Three-Point Likert Scales Are Good Enough
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Karl Pearson,et al. On the Probable Error of a Coefficient of Correlation as found from a Fourfold Table , 1913 .
[2] Clarence W. Brown,et al. Personnel and industrial psychology , 1949 .
[3] L. Cronbach. Further Evidence on Response Sets and Test Design , 1950 .
[4] W. R. Garner,et al. The amount of information in absolute judgments. , 1951 .
[5] L. Cronbach. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .
[6] A. W. Bendig. Reliability and the number of rating-scale categories. , 1954 .
[7] E. Ghiselli. The measurement of occupational aptitude. , 1955, Publications in psychology.
[8] D. Peabody,et al. Two components in bipolar scales: direction and extremeness. , 1962, Psychological review.
[9] S. Komorita,et al. ATTITUDE CONTENT, INTENSITY, AND THE NEUTRAL POINT ON A LIKERT SCALE. , 1963, The Journal of social psychology.
[10] S. S. Komorita,et al. Number of Scale Points and the Reliability of Scales , 1965 .
[11] Paul E. Green,et al. Rating Scales and Information Recovery—How Many Scales and Response Categories to Use? , 1970 .
[12] J. Jacoby,et al. Is There an Optimal Number of Alternatives for Likert Scale Items? Study I: Reliability and Validity , 1971 .
[13] R. Likert. “Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes, A” , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.