Enacting Assemblages of Technology: A Practice Lens Analysis

Given that ubiquitous computing environments are becoming integral to organizational processes in many industries, the integration of previously unconnected technologies is a worthwhile subject of study. However, there are few studies that investigate how organizations adopt assemblages of heterogeneous technologies across contexts. Recognizing that it is only when engaged by social actors that actual consequences of integrated technologies will occur, this paper explores how the increasing availability of information in multiple social and physical contexts may impact organizational practice. An interpretive multiple-case study of road transport organizations combining heterogeneous technologies is analyzed using a practice lens. The analysis of enactments of implemented technologies revealed both intended and unintended outcomes. Reflecting on the contradictory outcomes, the paper makes two contributions: 1) it conceptualizes organizational implications of the integration of embedded, mobile, and stationary technologies; 2) it extends the current understanding of how to study the interplay between agency, structure, and technology in sociotechnical assemblages.

[1]  Daniel Robey,et al.  Human agency in a wireless world: Patterns of technology use in nomadic computing environments , 2005, Inf. Organ..

[2]  BoudreauMarie-Claude,et al.  Enacting Integrated Information Technology , 2005 .

[3]  George Roussos,et al.  Ubiquitous and Pervasive Commerce , 2006 .

[4]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Research Commentary: The Next Wave of Nomadic Computing , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[5]  Ben Light,et al.  Unpacking user relations in an emerging ubiquitous computing environment: introducing the bystander , 2008, J. Inf. Technol..

[6]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Information Technology and the Structuring of Organizations , 2011 .

[7]  Mark Weiser,et al.  Some computer science issues in ubiquitous computing , 1993, CACM.

[8]  Susan V. Scott,et al.  10 Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization , 2008 .

[9]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[10]  Marie-Claude Boudreau,et al.  Enacting Integrated Information Technology: A Human Agency Perspective , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[11]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Improvising Organizational Transformation Over Time: A Situated Change Perspective , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[12]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Editorial: Social impacts of ubiquitous computing: Exploring critical interactions between mobility, context and technology , 2005 .

[13]  Jan Weglarz,et al.  Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations , 1993 .

[14]  Pamela Jordan.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques , 1994 .

[15]  Jung P. Shim,et al.  An exploratory study of radio frequency identification (RFID) adoption in the healthcare industry , 2007, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  Socio-Technical Studies of Mobility and Ubiquity , 2005, Designing Ubiquitous Information Environments.

[17]  Ojelanki K. Ngwenyama,et al.  Contextual influences on user satisfaction with mobile computing: findings from two healthcare organizations , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[18]  Carsten Sørensen,et al.  The dynamics of control and mobile computing in distributed activities , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[19]  Ulrika H. Westergren,et al.  Technologies for value creation: an exploration of remote diagnostics systems in the manufacturing industry , 2008, Information Systems Journal.

[20]  JoAnne Yates,et al.  Shaping Electronic Communication: The Metastructuring of Technology in the Context of Use , 1995 .

[21]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  A Practice Perspective on Technology-Mediated Network Relations: The Use of Internet-Based Self-Serve Technologies , 2004, Inf. Syst. Res..

[22]  Gregory D. Abowd,et al.  Charting past, present, and future research in ubiquitous computing , 2000, TCHI.

[23]  Daniel Robey,et al.  Theories that Explain Contradiction: Accounting for the Contradictory Organizational Consequences of Information Technology , 1995, ICIS.

[24]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Issues and Challenges in Ubiquitous Computing , 2002 .

[25]  Carsten Sørensen,et al.  Tales from the police: Rhythms of interaction with mobile technologies , 2005, Inf. Organ..

[26]  Rikard Lindgren,et al.  Multi-contextuality in ubiquitous computing: Investigating the car case through action research , 2005, Inf. Organ..

[27]  Rikard Lindgren,et al.  The Mobile–Stationary Divide in Ubiquitous Computing Environments: Lessons from the Transport Industry , 2005, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[28]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Social impacts of ubiquitous computing: Exploring critical interactions between mobility, context and technology: A Special Issue for Information and Organization , 2005, Inf. Organ..

[29]  Rikard Lindgren,et al.  Multi‐contextuality in boundary‐spanning practices , 2008, Inf. Syst. J..

[30]  George Roussos,et al.  Ubiquitous and Pervasive Commerce: New Frontiers for Electronic Business (Computer Communications and Networks) , 2005 .

[31]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  The role of standards in innovation and diffusion of broadband mobile services: The case of South Korea , 2005, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[32]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method , 1995 .

[33]  Jan Kietzmann,et al.  Interactive innovation of technology for mobile work , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[34]  Marie-Claude Boudreau,et al.  Accounting for the Contradictory Organizational Consequences of Information Technology: Theoretical Directions and Methodological Implications , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[35]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000, Theory in CSCW.