Weak‐acid preservatives: modelling microbial inhibition and response

Weak‐acid preservatives are widely used to prevent microbial spoilage of acidic foods and beverages. Characteristically, weak‐acid preservatives do not kill micro‐organisms but inhibit growth, causing very extended lag phases. Preservatives are more effective at low pH values where solutions contain increased concentrations of undissociated acids. Inhibition by weak‐acids involves rapid diffusion of undissociated molecules through the plasma membrane; dissociation of these molecules within cells liberates protons, thus acidifying the cytoplasm and preventing growth. By modelling preservative action in yeast, using a thermodynamic and kinetic approach, it was possible to demonstrate that: (i) inhibition depends more on the degree to which individual preservatives are concentrated within cells, rather than on undissociated acid concentration per se; (ii) it is entirely feasible for microbes to pump protons out of the cell during extended lag phase and raise internal pH (pHi), despite further influx of preservatives; (iii) the duration of the lag phase can be predicted from the model, using a Gaussian fit of proton‐pumping H+‐ATPase activity against pHi; (iv) theoretical ATP consumption for proton pumping can be directly correlated with the reduction in cell yield observed in glucose‐limited cultures.

[1]  G. Edwards,et al.  Antimicrobial Food Additives , 1980 .

[2]  M. Loureiro-Dias,et al.  Resistance of food spoilage yeasts to sorbic acid , 1994 .

[3]  M. Stratford,et al.  Comparison of the inhibitory action on Saccharomyces cerevisiae of weak-acid preservatives, uncouplers, and medium-chain fatty acids. , 1996, FEMS microbiology letters.

[4]  C. Sheu,et al.  Function of Lipophilic Acids as Antimicrobial Food Additives , 1973, Nature.

[5]  A. Sols,et al.  Studies on the mechanism of the antifungal action of benzoate. , 1983, The Biochemical journal.

[6]  M. Ingram Studies on benzoate-resistant yeasts. , 1960, Acta microbiologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae.

[7]  J. Thevelein Signal transduction in yeast , 1994, Yeast.

[8]  T. Imai,et al.  Measurement of yeast intracellular pH by image processing and the change it undergoes during growth phase. , 1995, Journal of biotechnology.

[9]  B. Macris Mechanism of benzoic acid uptake by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1975, Applied microbiology.

[10]  R. Serrano,et al.  Physiology of mutants with reduced expression of plasma membrane H+‐ATPase , 1989, Yeast.

[11]  T. A. Krulwich,et al.  Buffering capacity of bacilli that grow at different pH ranges , 1985, Journal of bacteriology.

[12]  G. Willsky Characterization of the plasma membrane Mg2+-ATPase from the yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1979, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[13]  M. Stratford,et al.  Evidence that sorbic acid does not inhibit yeast as a classic ‘weak acid preservative’ , 1998, Letters in applied microbiology.

[14]  H. Sadoff,et al.  INHIBITION OF ALCOHOLIC FERMENTATION BY SORBIC ACID , 1961, Journal of bacteriology.

[15]  J. Smelt,et al.  Growth and toxin formation by Clostridium botulinum at low pH values. , 1982, The Journal of applied bacteriology.

[16]  M. Stratford,et al.  Transport of Sulphur Dioxide by Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1986 .

[17]  M. B. Cole,et al.  Effects of weak acids and external pH on the intracellular pH of Zygosaccharomyces bailii, and its implications in weak‐acid resistance , 1987 .

[18]  P. Morgan,et al.  Sulphur dioxide resistance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomycodes ludwigii , 1987 .

[19]  A. D. Warth Effect of Benzoic Acid on Growth Yield of Yeasts Differing in Their Resistance to Preservatives , 1988, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[20]  C. Gancedo,et al.  Activation of yeast plasma membrane ATPase by acid pH during growth , 1987, FEBS letters.