Four methods of measuring human corneal endothelial cells from specular photomicrographs.

We measured central corneal endothelial cell density and area from contact specular photomicrographs of ten normal and ten abnormal corneas, comparing the precision, cost, and speed of four methods: a rectangle, planimeter, digitizer, and cell sizer. The rectangle, planimeter, and digitizer gave results that differed less than 10% from each other; therefore, the three methods can be used interchangeably for clinical purposes. There are statistically significant differences among the three techniques that may be important in basic research. The cell sizer gave a rapid, less precise estimate of mean cell area and cell density. The planimeter and digitizer measured individual endothelial cell size, and the latter entered data directly into a computer that printed both a copy of the endothelial mosaic and a histogram of cell size frequency, and computed cell density and mean cell area. We make the following recommendations: Count cells in a rectangle used for routine clinical measurement. use a cell sizer for rough estimation, as in an eyebank setting. Use a computerized digitizer to study individual endothelial cell size.

[1]  R. Laing,et al.  The human corneal endothelium in keratoconus: A specular microscopic study. , 1979, Archives of ophthalmology.

[2]  J V Aquavella,et al.  The functional reserve of corneal endothelium. , 1978, Ophthalmology.

[3]  W M Bourne,et al.  Examination and Photography of donor corneal endothelium. , 1976, Archives of ophthalmology.

[4]  S. Waltman,et al.  Corneal endothelial changes with long-term topical epinephrine therapy. , 1977, Archives of ophthalmology.

[5]  H E Kaufman,et al.  Specular microscopy of human corneal endothelium in vivo. , 1976, American journal of ophthalmology.

[6]  J V Aquavella,et al.  Morphological appearance of the healing corneal endothelium. , 1978, Archives of ophthalmology.

[7]  K. Hoffer Vertical endothelial cell disparity. , 1979, American journal of ophthalmology.

[8]  R A Laing,et al.  In vivo photomicrography of the corneal endothelium. , 1975, Archives of ophthalmology.

[9]  R. E. Smith,et al.  Specular microscopy of epithelial downgrowth. , 1978, Archives of ophthalmology.

[10]  C. Hanna,et al.  Endothelial cell population changes of human cornea during life. , 1978, Archives of ophthalmology.

[11]  R A Laing,et al.  Changes in the corneal endothelium as a function of age. , 1976, Experimental eye research.

[12]  M. Galin,et al.  Endothelial cell loss from intraocular lens insertion. , 1978, Ophthalmology.

[13]  W. M. Bourne,et al.  Cataract extraction and the corneal endothelium. , 1976, American journal of ophthalmology.

[14]  H. Kaufman,et al.  The effect of intraocular lens implantation on the corneal endothelium. , 1977, Transactions. Section on Ophthalmology. American Academy of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology.

[15]  Irvine Ar,et al.  Endothelial damage with phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation. , 1978 .

[16]  Tsutomu Sato Studies on the endothelium of the corneal graft , 1978 .

[17]  B. Schimmelpfennig,et al.  Cornea guttata in donor material. , 1978, Archives of ophthalmology.

[18]  K. Setälä,et al.  ENDOTHELIAL CELLS IN CAPSULAR GLAUCOMA , 1977, Acta ophthalmologica.

[19]  R A Laing,et al.  Morphological changes in corneal endothelial cells after penetrating keratoplasty. , 1976, American journal of ophthalmology.

[20]  W. M. Bourne,et al.  The endothelium of clear corneal transplants. , 1976, Archives of ophthalmology.