Current technology on minimally invasive surgery and Interventional Techniques

Minimally invasive techniques (MIT) are used in interventions making use of long instruments inserted via natural openings or small incisions in the skin. There is a large role for technology in these interventions focusing on treating the patient with minimal damage to healthy tissue. Because of the interposition of these instruments, the degrees of movements are limited, visual feedback is indirect via use of endoscopic camera or imaging techniques, and haptic feedback is limited to force feedback to the human hand. Extensive training is needed to master the difficult minimally invasive methods. Traditionally, surgical training is performed on patients in the OR under supervision of an experienced surgeon/interventionist. Several training methods became available to train minimally invasive skills outside the operating room, e.g. box-trainers, VR-trainers, with and without a haptic feedback. In this paper, technology recently developed or under development for minimally invasive surgery, single port surgery, flexible endoscopy, NOTES (Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery), needle and other type of interventions will be described, including recent developments in robotic systems. In addition, recent advancements in training systems development will be described and the advantages and disadvantages of the different training methods will be compared. Furthermore, the role of force feedback will be discussed.

[1]  Jenny Dankelman,et al.  Force measurement platform for training and assessment of laparoscopic skills , 2010, Surgical Endoscopy.

[2]  Georges-Pascal Haber,et al.  SPIDER surgical system for urologic procedures with laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: from initial laboratory experience to first clinical application. , 2012, European urology.

[3]  S. Bardaro,et al.  Development of advanced endoscopes for Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) , 2006, Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy.

[4]  Bin Zheng,et al.  Bimanual coordination in natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: comparing the conventional dual-channel endoscope, the R-Scope, and a novel direct-drive system. , 2009, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[5]  Paul Swain,et al.  New Measurement Methods and a Randomized Comparison of Force Transmission Using Flexible Endoscopes and Instruments Before and After the Application of ShapeLock™ Technology , 2005 .

[6]  J. Dankelman,et al.  Friction dynamics of trocars , 2006, Surgical Endoscopy.

[7]  A. Darzi,et al.  Navigation systems and platforms in natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). , 2009, International journal of surgery.

[8]  J. Dankelman,et al.  Peroperative analysis of the surgical procedure , 2001, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[9]  P. Breedveld,et al.  A new, easily miniaturized steerable endoscope , 2005, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[10]  G. Spaun,et al.  Quo vadis NOTES? , 2008, European Surgery.

[11]  H. Stassen,et al.  Manipulation in laparoscopic surgery: overview of impeding effects and supporting aids. , 1999, Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A.

[12]  Henryk Sienkiewicz,et al.  Quo Vadis? , 1967, American Association of Industrial Nurses journal.

[13]  Peter K. Allen,et al.  System design of an Insertable Robotic Effector Platform for Single Port Access (SPA) Surgery , 2009, 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[14]  John J. van den Dobbelsteen,et al.  Force feedback and basic laparoscopic skills , 2008, Surgical Endoscopy.

[15]  Jenny Dankelman,et al.  New technologies supporting surgical interventions and training of surgical skills. , 2007, IEEE engineering in medicine and biology magazine : the quarterly magazine of the Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society.

[16]  Jenny Dankelman,et al.  TrEndo, a device for tracking minimally invasive surgical instruments in training setups , 2006 .

[17]  Jacques Marescaux,et al.  The ANUBIS™ project , 2010, Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy.

[18]  Jenny Dankelman,et al.  Slip and damage properties of jaws of laparoscopic graspers , 2004, Surgical Endoscopy.

[19]  Alois Knoll,et al.  The mechatronic support system “HVSPS” and the way to NOTES , 2008, Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy.

[20]  J. Dankelman,et al.  Haptics in minimally invasive surgery – a review , 2008, Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy.

[21]  Henk G. Stassen,et al.  Engineering for Patient Safety: Issues in Minimally Invasive Procedures , 2009 .

[22]  H. Stassen,et al.  Observation in laparoscopic surgery: overview of impeding effects and supporting aids. , 1999, Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A.

[23]  I. B. Borel Rinkes,et al.  Feasibility of Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery: An Evaluation of 35 Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Cholecystectomies , 2002, Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques.

[24]  J. L. Herder,et al.  Forces and displacements in colon surgery , 2002, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[25]  Paul Breedveld Steerable Laparoscopic Cable-Ring Forceps , 2010 .