Transition from absolute to quantitative short‐day control in Nicotiana tabacum cv. Maryland Mammoth

The response in vitro of thin cell layers, excised from different stem regions of Nicotiana tabacum cv. Maryland Mammoth plants at various developmental stages, was studied under different photoperiodic treatments. The aim was to determine at which stage of plant development, and in which region of the stem, the absolute short-day requirement, indispensable for the induction of the flowering process in this genotype, becomes quantitative and whether it remains short-day. The explants were cultured on a medium suitable for flower neoformation, and were exposed for 30 days to the following treatments: continuous darkness, 8 h light/16 h dark per day, 16 h light/8 h dark per day, and continuous light. The first flowers on explants were observed from plants that were still in the vegetative state, but whose apex showed an accelerated production of axillary vegetative buds, as observed histologically. These explants were excised from the first 10 internodes below the first node with a leaf ≥ 5 cm in length (apical site), and produced flowers only under short-day treatment. When the apical dome initiated the organization of the terminal flower, the apical site explants developed flowers under both short-day and long-day treatments. At the same stage, explants from the 15th to the 20th internode below the first leaf ≥ 5 cm in length also formed flowers, but only under short-day. When the plant showed a complete inflorescence, flowers were also present on explants from the most basal stem internodes and from the inflorescence branches. At this stage, flower neoformation occurred under all treatments; however, under short-day the number of explants showing flowers not associated with vegetative buds on the same sample greatly exceeded that observed under other treatments, as did the mean number of flowers per explant (except the basal regions). In conclusion, in the post-inductive phases of the flowering process, the photoperiodic requirement of this genotype is always short-day. The superficial tissues of the stem require either absolute or quantitative short-day treatment, depending on their position on the stem and the stage of evolution of the flowering process in the terminal apex.

[1]  M. Rajeevan,et al.  Comparison of de-novo flower-bud formation in a photoperiodic and a day-neutral tobacco , 1987, Planta.

[2]  C. McDaniel Influence of leaves and roots on meristem development inNicotiana tabacum L. cv. Wisconsin 38 , 1980, Planta.

[3]  A. Chlyah,et al.  Regulation of organogenesis in small explants of superficial tissue of Nicotiana tabacum L. , 1974, Planta.

[4]  S. Smith,et al.  The maryland mammoth allele and rooting both perturb the fate of florally determined apices in Nicotiana tabacum. , 1992, Developmental biology.

[5]  M. Altamura,et al.  The role of hormones on morphogenesis of thin layer explants from normal and transgenic tobacco plants , 1992 .

[6]  G. Pasqua,et al.  Flower formation in vitro in a quantitative short‐day tobacco: interrelation between photoperiod and infructescence development , 1991 .

[7]  C. McDaniel,et al.  Cryptic floral determination: stem explants from vegetative tobacco plants have the capacity to regenerate floral shoots. , 1989, Developmental biology.

[8]  G. Pasqua,et al.  The effect of photoperiod on flower formation in vitro in a quantitative short-day cultivar of Nicotiana tabacum , 1989 .

[9]  S. Singer,et al.  Floral determination in internode tissues of day-neutral tobacco first occurs many nodes below the apex. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  S. Singer,et al.  8 – FLORAL DETERMINATION: A CRITICAL PROCESS IN MERISTEM ONTOGENY , 1987 .

[11]  G. Pasqua,et al.  Nuclear DNA changes during plant development and the morphogenetic response in vitro of Nicotiana tabacum tissues , 1987 .

[12]  S. Singer,et al.  Floral determination in the terminal and axillary buds of Nicotiana tabacum L , 1986 .

[13]  A. Cousson,et al.  Influence des facteurs génétique et physiologique chez le Nicotiana sur la néoformation in vitro de fleurs à partir d'assises cellulaires épidermiques et sous-épidermiques , 1981 .

[14]  G. S. Avery, STRUCTURE AND GERMINATION OF TOBACCO SEED AND THE DEVELOPMENTAL ANATOMY OF THE SEEDLING PLANT , 1933 .

[15]  H. Allard Gigantism in Nicotiana tabacum and Its Alternative Inheritance , 1919, The American Naturalist.