Deciding when to switch tasks in time-critical multitasking

While cognitive modeling has begun to make good progress in accounting for human multitasking behavior, current models typically focus on externally-driven task switching in laboratory-task settings. In contrast, many real-world complex tasks, particularly time-critical ones, involve internally-driven multitasking in which people themselves decide when to switch between tasks. In this paper, we propose an adaptation of the ACT-R cognitive architecture that incorporates a notion of elapsed time for the current goal and uses time to determine when to switch away from the current task. We demonstrate the usefulness of this mechanism in an application to a dynamic, time-critical dual search task, showing how an ACT-R model can account for various aspects of human subjects' multitasking behavior.

[1]  Frank J. Lee,et al.  Toward an ACT-R General Executive for Human Multitasking , 2004, ICCM.

[2]  W. Meck.  Functional and neural mechanisms of interval timing , 2003 .

[3]  T. Shallice,et al.  The cognitive and neuroanatomical correlates of multitasking , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  John R Anderson,et al.  An integrated theory of the mind. , 2004, Psychological review.

[5]  J. Driver,et al.  Control of Cognitive Processes: Attention and Performance XVIII , 2000 .

[6]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Attention : selection, awareness, and control : a tribute to Donald Broadbent , 1996 .

[7]  T. Shallice,et al.  Deficits in strategy application following frontal lobe damage in man. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[8]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Time Perception: Beyond Simple Interval Estimation , 2004, ICCM.

[9]  D E Kieras,et al.  A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. , 1997, Psychological review.

[10]  D. Kieras,et al.  Modern computational perspectives on executive mental processes and cognitive control: Where to from here? , 2000 .

[11]  Christian Gaser,et al.  Processing of temporal information and the basal ganglia: new evidence from fMRI , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  C. Lebiere,et al.  The Atomic Components of Thought , 1998 .

[13]  P W Burgess,et al.  Strategy application disorder: the role of the frontal lobes in human multitasking , 2000, Psychological research.

[14]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  Skills, rules, and knowledge; signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[15]  Tim Shallice,et al.  Supervisory control of action and thought selection. , 1993 .

[16]  J. Gregory Trafton,et al.  Memory for goals: an activation-based model , 2002, Cogn. Sci..

[17]  Richard B. Ivry,et al.  Cerebellar and basal ganglia contributions to interval timing , 2003 .

[18]  Richard Reviewer-Granger.  Unified Theories of Cognition , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  G. Hockey,et al.  Effects of time-pressure on decision-making under uncertainty: changes in affective state and information processing strategy. , 2000, Acta psychologica.