Insights from interval-valued ratings of consumer products—a DECSYS appraisal

The capture and analysis of interval-valued data has seen increased interest over recent years. This offers a direct means to capture and reason about uncertainty in data, whether obtained from sensors or from people. Open-source software (DECSYS [1]) was recently released to facilitate the efficient capture of interval-valued survey responses. Potential real-world applications are broad ranging, and this paper documents an initial test-case of the software and its underpinning methodology, in a marketing-centric application. It provides an illustration of the insights offered by interval-valued responses, in this case relating to consumer preferences. We apply two approaches to describe and draw insights from the data: inferential statistics and descriptive visualisation methods. Statistical results indicate that overall purchase intention was well-described by four factors: value, healthiness, taste and brand. The capture of uncertainty information, afforded by intervals, also permitted identification of six factors that contribute to purchase intention uncertainty— relating to taste, ethics and visual appearance. Visualisations of interval-valued responses, using the IAA [2]–[5], also highlighted factors with high degrees of uncertainty—in particular, product ethics. This information could prove valuable for retailers in determining how to focus future marketing campaigns. It may prove equally valuable for market regulators, by informing where to improve product labelling information. More generally, the case study provides an overview of capturing and analysing intervals, highlighting some of the challenges, but also the unique potential to gain additional insights not available using conventional, ‘crisp’, approaches.

[1]  Christian Wagner,et al.  Constructing General Type-2 fuzzy sets from interval-valued data , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems.

[2]  T. Næs,et al.  Analysing relations between specific and total liking scores , 2013 .

[3]  R. Likert “Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes, A” , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[4]  R. Wilken,et al.  The double benefits of consumer certainty: combining risk and range effects , 2015 .

[5]  Richard E Petty,et al.  Thought confidence as a determinant of persuasion: the self-validation hypothesis. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  Ulrich R. Orth,et al.  Dimensions of wine region equity and their impact on consumer preferences , 2005 .

[7]  Christian Wagner,et al.  DECSYS – Discrete and Ellipse-based response Capture SYStem , 2019, 2019 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE).

[8]  Christian Wagner,et al.  Similarity based applications for data-driven concept and word models based on type-1 and type-2 fuzzy sets , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE).

[9]  Mercedes Sánchez,et al.  Consumer Preferences for Wine Attributes in Different Retail Stores: A Conjoint Approach , 1998 .

[10]  M. Mazzocco,et al.  Consumer Preferences and Trade-Offs for Locally Grown and Genetically Modified Apples: A Conjoint Analysis Approach , 2008 .

[11]  Christian Wagner,et al.  Exploring how Component Factors and their Uncertainty Affect Judgements of Risk in Cyber-Security , 2019, CRITIS.

[12]  Sara R. Jaeger,et al.  The case for fruit quality: an interpretive review of consumer attitudes, and preferences for apples , 2003 .

[13]  Gregory Baker Consumer Preferences for Food Safety Attributes in Fresh Apples: Market Segments, Consumer Characteristics, and Marketing Opportunities , 1999 .

[14]  R. Aitken A Growing Edge of Measurement of Feelings [Abridged] , 1969 .

[15]  Richard E. Petty,et al.  Consumer conviction and commitment: An appraisal-based framework for attitude certainty , 2014 .

[16]  Mercedes Sánchez,et al.  Consumer preferences for wine attributes: a conjoint approach , 1997 .

[17]  Wonsuk Ko,et al.  Analysis of Consumer Preferences for Electric Vehicles , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[18]  Sara R. Jaeger,et al.  Consumer preferences for fresh and aged apples: a cross-cultural comparison , 1998 .

[19]  J. Barreiro-Hurlé,et al.  Is there a market for functional wines? Consumer preferences and willingness to pay for resveratrol-enriched red wine , 2008 .

[20]  Reinhard Madlener,et al.  Consumer Preferences for Alternative Fuel Vehicles: A Discrete Choice Analysis , 2012 .

[21]  Mark Ferguson,et al.  Size matters: How vehicle body type affects consumer preferences for electric vehicles , 2017 .

[22]  R. Aitken Measurement of feelings using visual analogue scales. , 1969, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[23]  Eric Molin,et al.  Consumer preferences for electric vehicles: a literature review , 2017 .

[24]  Steve Goodman,et al.  Consumer preferences of wine in Italy applying best‐worst scaling , 2009 .

[25]  Jill J. McCluskey,et al.  Assessing Consumer Preferences For Organic, Eco-Labeled, And Regular Apples , 2001 .

[26]  Christian Wagner,et al.  From Interval-Valued Data to General Type-2 Fuzzy Sets , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[27]  John D. Nelson,et al.  Exploring consumer preferences towards electric vehicles: The influence of consumer innovativeness , 2016 .

[28]  L. Monaco,et al.  Exploring environmental consciousness and consumer preferences for organic wines without sulfites , 2016 .

[29]  Jeremy J. Michalek,et al.  Will subsidies drive electric vehicle adoption? Measuring consumer preferences in the U.S. and China , 2015 .

[30]  Christian Wagner,et al.  On Comparing and Selecting Approaches to Model Interval-Valued Data as Fuzzy Sets , 2019, 2019 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE).

[31]  J. B. Brooke,et al.  SUS: A 'Quick and Dirty' Usability Scale , 1996 .

[32]  S. Denver,et al.  Consumer preferences for organically and locally produced apples , 2014 .