Localizing pre-attentive auditory memory-based comparison: Magnetic mismatch negativity to pitch change

Changes in the pitch of repetitive sounds elicit the mismatch negativity (MMN) of the event-related brain potential (ERP). There exist two alternative accounts for this index of automatic change detection: (1) A sensorial, non-comparator account according to which ERPs in oddball sequences are affected by differential refractory states of frequency-specific afferent cortical neurons. (2) A cognitive, comparator account stating that MMN reflects the outcome of a memory comparison between a neuronal model of the frequently presented standard sound with the sensory memory representation of the changed sound. Using a condition controlling for refractoriness effects, the two contributions to MMN can be disentangled. The present study used whole-head MEG to further elucidate the sensorial and cognitive contributions to frequency MMN. Results replicated ERP findings that MMN to pitch change is a compound of the activity of a sensorial, non-comparator mechanism and a cognitive, comparator mechanism which could be separated in time. The sensorial part of frequency MMN consisting of spatially dipolar patterns was maximal in the late N1 range (105-125 ms), while the cognitive part peaked in the late MMN-range (170-200 ms). Spatial principal component analyses revealed that the early part of the traditionally measured MMN (deviant minus standard) is mainly due to the sensorial mechanism while the later mainly due to the cognitive mechanism. Inverse modeling revealed sources for both MMN contributions in the gyrus temporales transversus, bilaterally. These MEG results suggest temporally distinct but spatially overlapping activities of non-comparator-based and comparator-based mechanisms of automatic frequency change detection in auditory cortex.

[1]  K. Alho.  Cerebral Generators of Mismatch Negativity (MMN) and Its Magnetic Counterpart (MMNm) Elicited by Sound Changes , 1995, Ear and hearing.

[2]  E. Schröger,et al.  Is there pre-attentive memory-based comparison of pitch? , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[3]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Tonotopic organization of the human auditory cortex. , 1982, Science.

[4]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[5]  K. Lehnertz,et al.  Tonotopic organization of the human auditory cortex revealed by transient auditory evoked magnetic fields. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[6]  E. Schröger,et al.  Mismatch response of the human brain to changes in sound location , 1996, Neuroreport.

[7]  B Opitz,et al.  Sensory and cognitive mechanisms for preattentive change detection in auditory cortex , 2005, The European journal of neuroscience.

[8]  M. Tervaniemi,et al.  The mismatch negativity in cognitive and clinical neuroscience: Theoretical and methodological considerations , 2007, Biological Psychology.

[9]  Th R Knösche,et al.  Transformation of Whole-Head MEG Recordings Between Different Sensor Positions / Transformation von Ganzkopf-MEG-Messungen zwischen verschiedenen Sensorpositionen , 2002, Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering.

[10]  E. Schröger,et al.  Preattentive Memory-Based Comparison of Sound Intensity , 2003, Audiology and Neurotology.

[11]  R J Ilmoniemi,et al.  Tonotopic auditory cortex and the magnetoencephalographic (MEG) equivalent of the mismatch negativity. , 1993, Psychophysiology.

[12]  Risto Näätänen,et al.  Higher-order processes in auditory-change detection , 1997, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  E. Schröger,et al.  Measuring duration mismatch negativity , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[14]  R. Näätänen.  Attention and brain function , 1992 .

[15]  E. N. Sokolov,et al.  Frequency and location specificity of the human vertex N1 wave. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[16]  W. Ritter,et al.  Orienting and habituation to auditory stimuli: a study of short term changes in average evoked responses. , 1968, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[17]  A. Friederici,et al.  Discrimination of word stress in early infant perception: electrophysiological evidence. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[18]  T. Picton,et al.  The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. , 1987, Psychophysiology.

[19]  E. Pekkonen,et al.  Auditory Sensory Memory and the Cholinergic System: Implications for Alzheimer's Disease , 2001, NeuroImage.

[20]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted. , 1978, Acta psychologica.

[21]  I. Winkler,et al.  Mismatch negativity to pitch change: varied stimulus proportions in controlling effects of neural refractoriness on human auditory event-related brain potentials , 2003, Neuroscience Letters.

[22]  H. Schröger.  Response from Schröger , 1997, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[23]  K. Reinikainen,et al.  Do event-related potentials reveal the mechanism of the auditory sensory memory in the human brain? , 1989, Neuroscience Letters.

[24]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Functional Specialization of the Human Auditory Cortex in Processing Phonetic and Musical Sounds: A Magnetoencephalographic (MEG) Study , 1999, NeuroImage.

[25]  K. Alho,et al.  Separate Time Behaviors of the Temporal and Frontal Mismatch Negativity Sources , 2000, NeuroImage.

[26]  A. Dale,et al.  Human posterior auditory cortex gates novel sounds to consciousness. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  D. Siddle,et al.  Orienting, habituation, and resource allocation: an associative analysis. , 1991, Psychophysiology.

[28]  I. Winkler,et al.  ‘Primitive intelligence’ in the auditory cortex , 2001, Trends in Neurosciences.

[29]  István Winkler,et al.  Processing abstract auditory features in the human auditory cortex , 2003, NeuroImage.

[30]  Risto Näätänen,et al.  Memory‐related processing of complex sound patterns in human auditory cortex: a MEG study , 1993, Neuroreport.

[31]  Bernd Lütkenhöner,et al.  Single-Dipole Analyses of the N100m Are Not Suitable for Characterizing the Cortical Representation of Pitch , 2003, Audiology and Neurotology.

[32]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Combined mapping of human auditory EEG and MEG responses. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[33]  K. Reinikainen,et al.  Right hemisphere dominance of different mismatch negativities. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[34]  D Morlet,et al.  Mismatch negativity and late auditory evoked potentials in comatose patients , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[35]  I. Winkler,et al.  Memory-based or afferent processes in mismatch negativity (MMN): a review of the evidence. , 2005, Psychophysiology.

[36]  R. Butler,et al.  Stimulus repetition rate factors which influence the auditory evoked potential in man. , 1969, Psychophysiology.

[37]  T. Picton,et al.  Human auditory sustained potentials. II. Stimulus relationships. , 1978, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[38]  I. Winkler,et al.  Event-related brain potentials reflect traces of echoic memory in humans , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[39]  M. Karjalainen,et al.  Short-term memory functions of the human fetus recorded with magnetoencephalography , 2005, Neuroreport.