Adult age differences in the Color Stroop Test: a comparison between an Item-by-item and a Blocked version.
暂无分享,去创建一个
M Tettamanti | M. Tettamanti | E. Borella | C. Ludwig | A. Ribaupierre | A. De Ribaupierre | C Ludwig | E Borella | A de Ribaupierre | Erika Borella | Catherine Ludwig | Manuel Tettamanti
[1] Andrew R. A. Conway,et al. Variation in Working Memory Capacity as Variation in Executive Attention and Control , 2012 .
[2] P. Giannakopoulos,et al. The contribution of aging to the understanding of the dimensionality of executive functions. , 2009, Archives of gerontology and geriatrics (Print).
[3] E. Borella,et al. Do age differences between young and older adults in inhibitory tasks depend on the degree of activation of information? , 2009 .
[4] C. Ludwig,et al. L’Empan de lecture comme épreuve mesurant la capacité de mémoire de travail : normes basées sur une population francophone de 775 adultes jeunes et âgés , 2008 .
[5] Andrew R. A. Conway,et al. Variation in working memory , 2008 .
[6] A. Aron. The Neural Basis of Inhibition in Cognitive Control , 2007, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.
[7] C. Lustig,et al. Inhibitory Mechanisms and the Control of Attention , 2007 .
[8] Jonathan D. Cohen,et al. On the Control of Control: The Role of Dopamine in Regulating Prefrontal Function and Working Memory , 2007 .
[9] Deanna M. Barch,et al. Accounting for Cognitive Aging: Context Processing, Inhibition or Processing Speed? , 2006, Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition.
[10] E. Reingold,et al. Modulation of distraction in ageing. , 2006, British journal of psychology.
[11] Elizabeth L Irving,et al. Horizontal saccade dynamics across the human life span. , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[12] Roger A Dixon,et al. Structure of four executive functioning tests in healthy older adults. , 2006, Neuropsychology.
[13] W. Perlstein,et al. Cognitive control in closed head injury: context maintenance dysfunction or prepotent response inhibition deficit? , 2005, Neuropsychology.
[14] A. Vivas,et al. Differential age effects on attention-based inhibition: inhibitory tagging and inhibition of return. , 2005, Psychology and aging.
[15] Susan R. Homack,et al. A meta-analysis of the sensitivity and specificity of the Stroop Color and Word Test with children. , 2004, Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists.
[16] F. Craik,et al. Executive function across the life span. , 2004, Acta psychologica.
[17] Scott A Langenecker,et al. fMRI of healthy older adults during Stroop interference , 2004, NeuroImage.
[18] D. Algom,et al. Driven by information: a tectonic theory of Stroop effects. , 2003, Psychological review.
[19] Paul Verhaeghen,et al. Subitizing speed, subitizing range, counting speed, the Stroop effect, and aging: capacity differences and speed equivalence. , 2003, Psychology and aging.
[20] R. Engle,et al. Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: the contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[21] Alan Kingstone,et al. Why are antisaccades slower than prosaccades? A novel finding using a new paradigm , 2003, Neuroreport.
[22] A. Ribaupierre,et al. Inhibition et variabilité individuelle: généralité ou spécificité des processus inhibiteurs , 2003 .
[23] Michael D. Dodd,et al. In Opposition to Inhibition , 2003 .
[24] P. Rabbitt,et al. Individual inconsistency across measures of inhibition: an investigation of the construct validity of inhibition in older adults , 2002, Neuropsychologia.
[25] N. Cohen,et al. Attentional Control in the Aging Brain: Insights from an fMRI Study of the Stroop Task , 2002, Brain and Cognition.
[26] Terry Shikano,et al. Perceptual processing and search efficiency of young and older adults in a simple-feature search task: a staircase approach. , 2002, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.
[27] M. Hupet,et al. Cognitive Aging and Inhibitory Efficiency in the Daneman and Carpenter's Working Memory Task , 2002, Experimental aging research.
[28] D. Stuss,et al. Stroop performance in focal lesion patients: dissociation of processes and frontal lobe lesion location , 2001, Neuropsychologia.
[29] L. Robertson,et al. Interpreting Stroop interference: an analysis of differences between task versions. , 2001, Neuropsychology.
[30] L Hasher,et al. Working memory span and the role of proactive interference. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[31] P. Rabbitt,et al. Frontal tests and models for cognitive ageing , 2001 .
[32] Yves Bestgen,et al. Effet du vieillissement sur l'interférence et l'amorçage négatif dans la tâche de Stroop , 2001 .
[33] J. Driver,et al. Control of Cognitive Processes: Attention and Performance XVIII , 2000 .
[34] Raymond Bruyer, Jean-Christophe Scailquin. The Fate of Global Precedence With Age , 2000, Experimental aging research.
[35] Colin M. Macleod,et al. Interdimensional interference in the Stroop effect: uncovering the cognitive and neural anatomy of attention , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[36] A. Hartley,et al. Further evidence that negative priming in the Stroop color-word task is equivalent in older and younger adults. , 2000, Psychology and aging.
[37] C Alain,et al. Age-related decline in inhibitory control contributes to the increased Stroop effect observed in older adults. , 2000, Psychophysiology.
[38] J. Nigg. On inhibition/disinhibition in developmental psychopathology: views from cognitive and personality psychology and a working inhibition taxonomy. , 2000, Psychological bulletin.
[39] R. Bruyer,et al. Assessment of visuospatial short-term memory and effect of aging , 1999 .
[40] J. Cohen,et al. The "benefits" of distractibility: mechanisms underlying increased Stroop effects in schizophrenia. , 1999, Schizophrenia bulletin.
[41] Patrick Rabbitt,et al. Test\re-test reliability of the CANTAB and ISPOCD neuropsychological batteries: theoretical and practical issues , 1998, Neuropsychologia.
[42] W. Perlstein,et al. The Stroop task and attention deficits in schizophrenia: a critical evaluation of card and single-trial Stroop methodologies. , 1998, Neuropsychology.
[43] G. Baylis,et al. Effects of increased response dominance and contextual disintegration on the Stroop interference effect in older adults. , 1998, Psychology and aging.
[44] L Hasher,et al. Synchrony effects in inhibitory control over thought and action. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[45] P. Verhaeghen,et al. Aging and the Stroop effect: a meta-analysis. , 1998, Psychology and aging.
[46] M. Kindt,et al. Cognitive bias in spider fear and control children: assessment of emotional interference by a card format and a single-trial format of the stroop task. , 1997, Journal of experimental child psychology.
[47] Cynthia P. May,et al. Inhibitory control over no-longer-relevant information: Adult age differences , 1997, Memory & cognition.
[48] C. Weir,et al. Are backward words special for older adults? , 1997, Psychology and aging.
[49] A. Hartley,et al. Age-related equivalence of identity suppression in the Stroop color-word task. , 1997, Psychology and aging.
[50] M. Kindt,et al. Stroop versus Stroop: Comparison of a card format and a single-trial format of the standard color-word Stroop task and the emotional Stroop task , 1996 .
[51] E. A. Bosman,et al. Age differences in stroop-like interference as a function of semantic relatedness , 1996 .
[52] T. Salthouse. The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. , 1996, Psychological review.
[53] D. Balota,et al. Stroop performance in healthy younger and older adults and in individuals with dementia of the Alzheimer's type. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[54] T. Salthouse,et al. Aging, inhibition, working memory, and speed. , 1995, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.
[55] K. K. Harnishfeger,et al. The development of cognitive inhibition: Theories, definitions, and research evidence , 1995 .
[56] F. N. Dempster,et al. Interference and inhibition in cognition: An historical perspective , 1995 .
[57] Diane L. Filion,et al. Inhibitory processes in cognition and aging , 1995 .
[58] Lynn Hasher,et al. Optimal Time of Day and the Magnitude of Age Differences in Memory , 1993 .
[59] Matthew Flatt,et al. PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers , 1993 .
[60] A. Hartley,et al. Evidence for the selective preservation of spatial selective attention in old age. , 1993, Psychology and aging.
[61] F. N. Dempster,et al. The rise and fall of the inhibitory mechanism: Toward a unified theory of cognitive development and aging , 1992 .
[62] J. Stroop. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. , 1992 .
[63] L Hasher,et al. Aging and suppression: memory for previously relevant information. , 1991, Psychology and aging.
[64] Colin M. Macleod. Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.
[65] James L. McClelland,et al. On the control of automatic processes: a parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. , 1990, Psychological review.
[66] J. Cerella. Aging and Information-Processing Rate , 1990 .
[67] J. Birren,et al. Handbook of the psychology of aging, 3rd ed. , 1985 .
[68] P. Panek,et al. Locus of the age-Stroop interference relationship. , 1984 .
[69] D. C. Bradford,et al. Age-related decrements in Stroop Color Test performance. , 1984, Journal of clinical psychology.
[70] Fergus I. M. Craik,et al. Aging and Cognitive Deficits , 1982 .
[71] Sandra E. Trehub,et al. Aging and cognitive processes , 1982 .
[72] Denise C. Park,et al. Handbook of the Psychology of Aging , 1979 .
[73] F. Carp. Handbook of the psychology of aging. , 1977 .
[74] F N Dyer,et al. The Stroop phenomenon and its use in the stlldy of perceptual, cognitive, and response processes , 1973, Memory & cognition.
[75] F. Dyer,et al. Stroop interference with successive presentations of separate incongruent words and colors. , 1973, Journal of experimental psychology.
[76] T M Galloway,et al. Who benefits? , 1970, Lancet.
[77] E. C. Dalrymple-Alford,et al. Examination of Some Aspects of the Stroop Color-Word Test , 1966, Perceptual and motor skills.
[78] J. Tecce,et al. Effects of Heightened Drive (Shock) on Performance in a Tachistoscopic Color-Word Interference Task , 1965, Psychological reports.
[79] H. Werner,et al. Interference effects of Stroop color-word test in childhood, adulthood, and aging. , 1962, The Journal of genetic psychology.