Choosing Social Situations: The Relation Between Automatically Activated Racial Attitudes and Anticipated Comfort Interacting With African Americans

This research explored how White students’ automatically activated racial attitudes and motivations to control prejudiced reactions (MCPR) related to their self-reported comfort and willingness to interact with Black partners in a variety of situations. Participants completed the MCPR scale and a priming task that provides an unobtrusive measure of automatically activated racial attitudes. In a later session, participants rated their comfort and willingness to enter eight situations varying in their degree of intimacy and scriptedness and then rerated each situation while imagining different interaction partners, including a Black individual. When the situations were scripted or participants were low on the restraint to avoid dispute factor of the MCPR scale, participants expressed willingness to interact with Black partners. When the situation was unscripted and participants were characterized by higher restraint scores, anticipated comfort varied as a function of automatically activated racial attitudes and the concern with acting prejudiced factor of the MCPR scale.

[1]  Michael A. Olson,et al.  Trait Inferences as a Function of Automatically Activated Racial Attitudes and Motivation to Control Prejudiced Reactions , 2004 .

[2]  Michael A. Olson,et al.  Implicit measures in social cognition. research: their meaning and use. , 2003, Annual review of psychology.

[3]  J. Dovidio,et al.  Implicit and Explicit Prejudice and Interracial Interaction , 2002 .

[4]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables. , 2002, Psychological methods.

[5]  R. Fazio,et al.  PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN Fazio, Hilden / EMOTIONAL REACTIONS TO A PREJUDICED RESPONSE Emotional Reactions to a Seemingly Prejudiced Response: The Role of Automatically Activated Racial Attitudes and Motivation to Control Prejudiced Reactions , 2001 .

[6]  R. Fazio,et al.  On the Origins of Racial Attitudes: Correlates of Childhood Experiences , 2001 .

[7]  James M. Olson,et al.  Accessible Attitudes as Tools for Object Appraisal: Their Costs and Benefits , 1999 .

[8]  R. Fazio,et al.  The MODE model of attitude-behavior processes. , 1999 .

[9]  A. Greenwald,et al.  Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  R. Fazio,et al.  Categorization by Race: The Impact of Automatic and Controlled Components of Racial Prejudice , 1997 .

[11]  J. Dovidio,et al.  On the nature of prejudice: Automatic and controlled processes , 1997 .

[12]  Russell H. Fazio,et al.  An Individual Difference Measure of Motivation to Control Prejudiced Reactions , 1997 .

[13]  Thomas F. Pettigrew,et al.  Generalized Intergroup Contact Effects on Prejudice , 1997 .

[14]  W. Ickes,et al.  Personality influences on the choice of situations , 1997 .

[15]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  The Flexible Correction Model: The Role of Naive Theories of Bias in Bias Correction , 1997 .

[16]  J. Bargh,et al.  Automaticity of social behavior: direct effects of trait construct and stereotype-activation on action. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  R. Fazio,et al.  Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: a bona fide pipeline? , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  M. Banaji,et al.  Implicit social cognition: attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. , 1995, Psychological review.

[19]  Curtis D. Hardin,et al.  Implicit Stereotyping in Person Judgment. , 1993 .

[20]  Monica Biernat,et al.  Categorization and Stereotyping: Effects of Group Context on Memory and Social Judgment , 1993 .

[21]  S. Maxwell,et al.  Bivariate median splits and spurious statistical significance. , 1993 .

[22]  D. Gilbert,et al.  The trouble of thinking: Activation and application of stereotypic beliefs. , 1991 .

[23]  M. Gurtman,et al.  Evidence for the automaticity of ageism , 1990 .

[24]  R. Darlington,et al.  Regression and Linear Models , 1990 .

[25]  R. Fazio.  Multiple Processes by which Attitudes Guide Behavior: The Mode Model as an Integrative Framework , 1990 .

[26]  P. Devine.  Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. , 1989 .

[27]  Irwin Katz,et al.  Racial ambivalence and American value conflict: Correlational and priming studies of dual cognitive structures. , 1988 .

[28]  Roger C. Schank,et al.  SCRIPTS, PLANS, GOALS, AND UNDERSTANDING , 1988 .

[29]  J. Dovidio,et al.  The aversive form of racism. , 1986 .

[30]  P. Glick.  Orientations toward relationships: Choosing a situation in which to begin a relationship ☆ , 1985 .

[31]  J. Pryor,et al.  The role of expertise in processing social interaction scripts , 1985 .

[32]  S. Gangestad,et al.  Choosing social situations: Two investigations of self-monitoring processes , 1982 .

[33]  R. Abelson.  Psychological status of the script concept. , 1981 .

[34]  C. Carver,et al.  Favorable evaluations of Blacks and the handicapped: Positive prejudice, unconscious denial, or social desirability? , 1978 .

[35]  J. Schofield.  Effect of norms, public disclosure, and need for approval on volunteering behavior consistent with attitudes. , 1975 .

[36]  D. Katz.  THE FUNCTIONAL APPROACH TO THE STUDY OF ATTITUDES , 1960 .

[37]  Jerome S. Bruner,et al.  Opinions and personality , 1957 .

[38]  Jerome S. Bruner,et al.  Opinions and Personality. , 1956 .