Spatial trends in leaf size of Amazonian rainforest trees

Abstract. Leaf size influences many aspects of tree function such as rates of transpiration and photosynthesis and, consequently, often varies in a predictable way in response to environmental gradients. The recent development of pan-Amazonian databases based on permanent botanical plots has now made it possible to assess trends in leaf size across environmental gradients in Amazonia. Previous plot-based studies have shown that the community structure of Amazonian trees breaks down into at least two major ecological gradients corresponding with variations in soil fertility (decreasing from southwest to northeast) and length of the dry season (increasing from northwest to south and east). Here we describe the geographic distribution of leaf size categories based on 121 plots distributed across eight South American countries. We find that the Amazon forest is predominantly populated by tree species and individuals in the mesophyll size class (20.25–182.25 cm2). The geographic distribution of species and individuals with large leaves (>20.25 cm2) is complex but is generally characterized by a higher proportion of such trees in the northwest of the region. Spatially corrected regressions reveal weak correlations between the proportion of large-leaved species and metrics of water availability. We also find a significant negative relationship between leaf size and wood density.

[1]  C. Raunkiær,et al.  The life forms of plants and statistical plant geography , 1934 .

[2]  P. Richards,et al.  The Tropical Rain Forest: An Ecological Study , 1953 .

[3]  W. H. Hodge,et al.  The Tropical Rain Forest: An Ecological Study , 1953 .

[4]  S. A. Cain,et al.  APPLICATION OF SOME PHYTOSOCIOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES TO BRAZILIAN RAIN FOREST , 1956 .

[5]  L. Webb,et al.  A Physiognomic Classification of Australian Rain Forests , 1959 .

[6]  T. C. Whitmore,et al.  A Comparison of Montane and Lowland Rain Forest in Ecuador I. The Forest Structure, Physiognomy, and Floristics , 1963 .

[7]  O. Loucks,et al.  Optimal leaf size in relation to environment , 1972 .

[8]  Thomas J. Givnish,et al.  Sizes and Shapes of Liane Leaves , 1976, The American Naturalist.

[9]  T. Givnish.  On the Adaptive Significance of Leaf Form , 1979 .

[10]  A. Juo,et al.  A SINGLE‐EXTRACTION METHOD USING SILVER‐THIOUREA FOR MEASURING EXCHANGEABLE CATIONS AND EFFECTIVE CEC IN SOILS WITH VARIABLE CHARGES , 1980 .

[11]  G. E. Dolph,et al.  Variation in Leaf Size with Respect to Climate in the Tropics of the Western Hemisphere , 1980 .

[12]  R. Dawkins.  The Extended Phenotype , 1982 .

[13]  T. Givnish.  Leaf and Canopy Adaptations in Tropical Forests , 1984 .

[14]  Josefina Barajas-Morales.  Wood Specific Gravity in Species from Two Tropical Forests in Mexico , 1987 .

[15]  Jill Thompson,et al.  Ecological studies on a lowland evergreen rain forest on Maraca Island, Roraima, Brazil I. Physical environment, forest structure and leaf chemistry , 1992 .

[16]  P. Legendre.  Spatial Autocorrelation: Trouble or New Paradigm? , 1993 .

[17]  P. Clifford,et al.  Modifying the t test for assessing the correlation between two spatial processes , 1993 .

[18]  V. Kapos,et al.  Floristics and biogeography of a rain forest in the Venezuelan Andes , 1994 .

[19]  A. Gillison,et al.  A generic plant functional attribute set and grammar for dynamic vegetation description and analysis. , 1995 .

[20]  D. Ackerly.  Canopy Structure and Dynamics: Integration of Growth Processes in Tropical Pioneer Trees , 1996 .

[21]  Rodolfo Vásquez Martínez,et al.  Florula de las Reservas Biologicas de Iquitos, Peru. , 1998 .

[22]  M. Donoghue,et al.  Leaf Size, Sapling Allometry, and Corner's Rules: Phylogeny and Correlated Evolution in Maples (Acer) , 1998, The American Naturalist.

[23]  P. Reich,et al.  Convergence and correlations among leaf size and function in seed plants: a comparative test using independent contrasts. , 1999, American journal of botany.

[24]  J. Cornelissen.  A triangular relationship between leaf size and seed size among woody species: allometry, ontogeny, ecology and taxonomy , 1999, Oecologia.

[25]  M. Westoby,et al.  Do small leaves expand faster than large leaves, and do shorter expansion times reduce herbivore damage? , 2000 .

[26]  D. S. Hammond,et al.  CHARACTER CONVERGENCE, DIVERSITY, AND DISTURBANCE IN TROPICAL RAIN FOREST IN GUYANA , 2001 .

[27]  G. B. Williamson,et al.  Geographic Variation in Wood Specific Gravity: Effects of Latitude, Temperature, and Precipitation , 2002 .

[28]  R. Hendrick.  The Ecology of Trees in the Tropical Rain Forest , 2002 .

[29]  M. Westoby,et al.  ECOLOGICAL STRATEGIES : Some Leading Dimensions of Variation Between Species , 2002 .

[30]  O. Phillips,et al.  An international network to monitor the structure, composition and dynamics of Amazonian forests (RAINFOR) , 2002 .

[31]  Daniel S. Falster,et al.  Leaf size and angle vary widely across species: what consequences for light interception? , 2003, The New phytologist.

[32]  M. Westoby,et al.  Leaf-size divergence along rainfall and soil-nutrient gradients: Is the method of size reduction common among clades? , 2003 .

[33]  S L Lewis,et al.  Pattern and process in Amazon tree turnover, 1976-2001. , 2004, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[34]  A. Di Fiore,et al.  Variation in wood density determines spatial patterns inAmazonian forest biomass , 2004 .

[35]  W. Bond,et al.  Leaf size and inflorescence size may be allometrically related traits , 1989, Oecologia.

[36]  David D. Ackerly,et al.  FUNCTIONAL STRATEGIES OF CHAPARRAL SHRUBS IN RELATION TO SEASONAL WATER DEFICIT AND DISTURBANCE , 2004 .

[37]  J. Terborgh,et al.  The above‐ground coarse wood productivity of 104 Neotropical forest plots , 2004 .

[38]  Daniel Sabatier,et al.  A spatial model of tree α-diversity and tree density for the Amazon , 2003, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[39]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  Regional and phylogenetic variation of wood density across 2456 Neotropical tree species. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[40]  Thiago F. Rangel,et al.  Towards an integrated computational tool for spatial analysis in macroecology and biogeography , 2006 .

[41]  O. Phillips,et al.  Continental-scale patterns of canopy tree composition and function across Amazonia , 2006, Nature.

[42]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  Relationships among ecologically important dimensions of plant trait variation in seven neotropical forests. , 2007, Annals of botany.

[43]  Y. Shimabukuro,et al.  Spatial patterns and fire response of recent Amazonian droughts , 2007 .

[44]  O. Phillips,et al.  The RAINFOR database: monitoring forest biomass and dynamics , 2007 .

[45]  G. Farquhar,et al.  Effects of rising temperatures and [CO2] on the physiology of tropical forest trees , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[46]  Piero G. Delprete,et al.  Flórula de las Reservas Biológicas de Iquitos, Perú , 2008, Brittonia.

[47]  Thomas J. Givnish,et al.  COMPARATIVE STUDIES OF LEAF FORM: ASSESSING THE RELATIVE ROLES OF SELECTIVE PRESSURES AND PHYLOGENETIC CONSTRAINTS , 2008 .

[48]  A. Arneth,et al.  Chemical and physical properties of Amazon forest soils in relation to their genesis , 2009 .

[49]  William F. Laurance,et al.  Spatial distribution and functional significance of leaf lamina shape in Amazonian forest trees , 2009 .

[50]  J. Terborgh,et al.  Drought Sensitivity of the Amazon Rainforest , 2009, Science.