresponding heights of their Gaussian centroids. A biomass regression model was built by eight newly developed GD metrics using GAI information and five pre-existing GD-derived metrics that have not previously been used for biomass estimation. The performance of the regression model was then compared to another regression model using 12 previously published metrics (non-GD metrics). The Random Forests (RF) regression algorithm was employed for predicting biomass. The RF out-of-bag results indicated that above-ground biomass estimations using GD metrics achieved significantly better results than those derived from non-GD metrics for deciduous plots (19% lower root mean square error (RMSE), 25% higher coefficient of determination (R2), and marginally better results in coniferous plots (4% lower RSME, 6% higher R2). The combination of GD and non-GD metrics achieved comparable biomass estimation results to the model using exclusively GD metrics. GD metrics also showed strong correlation with forest attributes such as mean diameter at breast height (DBH) and stem density. This study contributes to the usage of GD results for accurate estimation of forest above-ground biomass in large-footprint lidar waveform data in temperate deciduous forests, because temperate deciduous forests have been proved challenging in regard to lidar-derived biomass estimations.

[1]  David B. Clark,et al.  Landscape-scale variation in forest structure and biomass in a tropical rain forest , 2000 .

[2]  R. Nelson,et al.  Regional aboveground forest biomass using airborne and spaceborne LiDAR in Québec. , 2008 .

[3]  Michael A. Lefsky,et al.  Revised method for forest canopy height estimation from Geoscience Laser Altimeter System waveforms , 2007 .

[4]  J. Battles,et al.  RESPONSES OF EARLY SUCCESSIONAL NORTHERN HARDWOOD FORESTS TO CHANGES IN NUTRIENT AVAILABILITY , 1998 .

[5]  Giorgos Mountrakis,et al.  Ground peak identification in dense shrub areas using large footprint waveform LiDAR and Landsat images , 2015, Int. J. Digit. Earth.

[6]  K. Ranson,et al.  Forest vertical structure from GLAS : An evaluation using LVIS and SRTM data , 2008 .

[7]  J. Bryan Blair,et al.  Decomposition of laser altimeter waveforms , 2000, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[8]  H. Zwally,et al.  Overview of ICESat's Laser Measurements of Polar Ice, Atmosphere, Ocean, and Land , 2002 .

[9]  W. Cohen,et al.  Patterns of covariance between forest stand and canopy structure in the Pacific Northwest , 2005 .

[10]  Andy Liaw,et al.  Classification and Regression by randomForest , 2007 .

[11]  M. Flood,et al.  LiDAR remote sensing of forest structure , 2003 .

[12]  Sandra A. Brown.  Measuring carbon in forests: current status and future challenges. , 2002, Environmental pollution.

[13]  Qi Chen.  Retrieving vegetation height of forests and woodlands over mountainous areas in the Pacific Coast region using satellite laser altimetry , 2010 .

[14]  Wenze Yang,et al.  Physically based vertical vegetation structure retrieval from ICESat data: Validation using LVIS in White Mountain National Forest, New Hampshire, USA , 2011 .

[15]  D. R. Cutler,et al.  Utah State University From the SelectedWorks of , 2017 .

[16]  R. D. Nyland,et al.  The development of forest Islands in exurban central New York state , 1986 .

[17]  Hideki Kobayashi,et al.  RAMI4PILPS: An intercomparison of formulations for the partitioning of solar radiation in land surface models , 2011 .

[18]  Charles H. Cannon,et al.  Environmental correlates of tree biomass, basal area, wood specific gravity and stem density gradients in Borneo's tropical forests , 2010 .

[19]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[20]  S. Goetz,et al.  A meta-analysis of terrestrial aboveground biomass estimation using lidar remote sensing , 2013 .

[21]  W. Wagner,et al.  Gaussian decomposition and calibration of a novel small-footprint full-waveform digitising airborne laser scanner , 2006 .

[22]  R. K. Dixon,et al.  Carbon Pools and Flux of Global Forest Ecosystems , 1994, Science.

[23]  R. Dubayah,et al.  Estimation of tropical forest structural characteristics using large-footprint lidar , 2002 .

[24]  Maxim Neumann,et al.  Detecting tropical forest biomass dynamics from repeated airborne lidar measurements , 2013 .

[25]  B. F. Stanton,et al.  The Return of Agricultural Lands to Forest: Changing Land Use in the Twentieth Century , 1996 .

[26]  R. Dubayah,et al.  Integrating waveform lidar with hyperspectral imagery for inventory of a northern temperate forest , 2008 .

[27]  W. M. Lonsdale,et al.  The Self-Thinning Rule: Dead or Alive? , 1990 .

[28]  W. Cohen,et al.  Surface lidar remote sensing of basal area and biomass in deciduous forests of eastern Maryland, USA , 1999 .

[29]  Maurizio Mencuccini,et al.  On simplifying allometric analyses of forest biomass , 2004 .

[30]  W. Cohen,et al.  Estimates of forest canopy height and aboveground biomass using ICESat , 2005 .

[31]  F. M. Danson,et al.  Estimating biomass carbon stocks for a Mediterranean forest in central Spain using LiDAR height and intensity data , 2010 .

[32]  Richard A. Birdsey,et al.  Comprehensive database of diameter-based biomass regressions for North American tree species , 2004 .

[33]  M. Lefsky,et al.  Laser altimeter canopy height profiles: methods and validation for closed-canopy, broadleaf forests , 2001 .

[34]  Giorgos Mountrakis,et al.  An accurate and computationally efficient algorithm for ground peak identification in large footprint waveform LiDAR data , 2014 .

[35]  G. Asner,et al.  Mapping tropical forest carbon: Calibrating plot estimates to a simple LiDAR metric , 2014 .

[36]  R. Dubayah,et al.  Sensitivity of large-footprint lidar to canopy structure and biomass in a neotropical rainforest , 2002 .

[37]  D. B. Coyle,et al.  Optimization of an airborne laser altimeter for remote sensing of vegetation and tree canopies , 1994, Proceedings of IGARSS '94 - 1994 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[38]  M. Nieuwenhuis,et al.  Retrieval of forest structural parameters using LiDAR remote sensing , 2010, European Journal of Forest Research.

[39]  P. Gessler,et al.  Characterizing forest succession with lidar data: An evaluation for the Inland Northwest, USA , 2009 .

[40]  J. Means.  Use of Large-Footprint Scanning Airborne Lidar To Estimate Forest Stand Characteristics in the Western Cascades of Oregon , 1999 .

[41]  Håkan Olsson,et al.  Estimation of 3D vegetation structure from waveform and discrete return airborne laser scanning data , 2012 .

[42]  John R. Miller,et al.  Estimating crop stresses, aboveground dry biomass and yield of corn using multi-temporal optical data combined with a radiation use efficiency model , 2010 .

[43]  A. Hudak,et al.  Nearest neighbor imputation of species-level, plot-scale forest structure attributes from LiDAR data , 2008 .

[44]  Uwe Stilla,et al.  Range determination with waveform recording laser systems using a Wiener Filter , 2006 .

[45]  Jungho Im,et al.  Forest biomass estimation from airborne LiDAR data using machine learning approaches , 2012 .

[46]  A. Strahler,et al.  A clumped-foliage canopy radiative transfer model for a Global Dynamic Terrestrial Ecosystem Model II: Comparison to measurements. , 2010 .

[47]  Philip A. Townsend,et al.  A pseudo-waveform technique to assess forest structure using discrete lidar data , 2011 .

[48]  Robert G. Knox,et al.  The use of waveform lidar to measure northern temperate mixed conifer and deciduous forest structure in New Hampshire , 2006 .

[49]  G. Hurtt,et al.  Estimation of tropical forest height and biomass dynamics using lidar remote sensing at La Selva, Costa Rica , 2009 .

[50]  W. Walker,et al.  Mapping forest structure for wildlife habitat analysis using multi-sensor (LiDAR, SAR/InSAR, ETM+, Quickbird) synergy , 2006 .

[51]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis , 2013 .

[52]  R. Dubayah,et al.  Lidar Remote Sensing for Forestry , 2000, Journal of Forestry.

[53]  T. J. Carleton,et al.  Mortality and Self-thinning in Postfire Black Spruce , 1987 .

[54]  M. Ashton,et al.  Measuring Carbon in Forests , 2012 .

[55]  A. Neuenschwander,et al.  Characterization of ICESat/GLAS waveforms over terrestrial ecosystems: Implications for vegetation mapping , 2008 .

[56]  P. Marks,et al.  Two hundred years of forest cover changes in Tompkins County, New York' , 1993 .

[57]  J. Blair,et al.  The Laser Vegetation Imaging Sensor: a medium-altitude, digitisation-only, airborne laser altimeter for mapping vegetation and topography , 1999 .

[58]  Kenneth B. Pierce,et al.  Quantification of live aboveground forest biomass dynamics with Landsat time-series and field inventory data: A comparison of empirical modeling approaches , 2010 .