Exploring effective micro-level items for evaluating inclusive walking facilities on urban streets (applied in Johor Bahru, Malaysia)

Abstract Modern cities try to provide enough facilities for inclusive and pedestrian-friendly streets. Evaluating and designing models that consider a wide range of street users, including disabled people, can help urban planners to design these inclusive streets. The results of existing (but limited) studies evaluating street conditions for pedestrians do not include a wide range of street users. Therefore, this paper seeks to propose a new model for evaluating and improving urban streets, focusing on inclusive pedestrian facilities. This study introduces pedestrian mobility indicators using advanced design guidelines, existing literature and expert interviews. These indicators are evaluated by exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to find underlying patterns. Levels of association between observed and latent variables are tested by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and second-order confirmatory factor analysis (SOCFA). Structural equation modelling (SEM) is used to perform the CFA and SOCFA analyses. A questionnaire was used to collect data from 599 participants randomly selected from Setia Tropika residents (Johor, Malaysia). The resultant factor loading values are used as weights in an analytical points-based system, comparing existing facilities to a standard to estimate street facilities and infrastructure levels of service for pedestrians. This pedestrian level of service (PLOS) can be applied to various urban streets around the world, but in this study a street in Malaysia is evaluated using this method to check the accuracy of the proposed PLOS model. Existing street problems and potential improvements can be identified by this model.

[1]  J. Sallis,et al.  Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: Findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures , 2003, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[2]  Greet Cardon,et al.  Assessing the environmental characteristics of cycling routes to school: a study on the reliability and validity of a Google Street View-based audit , 2014, International Journal of Health Geographics.

[3]  Ann Forsyth,et al.  Relation of modifiable neighborhood attributes to walking. , 2008, Preventive medicine.

[4]  W. van Mechelen,et al.  Determinants of Activity-Friendly Neighborhoods for Children: Results from the Space Study , 2007, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[5]  Mehdi Moeinaddini,et al.  Non-motorised Level of Service: Addressing Challenges in Pedestrian and Bicycle Level of Service , 2013 .

[6]  James F Sallis,et al.  Reliability between online raters with varying familiarities of a region: Microscale Audit of Pedestrian Streetscapes (MAPS). , 2017, Landscape and urban planning.

[7]  Mehdi Moeinaddini,et al.  Analysing the Relationship Between Park-and-Ride Facilities and Private Motorised Trips Indicators , 2014 .

[8]  Mehdi Moeinaddini,et al.  An urban mobility index for evaluating and reducing private motorized trips , 2015 .

[9]  Wei Wang,et al.  Research on Methods of Assessing Pedestrian Level of Service for Sidewalk , 2007 .

[10]  John R Bethlehem,et al.  The SPOTLIGHT virtual audit tool: a valid and reliable tool to assess obesogenic characteristics of the built environment , 2014, International Journal of Health Geographics.

[11]  Vikas Mehta,et al.  Walkable streets: pedestrian behavior, perceptions and attitudes , 2008 .

[12]  K Lautso,et al.  A STUDY OF PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC IN HELSINKI: METHODS AND RESULTS , 1974 .

[13]  James F. Sallis,et al.  Online versus in-person comparison of Microscale Audit of Pedestrian Streetscapes (MAPS) assessments: reliability of alternate methods , 2017, International Journal of Health Geographics.

[14]  Mahdi Aghaabbasi,et al.  A new assessment model to evaluate the microscale sidewalk design factors at the neighbourhood level , 2017 .

[15]  Mehdi Moeinaddini,et al.  Disabled Pedestrian Level of Service Method for Evaluating and Promoting Inclusive Walking Facilities on Urban Streets , 2013 .

[16]  Bruce W Landis,et al.  Modeling the Roadside Walking Environment: Pedestrian Level of Service , 2001 .

[17]  John J. Fruin,et al.  Pedestrian planning and design , 1971 .

[18]  Sally Jensen,et al.  Pedestrian and Bicyclist Level of Service on Roadway Segments , 2007 .

[19]  Mehdi Moeinaddini,et al.  A pedestrian level of service method for evaluating and promoting walking facilities on campus streets , 2014 .

[20]  Seiichi Kagaya,et al.  METHOD TO DETERMINE PEDESTRIAN LEVEL-OF-SERVICE FOR CROSSWALKS AT URBAN INTERSECTIONS , 2005 .

[21]  Mahdi Aghaabbasi,et al.  Evaluating the capability of walkability audit tools for assessing sidewalks , 2018 .

[22]  J. Lapidus,et al.  Developing a reliable Senior Walking Environmental Assessment Tool. , 2005, American journal of preventive medicine.

[23]  Mehdi Moeinaddini,et al.  The relationship between urban street networks and the number of transport fatalities at the city level , 2014 .

[24]  Pedestrian Transportation Program.  Portland pedestrian design guide , 1998 .

[25]  Kristian Larsen,et al.  Safety and School Travel: How Does the Built Environment Relate to Correlates of Safety, Mode of Travel and Physical Activity Levels to and from School , 2015 .

[26]  Praveen Maghelal,et al.  Walkability: A Review of Existing Pedestrian Indices , 2011 .

[27]  M. Southworth.  Designing the Walkable City , 2005 .

[28]  Mehdi Moeinaddini,et al.  A Bicycle Safety Index for Evaluating Urban Street Facilities , 2015, Traffic injury prevention.

[29]  Stephen J Mooney,et al.  Development and deployment of the Computer Assisted Neighborhood Visual Assessment System (CANVAS) to measure health-related neighborhood conditions. , 2015, Health & place.

[30]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research , 2014 .

[31]  Gabriel Holbrow.  Sidewalk Accessibility, Sidewalk Justice Conceptions of Equity in Cities' Prioritization of Pedestrian Accessibility Improvements , 2013 .

[32]  Mahdi Aghaabbasi,et al.  Addressing issues in the use of Google tools for assessing pedestrian built environments , 2018, Journal of Transport Geography.

[33]  Yoram Shiftan,et al.  The influence of individual's risk perception and attitudes on travel behavior , 2012 .

[34]  Daniel A. Rodriguez,et al.  The development and testing of an audit for the pedestrian environment , 2007 .

[35]  Ebru Cubukcu.  Walking for Sustainable Living , 2013 .

[36]  Che Ros Ismail,et al.  A practical method for evaluating parking area level of service , 2013 .

[37]  Tommy Gärling,et al.  Satisfaction with travel and subjective well-being: Development and test of a measurement tool , 2011 .

[38]  Andy P. Jones,et al.  Assessing environmental features related to mental health: a reliability study of visual streetscape images , 2014, BMC Public Health.

[39]  Jeffrey S. Wilson,et al.  Using Google Street View to Audit the Built Environment: Inter-rater Reliability Results , 2013, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[40]  P. Vedagiri,et al.  Evaluation of pedestrian crosswalk level of service (LOS) in perspective of type of land-use , 2015 .

[41]  Andy P. Jones,et al.  Developing and testing a street audit tool using Google Street View to measure environmental supportiveness for physical activity , 2013, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.

[42]  Y Tanaboriboon,et al.  Level-of-service standards for pedestrian facilities in bangkok: a case study , 1989 .

[43]  John S Miller,et al.  Calibrating Pedestrian Level-of-Service Metrics with 3-D Visualization , 2000 .

[44]  Linda B. Dixon.  Bicycle and Pedestrian Level-of-Service Performance Measures and Standards for Congestion Management Systems , 1996 .

[45]  K. Kirtland,et al.  Development and Use of a Tool for Assessing Sidewalk Maintenance as an Environmental Support of Physical Activity , 2005, Health promotion practice.

[46]  Prasanta Kumar Bhuyan,et al.  Pedestrian level of service criteria for urban off-street facilities in mid-sized cities , 2014 .

[47]  Noreen C McDonald,et al.  Active transportation to school: trends among U.S. schoolchildren, 1969-2001. , 2007, American journal of preventive medicine.

[48]  Theodore Anton Petritsch,et al.  Pedestrian Level-of-Service Model for Urban Arterial Facilities With Sidewalks , 2006 .

[49]  Mehdi Moeinaddini,et al.  Analyzing the relationships between the number of deaths in road accidents and the work travel mode choice at the city level , 2015 .

[50]  Reid Ewing,et al.  Identifying and Measuring Urban Design Qualities Related to Walkability. , 2006, Journal of physical activity & health.

[51]  Sheila Sarkar.  DETERMINATION OF SERVICE LEVELS FOR PEDESTRIANS, WITH EUROPEAN EXAMPLES , 1993 .

[52]  P. Vedagiri,et al.  Review of Pedestrian Level of Service: Perspective in Developing Countries , 2016 .

[53]  Mehdi Moeinaddini,et al.  Pedestrian safety index for evaluating street facilities in urban areas , 2015 .

[54]  Sheila Sarkar,et al.  QUALITATIVE EVALUATION OF COMFORT NEEDS IN URBAN WALKWAYS IN MAJOR ACTIVITY CENTERS , 2003 .

[55]  C. J. Khisty.  EVALUATION OF PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES: BEYOND THE LEVEL-OF-SERVICE CONCEPT , 1994 .

[56]  Magdalini Pitsiava-Latinopoulou,et al.  Development of a Model for the Estimation of Pedestrian Level of Service in Greek Urban Areas , 2012 .