Nonculprit Lesion Plaque Morphology in Patients With ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. Background: Complete revascularization with routine percutaneous coronary intervention of nonculprit lesions after primary percutaneous coronary intervention improves outcomes in ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction. Whether this benefit is associated with nonculprit lesion vulnerability is unknown. Methods: In a prospective substudy of the COMPLETEs trial (Complete vs Culprit-Only Revascularization to Treat Multi-Vessel Disease After Early PCI for STEMI), we performed optical coherence tomography of at least 2 coronary arteries before nonculprit lesion percutaneous coronary intervention in 93 patients with ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease; and the ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction culprit vessel if there was unstented segment amenable to imaging. Nonculprit lesions were categorized as obstructive (≥70% stenosis by visual angiographic assessment) or nonobstructive, and as thin-cap fibroatheroma (TCFA) or non-TCFA by optical coherence tomography criteria. TCFA was defined as a lesion with mean fibrous cap thickness <65 μm overlying a lipid arc >90°. Results: On a patient level, at least one obstructive TCFA was observed in 44/93 (47%) of patients. On a lesion level, there were 58 TCFAs among 150 obstructive nonculprit lesions compared with 74 TCFAs among 275 nonculprit lesions (adjusted TCFA prevalence: 35.4% versus 23.2%, P=0.022). Compared with obstructive non-TCFAs, obstructive TCFAs had similar lesion length (23.1 versus 20.8 mm, P=0.16) but higher lipid quadrants (55.2 versus 19.2, P<0.001), greater mean lipid arc (203.8° versus 84.5°, P<0.001), and more macrophages (97.1% versus 54.4%, P<0.001) and cholesterol crystals (85.8% versus 44.3%, P<0.001). For nonobstructive lesions, TCFA lesions had similar lesion length (16.7 versus 14.6 mm, P=0.11), but more lipid quadrants (36.4 versus 13.5, P<0.001), and greater mean lipid arc (191.8° versus 84.2°, P<0.001) compared with non-TCFA. Conclusions: Among patients who underwent optical coherence tomography imaging in the COMPLETE trial, nearly 50% had at least one obstructive nonculprit lesion containing complex vulnerable plaque. Obstructive lesions more commonly harbored vulnerable plaque morphology than nonobstructive lesions. This may help explain the benefit of routine percutaneous coronary intervention of obstructive nonculprit lesions in patients with ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01740479s.

[1]  A. M. Leone,et al.  Fractional Flow Reserve or Optical Coherence Tomography to Guide Management of Angiographically Intermediate Coronary Stenosis: A Single-Center Trial. , 2020, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[2]  Habib Samady,et al.  Identification of patients and plaques vulnerable to future coronary events with near-infrared spectroscopy intravascular ultrasound imaging: a prospective, cohort study , 2019, The Lancet.

[3]  D. Wood,et al.  Design and rationale of the COMPLETE trial: A randomized, comparative effectiveness study of complete versus culprit-only percutaneous coronary intervention to treat multivessel coronary artery disease in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. , 2019, American heart journal.

[4]  Á. Avezum,et al.  Complete Revascularization with Multivessel PCI for Myocardial Infarction. , 2019, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  P. Serruys,et al.  Changes in Coronary Plaque Composition in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated With High-Intensity Statin Therapy (IBIS-4): A Serial Optical Coherence Tomography Study. , 2019, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[6]  R. Waksman,et al.  Effect of Statin Therapy on Fibrous Cap Thickness in Coronary Plaque on Optical Coherence Tomography - Review and Meta-Analysis. , 2019, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.

[7]  L. Räber,et al.  Effect of statins and non-statin LDL-lowering medications on cardiovascular outcomes in secondary prevention: a meta-analysis of randomized trials , 2018, European heart journal.

[8]  J. Fujimoto,et al.  Clinical Significance of Lipid-Rich Plaque Detected by Optical Coherence Tomography: A 4-Year Follow-Up Study. , 2017, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  F. Neumann,et al.  Fractional Flow Reserve‐Guided Multivessel Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  Bo Yu,et al.  Association between cholesterol crystals and culprit lesion vulnerability in patients with acute coronary syndrome: An optical coherence tomography study. , 2016, Atherosclerosis.

[11]  L. Køber,et al.  Complete revascularisation versus treatment of the culprit lesion only in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease (DANAMI-3—PRIMULTI): an open-label, randomised controlled trial , 2015, The Lancet.

[12]  Habib Samady,et al.  Prevalence and characteristics of TCFA and degree of coronary artery stenosis: an OCT, IVUS, and angiographic study. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  Evelyn Regar,et al.  In vivo detection of high-risk coronary plaques by radiofrequency intravascular ultrasound and cardiovascular outcome: results of the ATHEROREMO-IVUS study. , 2014, European heart journal.

[14]  F. Prati,et al.  Optical coherence tomography criteria for defining functional severity of intermediate lesions: a comparative study with FFR , 2013, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[15]  R. Yeh,et al.  Nonculprit Plaques in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Have More Vulnerable Features Compared With Those With Non–Acute Coronary Syndromes: A 3-Vessel Optical Coherence Tomography Study , 2012, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[16]  C. Macaya,et al.  Morphometric assessment of coronary stenosis relevance with optical coherence tomography: a comparison with fractional flow reserve and intravascular ultrasound. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  Akiko Maehara,et al.  Consensus standards for acquisition, measurement, and reporting of intravascular optical coherence tomography studies: a report from the International Working Group for Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography Standardization and Validation. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[18]  Akiko Maehara,et al.  A prospective natural-history study of coronary atherosclerosis. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  Hiroto Tsujioka,et al.  Multiple coronary lesion instability in patients with acute myocardial infarction as determined by optical coherence tomography. , 2010, The American journal of cardiology.

[20]  W. O’Neill,et al.  Multiple complex coronary plaques in patients with acute myocardial infarction. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  R. Virmani,et al.  Lessons from sudden coronary death: a comprehensive morphological classification scheme for atherosclerotic lesions. , 2000, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[22]  Yoshihiko Saito,et al.  Thin-cap fibroatheroma and microchannel findings in optical coherence tomography correlate with subsequent progression of coronary atheromatous plaques. , 2012, European heart journal.

[23]  M. Takano,et al.  CLINICAL RESEARCH Coronary Artery Disease Angioscopic Follow-Up Study of Coronary Ruptured Plaques in Nonculprit Lesions , 2005 .