Application of an autoregressive process to estimate genetic parameters and breeding values for daily milk yield in a tropical herd of Lucerna cattle and in United States Holstein herds.

The objectives of this study were to estimate from test day records the genetic and environmental (co)variance components, correlations, and breeding values to increase genetic gain in milk yield of Lucerna and US Holstein cattle. The effects of repeated observations (within cow) were explained by first-order autoregressive processes within and across lactations using an animal model. Estimates of variance components and correlation coefficients between test days were obtained using derivative-free REML methodology. The autoregressive structure significantly reduced the model error component by disentangling the short-term environmental effects. The additional information and the more heterogeneous environmental variances between lactations in the multiple-lactation test day model than in the first lactation model provided substantially larger estimates of additive genetic variance (0.62 kg2 for Lucerna; 14.73 kg2 for Holstein), heritability (0.13 for Lucerna; 0.42 for Holstein), and individual genetic merit. Rank correlations of breeding values from multiple lactations and from first lactations ranged from 0.18 to 0.37 for females and from 0.73 to 0.89 for males, respectively. Consequently, more selection errors and less genetic gain would be expected from selection decisions based on an analysis of first lactation only, and greater accuracy would be achieved from multiple lactations. Results indicated that substantial genetic gain was possible for milk yield in the Lucerna herd (34 kg/yr). Estimates of genetic variance for Holsteins were larger than previously reported, which portends more rapid genetic progress in US herds also; under our assumptions, increases would be from 173 to 197 kg/yr.

[1]  D G Fox,et al.  Economic comparison of nutritional management strategies for Venezuelan dual-purpose cattle systems. , 1994, Journal of animal science.

[2]  John A. Nelder,et al.  A Simplex Method for Function Minimization , 1965, Comput. J..

[3]  G. Casella,et al.  Statistical Inference , 2003, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[4]  R. Blake,et al.  Effects of age, parity, season of calving, and sire on milk yield of Carora cows in Venezuela. , 1989, Journal of dairy science.

[5]  I. D. Boer,et al.  Prediction of additive and dominance effects in (un)selected populations with inbreeding. , 1992 .

[6]  Relating progeny superiority to genetic trend in cattle. , 1969, Journal of animal science.

[7]  W. E. Vinson,et al.  Prediction of Daughter's Performance from Dam's Cow Index Adjusted for Within-Herd Variance , 1988 .

[8]  W. Thorpe,et al.  Sources of genetic variation for milk production in a crossbred herd in the tropics , 1996 .

[9]  R. Everett,et al.  A multiplicative mixed model when the variances are heterogeneous , 1993 .

[10]  P. VanRaden,et al.  Expansion of projected lactation yield to stabilize genetic variance. , 1991, Journal of dairy science.

[11]  A. E. Freeman,et al.  Adjustment for heterogeneity of variances by herd production level in dairy cow and sire evaluation , 1990 .

[12]  H. Swalve,et al.  Modelling of the lactation curve as a sub-model in the evaluation of test day records , 1995 .

[13]  L D Van Vleck,et al.  Derivative-free restricted maximum likelihood estimation in animal models with a sparse matrix solver. , 1991, Journal of dairy science.

[14]  G. Wiggans,et al.  Estimation of genetic parameters for milk and fat yields of dairy cattle in Spain and the United States. , 1989, Journal of dairy science.

[15]  L. D. Vleck,et al.  Factors Affecting Performance of Holsteins in Subtropical Regions of Mexico , 1976 .

[16]  L. D. Vleck,et al.  Genetic parameters for first lactation milk yields at three levels of herd production. , 1987 .

[17]  L R Jones,et al.  Estimating milk, fat, and protein lactation curves with a test day model. , 1992, Journal of dairy science.

[18]  L. D. Van Vleck,et al.  Genotype by environment interaction for Holstein milk yield in Colombia, Mexico, and Puerto Rico. , 1991, Journal of dairy science.

[19]  David R. Lee,et al.  Livestock, Deforestation, and Policy Making: Intensification of Cattle Production Systems in Central America Revisited , 1995 .

[20]  I. L. Mao,et al.  Heterogeneity of (Co)Variance and Heritabitity in Different Levels of Intraherd Milk Production Variance and of Herd Average , 1990 .

[21]  K. Wade,et al.  Solutions to a System of Equations Involving a First-Order Autoregressive Process , 1993 .

[22]  S. P. Smith,et al.  Estimating Variance Components in a Class of Mixed Models by Restricted Maximum Likelihood , 1986 .

[23]  L. D. Vleck,et al.  Genetics for the Animal Sciences , 1987 .

[24]  Robert H. Shumway,et al.  Modeling Daily Milk Yield in Holstein Cows Using Time Series Analysis , 1990 .

[25]  B. Kennedy,et al.  Genetic parameters of purebred and crossbred Milking Criollos in tropical Mexico , 1994 .

[26]  B. Engel,et al.  Joint Estimation of Breeding Values and Heterogeneous Variances of Large Data Files , 1996 .

[27]  P. VanRaden,et al.  Method and effect of adjustment for heterogeneous variance. , 1991, Journal of dairy science.

[28]  L. D. Vleck,et al.  Estimates of Genetic Selection Differentials and Generation Intervals for Four Paths of Selection , 1991 .

[29]  K. Meyer,et al.  Estimates of genetic parameters for first lactation test day production of Australian black and white cows , 1989 .

[30]  L. D. Vleck,et al.  Heterogeneous within-herd variance. 1. Genetic parameters for first and second lactation milk yields of grade Holstein cows. , 1990 .