Performance evaluation of lean manufacturing implementation in Brazil

Purpose - – Manufacturing companies worldwide have been replacing traditional mass-production practices by lean initiatives. This translation process is progressive and may vary depending on several factors. Hence, it could be expected that the degree of adoption of the lean practices could vary significantly among industries, regions and even countries. The purpose of this paper is to explore the implementation performance of lean principles in Brazil, the paper developed a survey in the Sao Paulo Metropolitan Area, which considered 51 industries of different sizes, from several industrial segments, nationals and multinationals. Design/methodology/approach - – The proposed survey was developed using as a normative framework the SAE J4000 standard – identification and measurement of the best practice in implementation of lean operation and the SAE J4001 – implementation of lean operation user manual. To measure the implementation degree of the lean practices in the researched industries, the paper proposed the utilization of two concepts: the degree of leanness (DOL) of an element of J4000 and DOL of a company. Also three hypotheses were tested, trying to establish the relationship among the DOL and firm ownership, their size and respective industrial sector. Findings - – The results obtained in the survey demonstrated that the performance of lean initiative implementation is not uniform among the companies located in the researched area. Outcomes also showed that the degree of implementation of the lean practices by multinational companies was higher than that for the national firms. However, it was not possible to establish a relationship between the DOL and the size of the firms. Neither a clear and definite association between DOL and industrial sector was possible to be identified. Practical implications - – For the practitioners and managers dealing with the lean implementation, this paper gives a relevant contribution because it shows how they can effectively use an existing tool to measure the implementation of the lean practices in their respective firms. Furthermore, the DOL calculation for each individual element of the J4000 standard could also be used by practitioners and managers to identify specific problems and opportunity areas where practical actions could be identified to improve the lean implementation. Originality/value - – This paper contributes to the lean manufacturing theory because it proposes a theoretical way to measure the degree of implementation of the lean initiatives in the manufacturing companies. Also the survey results generate additional research material that could be used by other researchers to further explore the subject in the area.

[1]  Sanjay Bhasin,et al.  An appropriate change strategy for lean success , 2012 .

[2]  Lawrence M. Corbett.  Lean Six Sigma: the contribution to business excellence , 2011 .

[3]  Seyed Mohammad,et al.  A proposed dynamic model for a lean roadmap , 2011 .

[5]  R. Calantone,et al.  Assessing the impact of environmental management systems on corporate and environmental performance , 2003 .

[6]  S. K. Sharma,et al.  Lean can be a survival strategy during recessionary times , 2009 .

[7]  Luciano Barin Cruz,et al.  Corporate social responsibility and green management , 2009 .

[8]  Nick Rich,et al.  Lean transformation in the pure service environment: the case of the call service centre , 2009 .

[9]  Patrick Godfrey,et al.  The development of a lean resource mapping framework: Introducing an 8th waste , 2012 .

[10]  Ahad Ali,et al.  Survey‐based spreadsheet model on lean implementation , 2010 .

[11]  Venkat Allada,et al.  Application of mahalanobis distance as a lean assessment metric , 2006 .

[12]  Gunnar Stefansson,et al.  Applying a lean approach to identify waste in motor carrier operations , 2012 .

[13]  Trevor A Spedding,et al.  The evolution of lean Six Sigma , 2010 .

[14]  J. Worley,et al.  The role of communication and management support in a lean manufacturing implementation , 2006 .

[15]  Sanjay Bhasin,et al.  Prominent obstacles to lean , 2012 .

[16]  K. Jeyaraman,et al.  A conceptual framework for critical success factors of lean Six Sigma , 2010 .

[17]  Sanjay Bhasin,et al.  Performance of Lean in large organisations , 2012 .

[18]  Cipriano Forza,et al.  Survey research in operations management: a process‐based perspective , 2002 .

[19]  D. Lambert,et al.  Supplier relationship management as a macro business process , 2012 .

[20]  Jan Stentoft Arlbjørn,et al.  Evidence of lean: a review of international peer‐reviewed journal articles , 2013 .

[21]  Ruth Boaden,et al.  Developing an understanding of corporate anorexia , 2004 .

[22]  Paul Forrester,et al.  A model for evaluating the degree of leanness of manufacturing firms , 2002 .

[23]  Arauacute jo Calarge Felipe,et al.  Evaluation of Lean Production System by using SAE J4000 standard: Case study in Brazilian and Spanish automotive component manufacturing organizations , 2012 .

[24]  C. Dancey,et al.  Statistics Without Maths For Psychology , 1999 .

[25]  Moacir Godinho Filho,et al.  Manufatura enxuta: Uma revisao que classifica e analisa os trabalhos apontando perspectivas de pesquisas futuras , 2004 .

[26]  Sanjay Bhasin.  Measuring the Leanness of an organisation , 2011 .

[27]  Cathleen Benko,et al.  Metamorphosis in the auto industry , 2003 .

[28]  Kyle B. Stone.  Four decades of lean: a systematic literature review , 2012 .

[29]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  Supplier–supplier relationships in the buyer–supplier triad: Building theories from eight case studies , 2005 .

[30]  Andrew Lee‐Mortimer.  A lean route to manufacturing survival , 2006 .

[31]  J. Antony,et al.  Standards for Lean Six Sigma certification , 2011 .

[32]  Leonardo Rivera,et al.  Measuring the impact of Lean tools on the cost-time investment of a product using cost-time profiles , 2007 .

[33]  Hung-da Wan,et al.  A leanness measure of manufacturing systems for quantifying impacts of lean initiatives , 2008 .

[34]  Suresh Garg,et al.  Development of index for measuring leanness: study of an Indian auto component industry , 2010 .

[35]  Kenneth K. Boyer.  Longitudinal linkages between intended and realized operations strategies , 1998 .

[36]  F. Frank Chen,et al.  Decision support for lean practitioners: A web-based adaptive assessment approach , 2009, Comput. Ind..

[37]  José Moyano-Fuentes,et al.  International Journal of Operations & Production Management Emerald Article: Learning on lean: a review of thinking and research , 2012 .

[38]  Jeffrey K. Liker,et al.  The Toyota Production System and art: making highly customized and creative products the Toyota way , 2007 .

[39]  S. Vinodh,et al.  Application of fuzzy QFD for enabling leanness in a manufacturing organisation , 2011 .

[40]  William Feld,et al.  Lean Manufacturing: Tools, Techniques, and How to Use Them , 2000 .

[41]  A. de Korvin,et al.  Measuring the leanness of manufacturing systems-A case study of Ford Motor Company and General Motors , 2008 .

[42]  Marilena Dumitrache,et al.  The Impact of Lean Six Sigma on the Overall Results of Companies , 2011 .

[43]  Rosangela Maria Vanalle,et al.  Environmental Requirements in the Automotive Supply Chain – An Evaluation of a First Tier Company in the Brazilian Auto Industry , 2011 .

[44]  S. Vinodh,et al.  Leanness assessment using multi-grade fuzzy approach , 2011 .

[45]  G. Anand,et al.  Selection of lean manufacturing systems using the analytic network process – a case study , 2009 .

[46]  Jens J. Dahlgaard,et al.  Customer value as a key performance indicator (KPI) and a key improvement indicator (KII) , 2007 .

[47]  Jiju Antony,et al.  Six Sigma vs Lean: Some perspectives from leading academics and practitioners , 2011 .

[48]  James P. Womack,et al.  Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation , 1996 .

[49]  Diego Fernando Manotas Duque,et al.  LEAN MANUFACTURING MEASUREMENT: THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LEAN ACTIVITIES AND LEAN METRICS , 2007 .

[50]  Daniel T. Jones,et al.  The machine that changed the world : based on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology 5-million dollar 5-year study on the future of the automobile , 1990 .