On utrocular discrimination

Observers with good stereoacuity judged which eye received sine-wave grating patterns in a two-category forced-choice procedure. Large individual differences were found, but for most observers reliable discrimination was achieved at low spatial frequencies. No observer could perform the task above chance levels at high spatial frequencies. Discrimination was unaffected by retinal location, grating orientation, grating contrast, stimulus duration, or practice with feedback. Among observers who could perform the task, the following results were obtained: (1) Introduction of high spatial frequency components did not interfere with performance so long as a low spatial frequency component was present. (2) When gratings of low equal spatial frequency were presented to both eyes simultaneously at different contrast levels, observers could identify which eye received the higher contrast. (3) At low spatial frequencies, observers could distinguish monocular from binocular presentation. (4) Temporal frequency variations (counterphase flicker) influenced performance for some observers. Binocular summation and interocular transfer were unaffected by the spatial frequency variations which modulate utrocular discrimination. A new procedure for measuring stereopsis was developed which made possible comparison of utrocular discrimination with stereopsis at specific spatial frequencies. Stereopsis appeared mildly affected by spatial frequency.

[1]  R. Hess.  Interocular Transfer in Individuals with Strabismic Amblyopia; A Cautionary Note , 1978, Perception.

[2]  O. Schade.  Optical and photoelectric analog of the eye. , 1956, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[3]  C. Blakemore,et al.  The neural mechanism of binocular depth discrimination , 1967, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  B Julesz,et al.  Masking in Visual Recognition: Effects of Two-Dimensional Filtered Noise , 1973, Science.

[5]  Campbell Fw,et al.  The appearance of gratings with and without the fundamental Fourier component. , 1971 .

[6]  C Ware,et al.  Interocular transfer of a visual after‐effect in normal and stereoblind humans , 1974, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  R. Gregory.  Eye and Brain: The Psychology of Seeing , 1969 .

[8]  H. Hirsch,et al.  Deficits in binocular depth perception in cats after alternating monocular deprivation , 1975, Science.

[9]  Utrocular, or 'which eye,' discrimination. , 1945 .

[10]  J A Movshon,et al.  Interocular Transfer in Normal Humans, and Those Who Lack Stereopsis , 1972, Perception.

[11]  K. N. Ogle.  Researches in binocular vision. , 1950 .

[12]  G. Brindley.  Physiology of the Retina and the Visual Pathway , 1960 .

[13]  C. Blakemore,et al.  A new kind of stereoscopic vision. , 1970, Vision research.

[14]  H Goldmann,et al.  The ability to distinguish which eye was stimulated by light. , 1969, Investigative ophthalmology.

[15]  J. Stone,et al.  Loss of a specific cell type from dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus in visually deprived cats. , 1972, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  D. Rose.  Monocular versus Binocular Contrast Thresholds for Movement and Pattern , 1978, Perception.

[17]  R. Blake,et al.  Binocular summation in normal and stereoblind humans , 1977, Vision Research.

[18]  G V Barrett,et al.  Judging with Which Eye One is Viewing a Three-Dimensional Scene , 1965, Perceptual and motor skills.

[19]  Chance Results in Utrocular Discrimination , 1968, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[20]  C Ware,et al.  On interocular transfer of various visual aftereffects in normal and stereoblind observers. , 1974, Vision research.

[21]  D. H. Kelly.  Effects of Sharp Edges on the Visibility of Sinusoidal Gratings , 1970 .

[22]  D. W. Watkins,et al.  Grating visibility as a function of orientation and retinal eccentricity , 1975, Vision Research.

[23]  M. Pickersgill.  On knowing with which eye one is seeing , 1961 .

[24]  L Maffei,et al.  Binocular depth perception without geometrical cues. , 1971, Vision research.

[25]  D. Tolhurst,et al.  Psychophysical evidence for sustained and transient detectors in human vision , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[26]  Robert Fox,et al.  The psychophysical inquiry into binocular summation , 1973 .

[27]  G. Legge.  Sustained and transient mechanisms in human vision: Temporal and spatial properties , 1978, Vision Research.

[28]  N J Wade,et al.  On Interocular Transfer of the Movement Aftereffect in Individuals with and without Normal Binocular Vision , 1976, Perception.

[29]  D. G. Green,et al.  Monocular versus Binocular Visual Acuity , 1965, Nature.

[30]  B. Julesz,et al.  Spatial-frequency masking in vision: critical bands and spread of masking. , 1972, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[31]  R. Blake,et al.  Psychophysical evidence for a monocular visual cortex in stereoblind humans. , 1979, Science.

[32]  N J Wade,et al.  Monocular and Binocular Rivalry between Contours , 1975, Perception.

[33]  B. Gordon,et al.  Stereopsis in normal domestic cat, Siamese cat, and cat raised with alternating monocular occlusion. , 1975, Journal of neurophysiology.