Radiosurgery for Arteriovenous Malformations Using Micro–Multi-leaf Collimators: Analyses of Outcome

Aim To assess the outcome of patients with AVMs treated using micro-MLC–based radiosurgery at Regional Cancer Centre (RCC), Thiruvananthapuram. Materials and Methods During January 1 to December 31, 2012, 24 patients were treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) at RCC. The median age was 28 years (range: 8–58 years). There were 11 males and 13 females. Fifteen patients had prior embolization. All patients were treated with a frameless radiosurgery system using micro-MLC–based linear accelerator (LINAC). Obliteration of the lesion was assessed with either magnetic resonance angiogram (MRA) or digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Results Nineteen patients who underwent an assessment procedure were evaluable for this study. At median follow-up of 12 months, nearly two-thirds of patients had complete obliteration of the AVM and the rest had partial obliteration. Among patients with complete obliteration, seven patients had an AVM volume of ≤ 3 cc and three-fourths of the patients had AVM score of   18 Gy resulted in higher obliteration. One patient had an episode of seizure after SRS. No complications or bleed was seen in any of the patients after treatment. Conclusion Our experience correlates with the existing literature reports, without any significant complications. Longer follow-up is required to assess the complete obliteration and late complications.

[1]  Stefan G Scheib,et al.  Quantifying the degree of conformity in radiosurgery treatment planning. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  J. Adler,et al.  Clinical outcome of radiosurgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformations. , 1992, Journal of neurosurgery.

[3]  H D Kubo,et al.  Impact of collimator leaf width on stereotactic radiosurgery and 3D conformal radiotherapy treatment plans. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  J. Flickinger,et al.  A proposed radiosurgery-based grading system for arteriovenous malformations. , 2002, Journal of neurosurgery.

[5]  Daniel Q. Sun,et al.  The radiosurgical treatment of arteriovenous malformations: obliteration, morbidities, and performance status. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  L D Lunsford,et al.  A dose-response analysis of arteriovenous malformation obliteration after radiosurgery. , 1996, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  F. Bova,et al.  Analysis of Factors Predictive of Success or Complications in Arteriovenous Malformation Radiosurgery , 2003, Neurosurgery.

[8]  D Lefkopoulos,et al.  Single-fraction stereotactic radiotherapy: a dose-response analysis of arteriovenous malformation obliteration. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  D. Kondziolka,et al.  A multi-institutional analysis of complication outcomes after arteriovenous malformation radiosurgery. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  G. Zadeh,et al.  Testing the radiosurgery-based arteriovenous malformation score and the modified Spetzler-Martin grading system to predict radiosurgical outcome. , 2005, Journal of neurosurgery.

[11]  F. Bova,et al.  Linear accelerator radiosurgery at the University of Florida. , 1992, Neurosurgery clinics of North America.

[12]  A L Boyer,et al.  A dosimetric comparison of fan-beam intensity modulated radiotherapy with Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery for treating intermediate intracranial lesions. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.